Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 90 of 90

Thread: Arnett signs 3 year deal

  1. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,914
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by Activated Alpha View Post
    **** C34, give it a rest. We know State is poor. Unless some alumni hits the life lottery and invents the cure for cancer, we will not consistently have 25mm+ rosters every year. It?s just not financially feasible to rely on the limited millionaire boosters we have to continue doing that
    We're actually going to be close to 25 million.
    Which is almost double what Indiana spent this year per 247

  2. #82
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,370
    vCash
    62060
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    You said you would be happy if we beat Arkansas. You lied.
    Cry me a river.

  3. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Fairhope, AL
    Posts
    8,178
    vCash
    23720
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    We're actually going to be close to 25 million.
    Which is almost double what Indiana spent this year per 247
    Is that total for all sports or just for football? Is that just NIL or includes donor contributions also? For 23-24 we were at $23MM total. So if we spent $15MM on football then $8MM went to other sports. That ranked us 34th in total spending. We sure did not realize that kind of performance value last year.

  4. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,914
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by EdwardDrayton View Post
    Is that total for all sports or just for football? Is that just NIL or includes donor contributions also? For 23-24 we were at $23MM total. So if we spent $15MM on football then $8MM went to other sports. That ranked us 34th in total spending. We sure did not realize that kind of performance value last year.
    We will spend over 20 million on just football.
    15-16 million of that will be rev share, meaning State Excellence Fund. The rest will be NIL, meaning from the collective.

  5. #85
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    212
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    If we're going to make a terrible hire at DC we might as well double down and give him a terrible contract to go with it.
    Makes sense......for us.

  6. #86
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,853
    vCash
    3012900
    Quote Originally Posted by EdwardDrayton View Post
    Total Contributions Rank in SEC -- National ranking in (parenthesis)

    1. Texas - $77,974,073 (#1)

    2. LSU - $75,929,827 (#2)

    3. Georgia - $74,315,945 (#3)

    4. Florida - $61,364,272 ((#7)

    5. Texas A&M - $54,204,110 ((#9)

    6. Alabama - $53,113,300 (#11)

    7. Oklahoma - $43,180,134 (#13)

    8. Auburn - $36,372,783 (#18)

    9. Tennessee - $35,483,274 (#19)

    10. Ole Miss - $34,409,478 (#20)

    11. South Carolina - $33,833,869 (#21)

    12. Missouri - $29,555,704 (#24)

    13. Kentucky - $27,938,279 (#29)

    14. Mississippi State - $22,612,228 (#34)

    15. Arkansas - $22,165,941 (#35)

    16. Vanderbilt - N/A (Private School)
    Kinda proving Coach's point on this. We beat literally everyone we outspent this season. 4 non con's and Arkansas, and lost to everyone that outspent us. (Assuming Arizona State didn't outspend us, which they may have)

    Arguing that "we may be at the bottom of the SEC but not the country!", when 9 of our games every year going forward are SEC GAMES, is not a good argument. We are poor overall bc we play in the SEC and are dead last, or second to last.

    So Lebby actually did a jam up job to have us in nail biters with #1, #4, and #9.

    Especially with a bottom tier budget and a nincompoop as DC. Matter of fact, the Hutzler hire may be his only negative at this point considering the budget and cupboard he took over.

  7. #87
    Senior Member Turfdawg67's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    5,405
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by DEDawg View Post
    I think it is a brain dead take to say any coach besides Lebby has us 7-5. I guess the assumption would be we win 2 out of 3 of Florida Texas and Tenn. We averaged 31 points in those 3 games. So Qs argument is that while Lebby had us competitive in those 3 games against much more talented rosters, everything that went wrong was on Lebby but everything that went right to have us competitive against much more talented rosters is disregarded. Doesnt make sense to me.
    Exactly. Totally ignores the fact that we were IN position to beat TX and UF was because of Lebby to begin with... and stand toe to toe with TN and beat ASU.

  8. #88
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,370
    vCash
    62060
    Quote Originally Posted by Turfdawg67 View Post
    Exactly. Totally ignores the fact that we were IN position to beat TX and UF was because of Lebby to begin with... and stand toe to toe with TN and beat ASU.
    Florida was a bad team this year! There's nothing impressive about a close loss to them. Not only did they fire their coach, 2 teams who beat them also fired their coaches.

    I can get the argument that playing Texas close is at least something in Lebby's favor, but I still go back to the fact that all he had to do is run out the clock, and he just couldn't do it.

  9. #89
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,100
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by CadaverDawg View Post
    Kinda proving Coach's point on this. We beat literally everyone we outspent this season. 4 non con's and Arkansas, and lost to everyone that outspent us. (Assuming Arizona State didn't outspend us, which they may have)

    Arguing that "we may be at the bottom of the SEC but not the country!", when 9 of our games every year going forward are SEC GAMES, is not a good argument. We are poor overall bc we play in the SEC and are dead last, or second to last.

    So Lebby actually did a jam up job to have us in nail biters with #1, #4, and #9.

    Especially with a bottom tier budget and a nincompoop as DC. Matter of fact, the Hutzler hire may be his only negative at this point considering the budget and cupboard he took over.
    Money wasn't the reason we lost to Texas, Florida, or TN. Our coach wet the bed.

  10. #90
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    5,767
    vCash
    13621
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    You guys have to understand- NIL has changed EVERYTHING. Old coaching norms and conference prestige are gone.

    Texas Tech is a Top 4 seed- why? They spent 35MM in NIL.
    The kid on the left, looking up to the Pirate is the TTU NIL King. He is something like 25M of the 35M they spend.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.