Ranked 6th In Bill Connelly's S&P Rankings

[BB30]

None of these reasons tell me why A&M would've folded last night if Sumlin was coaching.

What if Clemson had a bad night? What if Clemson is not really that good?

IDK, but some of you are just seeing what you want to see & are now acting like Kevin Sumlin was garbage at A&M.

Do you realize that A&M won 8.5 games per year under Sumlin & almost 8 games per year after Manzel. They played a Bama team that is far better than Clemson's team this year, last year to the wire.

Other than saying that Mond is better & a year older, I'm not seeing this drastic evidence, after last night, that A&M is all the sudden much better & has a new culture.

Sumlin was 16-20 vs the sec west. 12 of those 16 came against Arkansas or happened when he had manziel.

41 of his 51 wins weren’t good ones. 17 were against non power 5 teams. 6 came against Arkansas. 18 came against teams that finished no better than 8-5. 9 of those 18 were against teams that finished below 500.

If that doesn’t scream mediocre I don’t know what does.

I’ve also seen you be hard on some state teams for finishing with 7-8 wins.

Judging your version of good seems like you should be happy with a coach at state who wins 7-8 games and has one good season every 6 years.