Quote Originally Posted by dawgday166 View Post
A) South Carolina is getting Muschamp love since he comes off Saban tree. I saw the beatdown coming yesterday. We much better than USCe IMO.
B) Sumlin teams are soft as Charmin. Give up easily too.
C) Bama can have an off game every so often. Saban probably didn't want Jimbo at TAM, so he trying to help keep Sumlin there.
None of these reasons tell me why A&M would've folded last night if Sumlin was coaching.

What if Clemson had a bad night? What if Clemson is not really that good?

IDK, but some of you are just seeing what you want to see & are now acting like Kevin Sumlin was garbage at A&M.

Do you realize that A&M won 8.5 games per year under Sumlin & almost 8 games per year after Manzel. They played a Bama team that is far better than Clemson's team this year, last year to the wire.

Other than saying that Mond is better & a year older, I'm not seeing this drastic evidence, after last night, that A&M is all the sudden much better & has a new culture.