-
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
I don't understand why this concept is so alien to people. Regardless of what you thought at the beginning of the year, if you thought 4-8 would be great, 5-7, 6-6, 8-4, whatever, any threshold to be a "great" year has to be adjusted once you learn that the schedule wasn't nearly as hard as most people thought it would be.
I, like MANY people, thought that 6-6 would be decent, and 5-7 was a minimum to keep his job, but if I'd known the schedule was weaker than I thought, I would have said 7-5 was decent, 6-6 minimum, and 8-4 to be a good season.
Our current SOS now that the season is over is 13. Idk where this notion came from we played an easy schedule. Everyone knew Arkansas and UF were shaky going into the year. USM, Ole Miss, and A&M were all better than expected. The only team you can really argue is Texas and they still were a 9-3 team
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote