Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Playoff lines

  1. #1
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    77,525
    vCash
    20439

    Playoff lines

    Bama at Oklahoma (-1.5)
    Miami at aTm (-4)
    Tulane at OM (-17.5)
    James Madison at Oregon (-21)

    I know lines aren't actual outcomes, but just think how the rules robbed the consumers (us) and the providers. Plug Texas at Oregon and nD at OM, and that would be an absolute great weekend of football.

  2. #2
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    77,525
    vCash
    20439
    The format is dumb too bc Oregon and OM reap more benefits than the 4 byes. They get a home warm up game, so financial benefits and get their timing back after a delay.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Tater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    3,461
    vCash
    13000
    Just need to expand to 28 and give every conference an AQ. Every team should have access to controlling their own destiny. Win every game and you're national champion. Win your conference + win all playoff games. Simple as that. That's where we the consumer are truly robbed.

    A 28 team model with all 10 conference champions would have games like USC - Utah, Houston - ND, BYU - Virginia, Michigan - Texsa, Miami - GT, JMU - Bama, Vandy - Arizona among others letting conference champions in like OU - Duke, Aggy - Boise, Ohio State - Wazzu, Oregon - WMU, Ole Miss - Kennesaw State in week 1. Then week 2 if you assume complete chalk - Indiana - Utah, Aggy - OU, Ohio State - ND, Tulane - BYU, Texas Tech - Texas, Oregon - Miami, Ole Miss - Alabama, Georgia - Vandy. (Tulane earns the 4th seed in my model that gives the top 4 conference champions the byes.)

    Can't tell me that model wouldn't be thrilling football. Plus I didn't even have to tweak rankings to avoid any rematches in the first two rounds this year.
    "Once the game starts, it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, July 10th, 2010

    "No one ever said it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, June 12th, 2011

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    6,091
    vCash
    13828
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Bama at Oklahoma (-1.5)
    Miami at aTm (-4)
    Tulane at OM (-17.5)
    James Madison at Oregon (-21)

    I know lines aren't actual outcomes, but just think how the rules robbed the consumers (us) and the providers. Plug Texas at Oregon and nD at OM, and that would be an absolute great weekend of football.
    I don’t know the rules one bit, but don’t tell me James Madison and Tulane are better than N Dame and Vandy. The whole idea should be to get the best playing the best

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    3,736
    vCash
    13000
    Only P4 should be involved. If the lower tier schools want to have a football tourney then have at it.

  6. #6
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,298
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by Tater View Post
    Just need to expand to 28 and give every conference an AQ. Every team should have access to controlling their own destiny. Win every game and you're national champion. Win your conference + win all playoff games. Simple as that. That's where we the consumer are truly robbed.

    A 28 team model with all 10 conference champions would have games like USC - Utah, Houston - ND, BYU - Virginia, Michigan - Texsa, Miami - GT, JMU - Bama, Vandy - Arizona among others letting conference champions in like OU - Duke, Aggy - Boise, Ohio State - Wazzu, Oregon - WMU, Ole Miss - Kennesaw State in week 1. Then week 2 if you assume complete chalk - Indiana - Utah, Aggy - OU, Ohio State - ND, Tulane - BYU, Texas Tech - Texas, Oregon - Miami, Ole Miss - Alabama, Georgia - Vandy. (Tulane earns the 4th seed in my model that gives the top 4 conference champions the byes.)

    Can't tell me that model wouldn't be thrilling football. Plus I didn't even have to tweak rankings to avoid any rematches in the first two rounds this year.
    28 teams LOL holy crap

  7. #7
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    77,525
    vCash
    20439
    Quote Originally Posted by Pancho View Post
    Only P4 should be involved. If the lower tier schools want to have a football tourney then have at it.
    Let the highest ranked g5 team play the #12 team to get in. Have it after the army-navy game every year.

  8. #8
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    12,661
    vCash
    1550088
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    28 teams LOL holy crap
    That's where it's going. It will 100% be at least 24 teams. More likely 28.

  9. #9
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,172
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by Pancho View Post
    Only P4 should be involved. If the lower tier schools want to have a football tourney then have at it.
    Honestly, this is the way to do it. No one pretends the FBS and FCS are on the same level. Let's stop pretending G6 and P4 are on the same level.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    2,894
    vCash
    13000
    This is more a change that needs to be made in the future for conference tie breakers than a format change. Whenever there is a tiebreaker for a conference title game, it should be the highest ranked team in the playoff rankings. Now, I do agree that there should be a format change to expand to 16 and eliminate the BYE with the first round being on campus for the top 8 seeds. In 10 years when we have super conferences and we aren?t included, be careful what you wish for about cutting the G5 team. We need to keep the G5 champ in.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Tater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    3,461
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    28 teams LOL holy crap
    FCS has 24. March madness has 68. It's honestly ridiculous how few we do have compared to every other sport pro or college. The % just doesn't make sense.
    "Once the game starts, it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, July 10th, 2010

    "No one ever said it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, June 12th, 2011

  12. #12
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    12,661
    vCash
    1550088
    Quote Originally Posted by Tater View Post
    FCS has 24. March madness has 68. It's honestly ridiculous how few we do have compared to every other sport pro or college. The % just doesn't make sense.
    Baseball has 64.
    Leach always tried to tell everyone it should be 64 teams. Lol

  13. #13
    Senior Member LC Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    6,283
    vCash
    14938
    I'll watch Ole Miss just to see how they look without Kiffin but I doubt I tune in to Oregon-James Madison.
    In this current NIL era I don't think a G5 school is going to sneak in and beat someone but even if that team exists it should be evident from watching them play.
    OM beat Tulane 45-10 earlier this year and Tulane gets a rematch in a 12 team playoff because of some dumbass participation rule.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Bubb Rubb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    2,215
    vCash
    12610
    Quote Originally Posted by Tater View Post
    Just need to expand to 28 and give every conference an AQ. Every team should have access to controlling their own destiny. Win every game and you're national champion. Win your conference + win all playoff games. Simple as that. That's where we the consumer are truly robbed.

    A 28 team model with all 10 conference champions would have games like USC - Utah, Houston - ND, BYU - Virginia, Michigan - Texsa, Miami - GT, JMU - Bama, Vandy - Arizona among others letting conference champions in like OU - Duke, Aggy - Boise, Ohio State - Wazzu, Oregon - WMU, Ole Miss - Kennesaw State in week 1. Then week 2 if you assume complete chalk - Indiana - Utah, Aggy - OU, Ohio State - ND, Tulane - BYU, Texas Tech - Texas, Oregon - Miami, Ole Miss - Alabama, Georgia - Vandy. (Tulane earns the 4th seed in my model that gives the top 4 conference champions the byes.)

    Can't tell me that model wouldn't be thrilling football. Plus I didn't even have to tweak rankings to avoid any rematches in the first two rounds this year.
    It's also a pretty good way to ensure that the best football team rarely would win the national championship.

    Cap it at 16 and leave out the G5. That's the way to go.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    2,894
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by LC Dawg View Post
    I'll watch Ole Miss just to see how they look without Kiffin but I doubt I tune in to Oregon-James Madison.
    In this current NIL era I don't think a G5 school is going to sneak in and beat someone but even if that team exists it should be evident from watching them play.
    OM beat Tulane 45-10 earlier this year and Tulane gets a rematch in a 12 team playoff because of some dumbass participation rule.
    Indiana has a composite talent ranking of 72 and they are the number 1 seed. That is worse than Tulane and other G5 teams so it is possible it can happen if you get the right coach.

  16. #16
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,172
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by PGHBulldogBG View Post
    Indiana has a composite talent ranking of 72 and they are the number 1 seed. That is worse than Tulane and other G5 teams so it is possible it can happen if you get the right coach.
    Cig is a unicorn. He is just that damn good of a coach. His talent evaluation will be studied for years to come. Obviously having a 1st round pick at QB helps, but what he is doing is really damn impressive.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    2,894
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Cig is a unicorn. He is just that damn good of a coach. His talent evaluation will be studied for years to come. Obviously having a 1st round pick at QB helps, but what he is doing is really damn impressive.
    I love Cig because he has basically proven everyone wrong about how you have to have top talent to win. Marshall 1998 with Pennington and Moss was another team similar to this Indiana team that went undefeated and could have competed with the top teams but they weren?t given a chance. Sure it is rare, but the top G5 school needs its shot.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    14,023
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by DownwardDawg View Post
    That's where it's going. It will 100% be at least 24 teams. More likely 28.
    Which is stupid. But I'm not disagreeing that's where it's going. But a watered down pile of crap is what that is.

  19. #19
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,172
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by PGHBulldogBG View Post
    I love Cig because he has basically proven everyone wrong about how you have to have top talent to win. Marshall 1998 with Pennington and Moss was another team similar to this Indiana team that went undefeated and could have competed with the top teams but they weren?t given a chance. Sure it is rare, but the top G5 school needs its shot.
    Then take it to 24. 10 conference champions and 14 at larges. That gives the SEC and the Big 10 probably 4 guaranteed spots a piece, the ACC and Big 12 probably 2 spots a piece, Notre Dame(if they're in the top 24), and an at large(probably another Big 10 or SEC team).

    That will give you 8 on campus matchups in the first round and the top 8 get byes. That would mean the two lowest ranked conference champions would play in the first round and the other 8 would get byes.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Tater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    3,461
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubb Rubb View Post
    It's also a pretty good way to ensure that the best football team rarely would win the national championship.

    Cap it at 16 and leave out the G5. That's the way to go.
    Your best? Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and **** the prom queen.

    A champion should be about awarding the most deserving teams. Idgaf about if you're the best on vegas paper.

    Peyton Manning is the best QB of all time but Tom Brady is the greatest QB of all time. Rings get awarded to those who show up when it matters. This isn't 1990s NASCAR
    "Once the game starts, it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, July 10th, 2010

    "No one ever said it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, June 12th, 2011

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.