-
12-11-2024, 05:06 PM
#621

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
Guys this is just a Zavion situation. And it's going to end up exactly like the Zavion situation. He'll go from 74/932/6 to 43/370/2
Yeah - but that just sucks for us. Because if the situation stays the same, then we end up going 3-9 or 4-8 next season.
-
12-11-2024, 05:08 PM
#622
I?m glad we aren?t overpaying for kids on a 2-10 team.
Also- I question someone?s manhood who goes to a school that passes you up out of high school and last years transfer portal. First Zavion and then Coleman and to an extent-Craver.
-
12-11-2024, 05:09 PM
#623
We're so screwed. When we have to worry about mid-SEC teams taking our stars, I can't see a path back.
-
12-11-2024, 05:10 PM
#624

Originally Posted by
BankerDog
I?m glad we aren?t overpaying for kids on a 2-10 team.
Also- I question someone?s manhood who goes to a school that passes you up out of high school and last years transfer portal. First Zavion and then Coleman and to an extent-Craver.
You forgot they also passed him up when he left JSU to go to Louisville.
-
12-11-2024, 05:11 PM
#625

Originally Posted by
msstate7
We're so screwed. When we have to worry about mid-SEC teams taking our stars, I can't see a path back.
"Mid-Level"......dude they are 20-5 in the last two years. That's not mid level.
-
12-11-2024, 05:13 PM
#626

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
"Mid-Level"......dude they are 20-5 in the last two years. That's not mid level.
Ok, mizzou is top level of the sec.
-
12-11-2024, 05:13 PM
#627

Originally Posted by
msstate7
We're so screwed. When we have to worry about mid-SEC teams taking our stars, I can't see a path back.
You also wanted Jans fired.
-
12-11-2024, 05:16 PM
#628

Originally Posted by
BankerDog
You also wanted Jans fired.
I was an idiot. Coleman to mizzou is the equivalent of cam transferring to mizzou in basketball. I would rip Jans for that, too
-
12-11-2024, 05:18 PM
#629
A few days ago, I read we were keeping craver and Coleman. Today, we have neither. We are going the wrong direction...
-
12-11-2024, 05:19 PM
#630

Originally Posted by
msstate7
A few days ago, I read we were keeping craver and Coleman. Today, we have neither. We are going the wrong direction...
Dude it's a 17 receiver. We put a more than competitive offer to Coleman and had him. Mizzou came in and offered him a chance to go home. There are 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal AT THIS MOMENT and there's 25 entering every day. This is not a big deal.
-
12-11-2024, 05:21 PM
#631

Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Yeah - but that just sucks for us. Because if the situation stays the same, then we end up going 3-9 or 4-8 next season.
I promise that losing Kevin Coleman is not going to win or lose us one game next year. Because we will replace him QUITE EASILY. He's a 17 receiver. This offense creates 65/850/5 TDs like the wishbone creates 1000 yd rushers. And if we didn't have a QB who only knew how to throw a deep ball it would've created more this past year.
-
12-11-2024, 05:22 PM
#632

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
Dude it's a 17 receiver. We put a more than competitive offer to Coleman and had him. Mizzou came in and offered him a chance to go home. There are 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal AT THIS MOMENT and there's 25 entering every day. This is not a big deal.
3rd in sec in receptions
2nd in sec in yards
8th in sec in tds
75 more out there, huh?
-
12-11-2024, 05:24 PM
#633

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
Dude it's a 17 receiver. We put a more than competitive offer to Coleman and had him. Mizzou came in and offered him a chance to go home. There are 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal AT THIS MOMENT and there's 25 entering every day. This is not a big deal.
Was our cash offer same as theirs? I understand you can?t compete with someone wanting to go home but hopefully we did not get outbid.
-
12-11-2024, 05:25 PM
#634

Originally Posted by
msstate7
3rd in sec in receptions
2nd in sec in yards
8th in sec in tds
75 more out there, huh?
He is now 0-2 on predictions
-
12-11-2024, 05:29 PM
#635

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
Dude it's a 17 receiver. We put a more than competitive offer to Coleman and had him. Mizzou came in and offered him a chance to go home. There are 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal AT THIS MOMENT and there's 25 entering every day. This is not a big deal.
Hang on - that is just crazy talk. There are not 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal. The guy went for 74 catches and 932 yards and 6 TDs in the SEC.
I get you are pissed off, I know I am, but to act like this isn't a body blow is crazy talk. The guy was the third-leading receiver in the SEC. I mean come on man, when you say stuff like this, when we have actual good news how are you going to have any credibility?
This isn't Craver, this is most likely a first team pre-season ALL SEC WR next year.
-
12-11-2024, 05:31 PM
#636

Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Hang on - that is just crazy talk. There are not 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal. The guy went for 74 catches and 932 yards and 6 TDs in the SEC.
I get you are pissed off, I know I am, but to act like this isn't a body blow is crazy talk. The guy was the third-leading receiver in the SEC. I mean come on man, when you say stuff like this, when we have actual good news how are you going to have any credibility?
This isn't Craver, this is most likely a first team pre-season ALL SEC WR next year.
Yeah realistically there are 5-6 and my guess is we do not get one. Anderson seems to be the best guy we?re on and I would not say he is Coleman level (yet).
Anyway, not feeling good on JA. I get we have all these connections and family and stuff but dont ever forget we are still MSU.
-
12-11-2024, 05:32 PM
#637

Originally Posted by
msstate7
3rd in sec in receptions
2nd in sec in yards
8th in sec in tds
75 more out there, huh?
Yea. Makai Polk was 17/183/2 the year before he was 105/1036/9. There were 100 Makai Polk's in the portal that year. We almost ended up with another until some transfer rule got in the way. Offenses make receivers 99% of the time. Only elite HOF level receivers make offenses.
-
12-11-2024, 05:33 PM
#638

Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Hang on - that is just crazy talk. There are not 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal. The guy went for 74 catches and 932 yards and 6 TDs in the SEC.
I get you are pissed off, I know I am, but to act like this isn't a body blow is crazy talk. The guy was the third-leading receiver in the SEC. I mean come on man, when you say stuff like this, when we have actual good news how are you going to have any credibility?
This isn't Craver, this is most likely a first team pre-season ALL SEC WR next year.
If there were 75, we wouldn't have to pay him nor would Missouri be trying to outbid us.
-
12-11-2024, 05:35 PM
#639

Originally Posted by
HancockCountyDog
Hang on - that is just crazy talk. There are not 75 Kevin Coleman's in the portal. The guy went for 74 catches and 932 yards and 6 TDs in the SEC.
I get you are pissed off, I know I am, but to act like this isn't a body blow is crazy talk. The guy was the third-leading receiver in the SEC. I mean come on man, when you say stuff like this, when we have actual good news how are you going to have any credibility?
This isn't Craver, this is most likely a first team pre-season ALL SEC WR next year.
Ryan Williams, Cayden Lee, Aaron Anderson, Matthew Golden, Isaiah Bond, Cam Coleman, Keandre Lambert-Smith would all be ahead of him. We're fine. Coleman is a loss and I literally said this one stings, but you just replace him and move on. This isn't a QB, WR is the most replaceable position on the field.
-
12-11-2024, 05:35 PM
#640

Originally Posted by
Cowbell
If there were 75, we wouldn't have to pay him nor would Missouri be trying to outbid us.
Missouri didn't outbid us. Not by a longshot.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.