Quote Originally Posted by Really Clark? View Post
What's so funny and insane with his logic is how he keeps throwing analytics around (with no deep analytical data, just broad study articles) while one of the bigger analytical guys out there, Bartoo, loves Barbay's offensive numbers. Heck he really likes our offensive staff. He keeps concededly stating analytics is on his side when an actual analytics person in Bartoo rates Barbay highly.
Bartoo was higher on Friend and Greg Knox than anyone else on the staff. He did say that he liked our staff and that is was better than last year but he also then said Barbay had a couple of good years but then said small sample size and didn't really sound certain about him good or bad. What I took from it is he is more confident about large sample sizes than anything. Which makes sense.

He didn't say anything about Bumphis and couldn't remember Schmidt's name. I wonder if he thinks Knox is the running backs coach instead of Hughes the way he was talking?