Not Sure How to Feel About This....

[RocketDawg]

Bama is literally the only team that is heads and tails above the others. It does look like UGA is going to make that transition as well. Literally every other team has had up and down seasons and I suspect Bama will go back to being a team that will still compete for championships but not at the level they currently have been once Saban is gone. LSU has not been very good and they have as many if not more built in advantages as Bama. There is still a bunch of parody in the NCAA.

It seems like every thread you start you are asking/ stating that things aren't "fair". Why? Clemson has been extremely competitive and they historically haven't been a blue blood. Oregon had a run and they haven't always been a perennial power. It is possible for teams like state to make a jump. So I don't really see an issue with the way things are. It is just part of it. We aren't a blue blood but that doesn't mean we can't be competitive.

Again, it isn't the NCAA's job to make sure Mississippi State has a shot at a national title. And no organization owes "us" anything. Just enjoy the good years and get over the fact that Bama is going to get more blue chips than we are and they probably always will because as of now they are the more attractive option. Have you ever thought that maybe just maybe playing in front of 100,000 people and using facilities that are top 3 in the country might play a role in a kid wanting to transfer/sign there?

All that is true. I don't mind Alabama being dominantly good, but living here with all the smug attitudes of the sidewalk fans that have never been on campus is a little irritating. I'm sure for those that live in Mississippi there are some of those for Ole Miss ... in fact, I know some are there ... relatives by marriage.

[Percho]

Bama is literally the only team that is heads and tails above the others. It does look like UGA is going to make that transition as well. Literally every other team has had up and down seasons and I suspect Bama will go back to being a team that will still compete for championships but not at the level they currently have been once Saban is gone. LSU has not been very good and they have as many if not more built in advantages as Bama. There is still a bunch of parody in the NCAA.

It seems like every thread you start you are asking/ stating that things aren't "fair". Why? Clemson has been extremely competitive and they historically haven't been a blue blood. Oregon had a run and they haven't always been a perennial power. It is possible for teams like state to make a jump. So I don't really see an issue with the way things are. It is just part of it. We aren't a blue blood but that doesn't mean we can't be competitive.

Again, it isn't the NCAA's job to make sure Mississippi State has a shot at a national title. And no organization owes "us" anything. Just enjoy the good years and get over the fact that Bama is going to get more blue chips than we are and they probably always will because as of now they are the more attractive option. Have you ever thought that maybe just maybe playing in front of 100,000 people and using facilities that are top 3 in the country might play a role in a kid wanting to transfer/sign there?

Just a short question. Do you believe Saban (God) could win a NC at Mississippi State University?

Would MSU have to buy players in order to win with him?

Sorry, 2 short questions.

[Percho]

Does Alabama / their boosters, pay players to come to tideland?

[Percho]

Logan Young

The exception or the rule?

[RocketDawg]

Just a short question. Do you believe Saban (God) could win a NC at Mississippi State University?

Would MSU have to buy players in order to win with him?

Sorry, 2 short questions.

It would be a lot more difficult at MSU at the very least, because we are a much smaller school and always have been and not nearly as well-known nationwide. I don't think they need to pay players to basically get who they want.

[LilSebastian]

It's called Capitalism.

Except the odds are way better in football than the actual economy.

[TUSK]

Except the odds are way better in football than the actual economy.

Nice 36th post +1! You should considering looking in to the Poli Board.

I'll be watching you...