Quote Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us View Post
I'm going to have to disagree with the scholarship part. All that would happen is that the blue bloods would cut the bottom 5 players each class (usually high 3*, sometimes low 4* too) and those players would bump the lowest 5/20 in say, our class. But UGA and Bama would still have same number of 5 and high/medium 4s, and on average they will still beat the low 4/high 3s that got the axe.

It might help a small amount, but there will still be the same incentives to cheat as is there now and UGA would have the same number of .95+ rated guys as they would anyway
Maybe. It would help though.

College football teams don't need 85 scholarships. 70 would be plenty.

I don't think you can remove the incentives to cheat & I don't think they NCAA is capable of stopping it. Therefore, I think all the NCAA can do is try to create rules that hopefully make it impossible to UGA to hoard 4-5 5* running backs on their roster.