-
Originally Posted by
EAVdog
They are just trying to escape LOIC. I think Leo's testimony all but ensures they get hit with LOIC. Which would be awesome, their media all but knew LL would be a Rebel. (Of course they knew what the booster was going to do for him)
I've read that twice today that LLs "lack thereof" testimony might hurt the LOIC charge. Explain that to me, because that makes no sense...would not the other 15-16 Level Ones that didn't involve Leo not still ensure an LOIC charge? Neither USC or Miami had that many Level Ones?!?!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote