Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 63

Thread: Phil Steele's offensive rankings brings some sobering info

  1. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by MetEdDawg View Post
    Also, OM has the recruiting star power at OL, but are we convinced they are going to be better than us on the OL? They gave up more than 2 sacks a game last year. We gave up 1.4 and return 3 starters with a senior at center. I think our OL has much more potential to surprise in the positive than the negative.
    I'd certainly put OM's OL ahead of ours- not sure how you couldnt


    I look for us to be in the 9-11 range on the OL overall

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    10,470
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    I'd certainly put OM's OL ahead of ours- not sure how you couldnt


    I look for us to be in the 9-11 range on the OL overall
    If we can add Hodges I'd call it about even.

  3. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    adding Hodges would be huge- we need an experienced OT badly

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Steele ranks State on offense this way:
    RB-13
    Hahahaha what a ****ing joke!!! Have we ever in the our history had the 13th best rushing attack in the SEC (11th best before the stepsisters got added) oh and our QB almost rushed for the All-Time SEC rushing record for a QB last year but I am sure that doesn't matter cause he is listed as a QB not a RB

  5. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    0
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by Dawg61 View Post
    Hahahaha what a ****ing joke!!! Have we ever in the our history had the 13th best rushing attack in the SEC
    Our RB's were absolutely 13th in the SEC last year

  6. #26
    Senior Member QuadrupleOption's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    895
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Our RB's were absolutely 13th in the SEC last year
    You aren't wrong but he said 'rushing attack', not RBs. We were #4 in total rushing yards and YPC, #5 in rushing yards per game (233), #9 in rushing TDs.

    Fitz's rushing abilities have to be factored into our running game and its expected effectiveness. We won't have the #13 rushing attack in the conference this season.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,715
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Seems like many of you were saying last year how wrong Steele was last year too. Except he ended up being pretty close

    What were his predictions for MSU last season?

  8. #28
    Senior Member FISHDAWG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cookeville, TN
    Posts
    5,376
    vCash
    2076120
    Quote Originally Posted by MoreCowbell View Post
    Arkansas OL was awful last year, Austin Allen was sacked and ungodly amount. He was sacked 34 times for -256 yds.
    I don't think they punted ... not one time against us last year
    OXFORD, Miss. (WTVA) - Ole Miss campus police ask students to behave at future baseball games following a recent incident.
    The university said students were reportedly throwing rocks at Georgia baseball players during last weekend's series.

  9. #29
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,275
    vCash
    3700
    Swap the RB and WR prediction rankings and I could live with it. I really don't give a flying flip what we did throughout the entire year last year at RB because Mullen and Knox wasted tons of carries on Holloway and Shumpert. The future should be based on what happened the last 4 SEC games where Williams had 450 yards rushing and averaged over 6 yards per carry. Plus we have a 4 star backup in Gibson and Hill coming in as a 4 star and the most college ready RB Mullen has signed out of HS. Its a freakin' joke that he has us tied with UNM for last. The Bears don't have a clue what a RB is and only use one as a diversion for their passing game. Now WR is another story, pretty much everything is an unknown there past Gray (given we lost Dear) and even Gray wasn't very effective last year against good competition. Anything better than 13th or 14th at that position as far as a pre-season prediction is gravy. Could be slightly low at OL and maybe even QB but I'm not going to fuss about those too much.

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    3,715
    vCash
    3700
    This is a Mullen team. It will do Mullen team things. 7 win floor 9 win max.

  11. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Aeris Williams is gonna make a lot of writers and posters look like idiots this year. He is about to blow up. Bookmark me

  12. #32
    Senior Member bulldawg28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,819
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    The good side of that is they have 4 starters returning
    My bet of 8 wins still stands and your still running

  13. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    19,817
    vCash
    3100
    Phil Steele? YAWN.

  14. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,466
    vCash
    3100
    During Mullen's years State has finished in the SEC for team rushing: #4 in 2016, #10 in 2015, 3, 8, 9, 6, 2, 4. Our "running game" will be just fine. We have been in the top half of team rushing nearly every year.

    Basing team rushing potential only on returning RB rushing yards means squat. If they don't want to count QB rushing yards for our RB's, then they da*n well better add QB rushing yards to our QB's ranking and put Fitz higher than 4th. FITZ LED THE ENTIRE SEC IN YARDS FROM SCRIMMAGE LAST YEAR. Don't just ignore 1,300 QB rushing yards because QB's are based on passer ratings.

  15. #35
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,275
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by MedDawg View Post
    During Mullen's years State has finished in the SEC for team rushing: #4 in 2016, #10 in 2015, 3, 8, 9, 6, 2, 4. Our "running game" will be just fine. We have been in the top half of team rushing nearly every year.

    Basing team rushing potential only on returning RB rushing yards means squat. If they don't want to count QB rushing yards for our RB's, then they da*n well better add QB rushing yards to our QB's ranking and put Fitz higher than 4th. FITZ LED THE ENTIRE SEC IN YARDS FROM SCRIMMAGE LAST YEAR. Don't just ignore 1,300 QB rushing yards because QB's are based on passer ratings.
    Well to be fair if you took the rushing element away from Fitz in the QB rating there is no way we would have the #4 QB group.

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    12,201
    vCash
    1003200
    Quote Originally Posted by Random Poster View Post
    Steele ranks State on offense this way:

    QB-4
    RB-13
    WR-9
    OL-13

    QB- with the talent at QB in the SEC this year, I have no problems with a #4 ranking heading into the season. Hurts, Allen, Stidham, Fitz, Eason should all have good seasons. Then you look as LSU, SC, Kentucky, Mizzou all return solid QB's as well. Florida finally has a full stable of QB talent. Best QB talent the SEC has had at once that I can remember

    RB- He has us at 13 due to looking at the whole group- and while that may be a little low- its hard to put us in the top 10. State RB's return 777 yards- 11th most in the SEC. Bama, Georgia, Auburn, LSU, A&M, and Mizzou are loaded at RB. Those teams return a minimum of 1600 yards at TB. State fans obviously feel good about our RB situation-especially after starting a munchkin at TB before Williams- but when you look at the entire SEC, its loaded at RB.

    WR- 9th. Thanks Phil- I'll take it. Gray and Mixon should have good seasons. Need a bounce-back season from Myles. Our TE group should play a big part in the success of our passing game this year. Depth at WR is a huge concern- staying injury-free at WR is paramount for this season's success

    OL- 13th. I dont think our OL will be this bad- but there is lots of concern. We dont return many starts- somewhere around 40 or the high 30's total. Our Center will not have played one college play as a Center. Another starter will not have played one college play in college and will be green. There is no depth at OT or C.
    On the bright side- Rankin played well the 2nd half of 2016, Calhoun is a good OG. Jenkins has alot to learn at Center- but he is a good OL player. Williams was improving before his injury last year. We do have OG-depth in case someone goes down there. This group probably struggles the 1st half of 2017 because of the tough early schedule and then comes on the 2nd half of the season.

    There is certain reason for optimism in 2017 and this certainly could be a 7 win team in 2017. However- its not hard to see the concerns for 2017.
    QB-2
    RB-7
    Wr- 4
    OL- 9

    Defense- 5
    Whistleblower exposes: (FISA), Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, 156 other judges, members of Congress, and Donald J. Trump were targeted by the HAMMER.

  17. #37
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,245
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by QuadrupleOption View Post
    You aren't wrong but he said 'rushing attack', not RBs. We were #4 in total rushing yards and YPC, #5 in rushing yards per game (233), #9 in rushing TDs.

    Fitz's rushing abilities have to be factored into our running game and its expected effectiveness. We won't have the #13 rushing attack in the conference this season.
    I've a hard time believing Fitz will be effective "RB" against an average/above average SEC Run D... unless he gets way more accurate & better pass pro...

    That being said, if the pocket breaks down, he might make some big plays...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  18. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    12,201
    vCash
    1003200
    Quote Originally Posted by TUSK View Post
    I've a hard time believing Fitz will be effective "RB" against an average/above average SEC Run D... unless he gets way more accurate & better pass pro...

    That being said, if the pocket breaks down, he might make some big plays...
    Chemistry. It's there. Watch out for Couch and Johnson
    Whistleblower exposes: (FISA), Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, 156 other judges, members of Congress, and Donald J. Trump were targeted by the HAMMER.

  19. #39
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,245
    vCash
    1000619
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    Chemistry. It's there. Watch out for Couch and Johnson
    Is Couch the LB from Auburn, AL????

    don't think I know 'em....
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  20. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,694
    vCash
    3100
    Those WR rankings and RB rankings are both comically wrong for different reasons. Steele is a clown. This shit has no bearing on the outlook for the season for anyone who actually pays attention. If our D improves to the "Grantham standard" of minimum Top 40-50 scoring D and overall D, we will win 8 or 9 games. If it doesn't, we will win 6 or 7. Simple as that. Everything else is just background noise.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.