Quote Originally Posted by Dawgology View Post
This is a move to further delay releasing the NOA and boosters names and it seems that some in the ethics commisssion may be complicit in this. At least that is the way it looks from the outside with them tabling the ruling and accepting a very specific date for release followed up by the timing of this. None of this is ingratiating them with the national media FYI. The gig is up but these folks just can't stop digging the hole deeper.

I was not aware of them tabling the issue, but it was probably tabled because the party requesting the public records apparently agreed to this method of the release that the OM attorney proposed. If there had been a disagreement, I believe they would have ruled on it. OM has definitely been given too much slack in this whole records request snafu.