The playoff..............

[Dawg61]

but thats not the system we have.

Bama, Ohio State, Clemson, Washington. That's what it should be. and will likely be .

They are the best 4 teams. Penn State isn't. End. Of. Debate.

[Quaoarsking]

This is why we need an 8 team playoff. 5 conference champs & 3 at large

1 Alabama
8 Western Michigan (1 bid reserved for G5)

5 Michigan
4 Washington

6 Oklahoma
3 Clemson

7 Penn State
2 Ohio State

Wanted to avoid a rematch, but Ohio State played 3 teams in the field.

[tireddawg]

Isn't it quite possible Penn State could have had 3 losses & still won the conference championship? What if that were the case, would you guys still think they should be in?

[Liverpooldawg]

Ohio state lost by 3 at penn state and beat 3 top 10 teams (Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Michigan)

Penn state did beat Ohio state and Wisconsin, but just to Pitt and 49-10 to Michigan.

But Ohio State didn't even PLAY for the BIG title. PSU won Ohio State's division AND the BIG title. To take OSU and not PSU would make a mockery of the whole thing. I HOPE it happens. THEN we can go to 8 and take all five of the Power Five Champs, the best of the Group of Five, and the next two highest rated teams at large.

[msstate7]

but Ohio State played 3 teams in the field.

That's why Ohio state should be in.

In your best 8 teams...

Bama 0-0
WM 0-0
Michigan 1-1
Washington 0-0
Oklahoma 0-1
Clemson 0-0
Penn state 1-1
Ohio state 2-1

[Quaoarsking]

Isn't it quite possible Penn State could have had 3 losses & still won the conference championship? What if that were the case, would you guys still think they should be in?

Well, they could have also lost to Temple and Kent State and won the Big 10 at 9-4. It's mathematically possible that they could've won the division in a huge 4-5 tie, with 3 non-conference losses, and then won today to be champions at 5-8.

[Liverpooldawg]

1 Alabama
8 Western Michigan (1 bid reserved for G5)

5 Michigan
4 Washington

6 Oklahoma
3 Clemson

7 Penn State
2 Ohio State

Wanted to avoid a rematch, but Ohio State played 3 teams in the field.

THIS IS WHAT WE NEED. Nailed it. I'd even agree with the seeding on this.

[Liverpooldawg]

Isn't it quite possible Penn State could have had 3 losses & still won the conference championship? What if that were the case, would you guys still think they should be in?

NO, but as it stands now THEN you take Oklahoma over Ohio State. WE need 8.

[Quaoarsking]

But Ohio State didn't even PLAY for the BIG title. PSU won Ohio State's division AND the BIG title. To take OSU and not PSU would make a mockery of the whole thing. I HOPE it happens. THEN we can go to 8 and take all five of the Power Five Champs, the best of the Group of Five, and the next two highest rated teams at large.

I don't think that's a very good argument, because the conference championships match up the top team in each division, not necessarily the 2 best teams in the conference. Ohio State had a better conference record than Wisconsin and beat them head-to-head. It was a geographical fluke that Ohio State didn't play in this game.

Personally, I think divisions are awful and that all conferences should abolish them. Take the 2 best teams to the conference championship, or even better, abolish conference championships altogether. That would give an opening to expand the playoff to 8 without the "an extra game is too hard on players' bodies!" argument.

[bluelightstar]

NO, but as it stands now THEN you take Oklahoma over Ohio State. WE need 8.

Um, Ohio St has the head-to-head over Oklahoma under your criteria

[Token Bammer]

I'm not going to say OSU does or does not deserve to be in because that doesn't matter. What does matter is what the committee has done previously. I have this gut feeling it's going to be BAMA, Clemson, Washington, and Penn State with OSU and Michigan outside looking in.

Why? Just look at last years final playoff rankings.

1 CLEM 13-0
2 ALA 12-1
3 MSU 12-1
4 OKLA 11-1
5 IOWA 12-1
6 STAN 11-2
7 OSU 11-1

In the 2015 final poll OSU was 11-1 with same record as this season and finished 7th in the final poll. Who did they finish behind? Well, obviously the top four were conference champions. Then we have Iowa at 5, and Iowa, before losing their conference championship game, really played no one all season. Then OSU finished behind a 2 loss PAC-12 champion Stanford. I think this is the precedent that will be followed.

Well, how do they drop OSU from 2 all the way to 5? I think it's easy. Lots of teams lost last week and that moved OSU up. However, the championship games had not yet been played last week. Last week, OSU was deserving of the #2 team without the consideration of the championships. This week the championships are in play and that will change imo. This week Clemson beat a top 25 team and won their conference. Washington beat a top 10 team and won their conference. PSU, the team that beat OSU and won that division, had an amazing comeback against a top 10 team and won this years "best" conference. OSU? They sat at home on championship Saturday hoping someone would lose. No one did.

Jmo.

[Liverpooldawg]

I don't think that's a very good argument, because the conference championships match up the top team in each division, not necessarily the 2 best teams in the conference. Ohio State had a better conference record than Wisconsin and beat them head-to-head. It was a geographical fluke that Ohio State didn't play in this game.

Personally, I think divisions are awful and that all conferences should abolish them. Take the 2 best teams to the conference championship, or even better, abolish conference championships altogether. That would give an opening to expand the playoff to 8 without the "an extra game is too hard on players' bodies!" argument.

I think every conference should have them. Go to an 8 team field. Take all five P5 champs, the best G5 team, and the best two at large.

[bluelightstar]

We're also forgetting that Penn State is also a *2-loss* team.

[Liverpooldawg]

Um, Ohio St has the head-to-head over Oklahoma under your criteria

My criteria involves conference champs. Oklahoma won theirs, OSU didn't even win their DIVISON.

[tireddawg]

Well, they could have also lost to Temple and Kent State and won the Big 10 at 9-4. It's mathematically possible that they could've won the division in a huge 4-5 tie, with 3 non-conference losses, and then won today to be champions at 5-8.

I know. Just a thought to those that were saying PSU should be in due to being conference champs.

[bluelightstar]

My criteria involves conference champs. Oklahoma won theirs, OSU didn't even win their DIVISON.

So then, they should say the criteria are the 4 best of the 5 conference champions. Otherwise, Ohio St > Penn St.

[TUSK]

It depends...

If the goal is to have the 4 best teams: Bama, OSU, Clemson, PSU/Michigan/Washington
If the goal is to have the most deserving teams: Bama, Clemson, Washington, Penn St./Michigan/OSU

[TUSK]

If you can't even win your division and MAKE your conference championship game you in NO way deserve making the NATIONAL playoff. If Ohio State gets in the system needs to be scrapped. I could see taking a runner up, but Ohio State didn't even play for the BIG title.

No.

[Liverpooldawg]

It's probably academic anyway, BAMA takes them all.

[DancingRabbit]

This year will get the serious talk to an 8 game playoff started. I can't see the benefit of going beyond 8 but in today's environment it's pretty easy to see that the perfect scenario is the five P5 champs, 2 at large P5 teams, 1 non-P5.

It will take a few years but the current contracts won't make the 10-year term. They will be amended or replaced.

This year may also stir some talk about eliminating divisions. Just take the top two teams by tiebreakers.