Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: A little history on 4 and 5 star recruits from MS

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    4,114
    vCash
    13200

    A little history on 4 and 5 star recruits from MS

    In conjunction with the other nice thread about 4-5 stars in our overall recruiting area I decided to see historically how important is to get the highly rated players from MS.

    Looking at 2008-2012 signing classes as we can effectively grade those guys. Also ONLY looking at HS.

    There have been 36 4-5 stars over this period based on 24/7 composite ratings. Of those I count only about 16 had good careers and only about 5-6 guys I would call impact guys that were clearly better than the 3-stars that filled the rest of teh team. There were of course some high talent flameouts like Brassell but ovrerall that's not a real good batting average on impact guys.

    So I think sometimes we over-react to the need to get the instate 4-star guys. Here's the list by year for your own review:


    2008
    Deandre Brown
    Alonzo Lawrence
    Tig Barksdale
    Charles Mitchell
    Templeton Hardy

    2009
    Pat Patterson
    Chad Bumphis
    Fletcher Cox
    Josh Boyd
    Rod Woodson
    Tyler Russell

    2010
    Shon Coleman
    Damien Robinson
    Vince Sanders
    Travis Dickson
    Carlos Thompson
    Kaleb Eulls
    Carlton Martin
    Matt Wells

    2011
    CJ Johnson
    Nick Brasell
    Donte Moncrief
    Tobias Singleton
    Dee Arrington
    M Faciane
    PJ Jones
    Jeremy Whitehead
    Aaron Morris
    James Maiden
    Devin Fosselman

    2012
    Channing Ward
    Anthony Alford
    Quay Evans
    Nick James
    Jeremy Liggins
    Isaac Gross

  2. #2
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    13700
    Played like.....

    2008
    Deandre Brown - 4 star
    Alonzo Lawrence - 2 star
    Tig Barksdale - 3 star
    Charles Mitchell - 4 star
    Templeton Hardy - 2 star

    2009
    Pat Patterson - 2 star
    Chad Bumphis - 4 star
    Fletcher Cox - 5 star
    Josh Boyd - 4 star
    Rod Woodson - 3 star
    Tyler Russell - 3 star

    2010
    Shon Coleman - Tough to rate. Projected 1st rounder this year, but had cancer & lost college playing time. 4 star
    Damien Robinson - 2 star
    Vince Sanders - 4 star
    Travis Dickson - 3 star
    Carlos Thompson - 2 star
    Kaleb Eulls - 4 star
    Carlton Martin - 3 star
    Matt Wells - 4 star

    2011
    CJ Johnson - 4 star
    Nick Brasell - 3 star
    Donte Moncrief - 4 star
    Tobias Singleton - 2 star
    Dee Arrington - 2 star
    M Faciane - 2 star
    PJ Jones - 4 star
    Jeremy Whitehead - 3 star
    Aaron Morris - 3 star
    James Maiden - 2 star
    Devin Fosselman - 2 star

    2012
    Channing Ward - 3 star
    Anthony Alford - 3 star
    Quay Evans - 2 star
    Nick James - 4 star
    Jeremy Liggins - 3 star
    Isaac Gross - 4 star

  3. #3
    Senior Member Big4Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,107
    vCash
    12610
    2013
    Chris Jones
    Tony Conner
    Kailo Moore
    Shumpert
    Buchanan

    2014
    Rod Taylor
    CJ Hampton
    Markell Pack
    Breeland Speaks
    Devin Voorchies
    Jamoral Graham
    Aeris Williams
    Gerri Green

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    306
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by Irondawg View Post
    In conjunction with the other nice thread about 4-5 stars in our overall recruiting area I decided to see historically how important is to get the highly rated players from MS.

    Looking at 2008-2012 signing classes as we can effectively grade those guys. Also ONLY looking at HS.

    There have been 36 4-5 stars over this period based on 24/7 composite ratings. Of those I count only about 16 had good careers and only about 5-6 guys I would call impact guys that were clearly better than the 3-stars that filled the rest of teh team. There were of course some high talent flameouts like Brassell but ovrerall that's not a real good batting average on impact guys.

    So I think sometimes we over-react to the need to get the instate 4-star guys. Here's the list by year for your own review:


    2008
    Deandre Brown
    Alonzo Lawrence
    Tig Barksdale
    Charles Mitchell
    Templeton Hardy

    2009
    Pat Patterson
    Chad Bumphis
    Fletcher Cox
    Josh Boyd
    Rod Woodson
    Tyler Russell

    2010
    Shon Coleman
    Damien Robinson
    Vince Sanders
    Travis Dickson
    Carlos Thompson
    Kaleb Eulls
    Carlton Martin
    Matt Wells

    2011
    CJ Johnson
    Nick Brasell
    Donte Moncrief
    Tobias Singleton
    Dee Arrington
    M Faciane
    PJ Jones
    Jeremy Whitehead
    Aaron Morris
    James Maiden
    Devin Fosselman

    2012
    Channing Ward
    Anthony Alford
    Quay Evans
    Nick James
    Jeremy Liggins
    Isaac Gross
    The problem is recruiting in other states. I think this alone shows you can not be competitive with Alabama and LSU year in and year out counting on MS alone. Especially with the OL talent in state. Like C34 said the other day, 2014 and 2015 class had two great OL prospects and we got neither. We must start recruiting Georgia, Texas, LA, Florida, and Tennessee harder. The OL pool in the state of MS just plain sucks.

  5. #5
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,263
    vCash
    13000
    There's no doubt that most of the best players to come from MS have been 2- and 3-star guys, not 4- and 5-star guys. No clue why that is, but it's true.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,681
    vCash
    13200
    That's why I would rather take a 3* in Louisiana or Alabama over a 3 or sometimes 4* in MS. They play better ball in those states and their guys are little more polished coming out.

  7. #7
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,431
    vCash
    17178
    Almost all of those guys have great size, which tells you what the star sites are looking at.

  8. #8
    Head Elitedawg Croot Reporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    469
    vCash
    12850
    This is gonna sound like a shot at the networks but I don't intend it that way.

    But a lot of The rankings are pretty much controlled by the networks and the guys that cover the schools. For all of Yancys faults, and their are too many to name, he fights like hell for the kids ole miss recruits to get them a proper evaluation. You have some guys, and I am just gonna use Steve as the example because he is very good at it, that know how to get our kids the right evaluation. There are some out there that wouldn't know a superstar from a decent high school player. And then you have the guys that give the stars. Some are pretty good. Some have their jobs because of who their friends are and their rankings are all over the place.

    Mississippi is a hard place to give an honest evaluation on because of several variables. You have some damn good coaches in Mississippi. Damn good. But you have some that could care less whether their kids attend camps or get evaluated. People say we take a lot of lower rated kids. Well if the coaches got their films to the right people then this shouldn't be an issue. It shouldn't be up to Paul or Steve to fight for this kid and a extra star or two. I understand they are teachers and they have lives. But the got into coaching because they love the kids and they love the sport. Don't forget that. Want to see a coach that cares? Follow Discenzo Miller on Facebook or Twitter. I truly believe he gets as much joy out of coaching as he did playing.

    And for the love of all that is holy take the time to update their stats so the kid is ranked and listed where they need to be in stat rankings

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    There's no doubt that most of the best players to come from MS have been 2- and 3-star guys, not 4- and 5-star guys. No clue why that is, but it's true.
    That's because there are usually 5 times as many 3* players in the state. The quantity just means there's a better chance for that group to hold underrated or breakout players. If you looked back and turned each segment into a bell curve the 4* mean would always be higher than the 3* mean, but the top .5% of 3*'s would be better than the top .5% of 4*'s (the bottom .5% of 3*'s would also be much lower). Does that make sense? Mississippi is a poorly scouted state from a fan site perspective, but I believe this would also hold true in any state or on a national level.
    Last edited by Dog; 12-08-2015 at 01:01 PM.

  10. #10
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,431
    vCash
    17178
    Quote Originally Posted by ElitedawgRecruiting View Post
    This is gonna sound like a shot at the networks but I don't intend it that way.

    But a lot of The rankings are pretty much controlled by the networks and the guys that cover the schools. For all of Yancys faults, and their are too many to name, he fights like hell for the kids ole miss recruits to get them a proper evaluation. You have some guys, and I am just gonna use Steve as the example because he is very good at it, that know how to get our kids the right evaluation. There are some out there that wouldn't know a superstar from a decent high school player. And then you have the guys that give the stars. Some are pretty good. Some have their jobs because of who their friends are and their rankings are all over the place.

    Mississippi is a hard place to give an honest evaluation on because of several variables. You have some damn good coaches in Mississippi. Damn good. But you have some that could care less whether their kids attend camps or get evaluated. People say we take a lot of lower rated kids. Well if the coaches got their films to the right people then this shouldn't be an issue. It shouldn't be up to Paul or Steve to fight for this kid and a extra star or two. I understand they are teachers and they have lives. But the got into coaching because they love the kids and they love the sport. Don't forget that. Want to see a coach that cares? Follow Discenzo Miller on Facebook or Twitter. I truly believe he gets as much joy out of coaching as he did playing.

    And for the love of all that is holy take the time to update their stats so the kid is ranked and listed where they need to be in stat rankings
    So true.

  11. #11
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,263
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog View Post
    That's because there are usually 5 times as many 3* players in the state. The quantity just means there's a better chance for that group to hold underrated or breakout players. If you looked back and turned each segment into a bell curve the 4* mean would always be higher than the 3* mean, but the top .5% of 3*'s would be better than the top .5% of 4*'s (the bottom .5% of 3*'s would also be much lower). Does that make sense? Mississippi is a poorly scouted state from a fan site perspective, but I believe this would also hold true in any state or on a national level.
    Yeah, I get this. But I disagree that across the board, the top 3-stars will be better than the top 4-stars, though this does appear to mostly be the case in Mississippi.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.