Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 66

Thread: Torrey Dale...

  1. #21
    Our Pretentious Preacher preachermatt83's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    15,517
    vCash
    165086
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    The coaches named Cleveland defensive player of the game. If you go back and watch the film, you will see that Cleveland played very well.
    I'd like to see a link to this. Until then I call bull crap

  2. #22
    Senior Member Dallas_Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,604
    vCash
    3700
    If Mullen just plays the oldest players, then we are ****ed. That's complete bull shit.

  3. #23
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,210
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Most of their yardage came over the middle of the field, not in Cleveland's zone. Our LB's didn't do a good job of getting enough depth and our safties were playing soft. They caught a TD on Cleveland's side but that was on Market and our LB. It's very tough for the average fan like you and GreenheadDawg to evaluate film.
    This.

    The whole 'Ugh! Our coaches are too stupid to realize that X (who we haven't really seen anything of yet) is clearly a better option than Y' thing is getting old fast.

    I'm not saying the coaches are infallible, but ours make the right decision 95% of the time. They have reasons for every decision they make. People were worried about us using Holloway too much last year as well, and he got 36 of his 45 carries against USM, UAB, South Alabama, UTM, and Vandy. The only other game he got more than 1 carry in was A&M, and he ran it 5 times for 76 yards and a TD in that game.

    Our coaches aren't stupid. They're not going to send Holloway out there to carry it 10-15 times against LSU. The only time he's had more than one carry against a legit opponent, he tore it up. Perhaps this is because the coaches knew of a weakness Holloway could exploit? They don't have any more interest in getting stuffed at the LOS than we do.

  4. #24
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,210
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Dallas_Dawg View Post
    If Mullen just plays the oldest players, then we are ****ed. That's complete bull shit.
    They hardly ever do this when it isn't justified. I'd like for somebody to give me 5 examples. Everybody points to Perkins vs. Robinson, but a) that's about the only real example, and b) perhaps there were reasons for it? Things Perkins did that we didn't see that much that Robinson couldn't do? Or perhaps Robinson just wasn't doing the things he needed to do until last year?

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,269
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msugolf View Post
    And I guarantee you that will be used against us in recruiting.
    This concerns me too, especially with Cam Akers and Kylan Hill. I don't think either one of those guys will want to sit till there JR year to play.

  6. #26
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,044
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    They hardly ever do this when it isn't justified. I'd like for somebody to give me 5 examples. Everybody points to Perkins vs. Robinson, but a) that's about the only real example, and b) perhaps there were reasons for it? Things Perkins did that we didn't see that much that Robinson couldn't do? Or perhaps Robinson just wasn't doing the things he needed to do until last year?
    And it wasn't like Perkins hadn't just come off a 1,000 yard season averaging 5 ypc. And he ran up the middle his Jr as well. People act liked Perkins was a 300 yard back going into his Sr year. Which he played at less than 100%. I like Robinson as a person and he is talented. But I wish he had played with more Perkins attitude. He probably doesn't fade away at the end of last year. And maybe that's why he didn't play more. If he became the guy during Perkins Sr year would he have been as effective last year? Never know and it could have went either way.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,721
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by preachermatt83 View Post
    I'd like to see a link to this. Until then I call bull crap
    Might won't to take that back- because hoops dawg is correct on this one.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,721
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    This.

    The whole 'Ugh! Our coaches are too stupid to realize that X (who we haven't really seen anything of yet) is clearly a better option than Y' thing is getting old fast.

    I'm not saying the coaches are infallible, but ours make the right decision 95% of the time. They have reasons for every decision they make. People were worried about us using Holloway too much last year as well, and he got 36 of his 45 carries against USM, UAB, South Alabama, UTM, and Vandy. The only other game he got more than 1 carry in was A&M, and he ran it 5 times for 76 yards and a TD in that game.

    Our coaches aren't stupid. They're not going to send Holloway out there to carry it 10-15 times against LSU. The only time he's had more than one carry against a legit opponent, he tore it up. Perhaps this is because the coaches knew of a weakness Holloway could exploit? They don't have any more interest in getting stuffed at the LOS than we do.
    Why can't more people see this. Spot on like never before. P.o.d

  9. #29
    Senior Member War Machine Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    N5 London Colney
    Posts
    10,566
    vCash
    3921
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    People are going to figure out eventually that Mullen is going to play older guys no matter what. You are going to have to be an early round draft pick to get on the field early for us ala Jones, Bear, McKinney, etc
    And at some point that bullshit is going to cost us wins and high value recruits. Guys like Peters, McLaurin, etc. don't come to school to sit for a year. Some positions need it, like OL and DL, but others don't. You were just blasting Mullen on Sunday for not playing Lee & Williams. RB ought to be the easiest position in football for guys to play early and/or have an immediate impact. Seniority shouldn't mean dick for that position.
    It's the roller coaster of hope that this program keeps us on that makes it hell being a State fan. - CadaverDawg, 10/15/22


  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,721
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Sacrifice View Post
    This concerns me too, especially with Cam Akers and Kylan Hill. I don't think either one of those guys will want to sit till there JR year to play.
    Talking about taking it to an extreme. People that played a lot as fr, either true or redshirt, r. Brown, Ryan brown, Preston smith, Chris jones, b. Brown, Gabe Myles, Dak, d. Wilson d. Day, b. Claussell, j. Malone, do I need to keep going? Shit. Please stop that we don't play young guys. We play them when they are ready. And lately we have actually had some talent in the upper classes that we didn't have to start puppies. It's not fun starting tr fr on this league. It typically leads to getting ones ass beat. Mullen and company are doing it the right way, I think they have proven it to this point. But carry on. I'm sure someone will. And if it isn't about this, it will be about new tailgating trailers or whatever, just as long as we have plenty to butch about around here.
    Last edited by Homedawg; 09-10-2015 at 03:46 PM.

  11. #31
    Senior Member LC Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    6,089
    vCash
    4938
    Quote Originally Posted by Dallas_Dawg View Post
    If Mullen just plays the oldest players, then we are ****ed. That's complete bull shit.
    It's true that sometimes Coach Mullen plays older players over younger players but I think it's just because he usually trust the older players more. Whether that's right or wrong can be debated but I think it's crazy to think he plays someone based solely on their age.
    He obviously doesn't always play players based on age because a true freshman scored our first offensive touchdown of the year and it wasn't a true freshman that the "experts" thought would play a lot so Coach Mullen must know a little bit about what he is doing.

  12. #32
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Most of their yardage came over the middle of the field, not in Cleveland's zone. Our LB's didn't do a good job of getting enough depth and our safties were playing soft. They caught a TD on Cleveland's side but that was on Market and our LB. It's very tough for the average fan like you and GreenheadDawg to evaluate film.
    Lol, that's cute.

  13. #33
    Senior Member maroonmania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    20,310
    vCash
    3700
    Look, I can at least understand possible reasons for some of the other situations like not playing Lee or Williams or maybe even Gerri Green that much because other players AT THAT POSITION were getting the time. Since when did Torrey Dale become an interior DT?

  14. #34
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Really Clark? View Post
    And it wasn't like Perkins hadn't just come off a 1,000 yard season averaging 5 ypc. And he ran up the middle his Jr as well. People act liked Perkins was a 300 yard back going into his Sr year. Which he played at less than 100%. I like Robinson as a person and he is talented. But I wish he had played with more Perkins attitude. He probably doesn't fade away at the end of last year. And maybe that's why he didn't play more. If he became the guy during Perkins Sr year would he have been as effective last year? Never know and it could have went either way.
    Robinson wasn't our only back that outplayed Perkins to a roughly equal extent

  15. #35
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,044
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by engie View Post
    Robinson wasn't our only back that outplayed Perkins to a roughly equal extent
    What?!? Who? Our running backs were Perkins, Robinson, Shumpert, Griffin, and Milton. Heck Lewis and Damian Williams had more yards than Griffin and Milton. I liked Milton and Griffin but you can't possibly make the argument that either were better options.

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    6,376
    vCash
    2610
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Most of their yardage came over the middle of the field, not in Cleveland's zone. Our LB's didn't do a good job of getting enough depth and our safties were playing soft. They caught a TD on Cleveland's side but that was on Market and our LB. It's very tough for the average fan like you and GreenheadDawg to evaluate film.

    Manny said the LBs came up because they were supposed to come up when the OL is 5 yards downfield. Our LBs read "run" from the OL and came forward as they should have, then they got throws behind them. The lineman downfield rule was not enforced last week.

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    151
    vCash
    3100

  18. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    columbus
    Posts
    80
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins View Post
    Manny said the LBs came up because they were supposed to come up when the OL is 5 yards downfield. Our LBs read "run" from the OL and came forward as they should have, then they got throws behind them. The lineman downfield rule was not enforced last week.
    lineman being downfield had nothing to do with miss tackles and biting the play action every time. Gerri Green gotta get more snaps.

  19. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3,828
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    People are going to figure out eventually that Mullen is going to play older guys no matter what. You are going to have to be an early round draft pick to get on the field early for us ala Jones, Bear, McKinney, etc


    That's a problem though. We don't recruit enough elite talent that we can just have a steady assembly line of elite talent juniors/redshirt sophs ready to step in when out seniors graduate. When we land an elite talent guy, we need that guy on the field more often than not because it's unlikely he's behind another elite talent guy. Like with peters, market and kovan don't have high ceilings. Peters might struggle with the mental side of things, but the sooner he's out there, the sooner he's learning, and his pure athleticism should allow him to make plays our other safeties are just incapable of making, even if they play a little smarter. To maximize out talent on the field, we need to be willing to play our talents regardless of age. Bama can afford to sit 5* talent 2-3 years and still have elite talent. We can't.

  20. #40
    Senior Member Really Clark?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    13,044
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by dawgwood View Post
    lineman being downfield had nothing to do with miss tackles and biting the play action every time. Gerri Green gotta get more snaps.
    Wouldn't lineman being 5 yards down field on play action kind of sell the run even more? If that is what Manny was seeing as posted earlier.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.