Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
Poor instincts. Poor ball skills. Doesn't react quickly enough. His actual physical ability is not bad- see the Iron Dawg Board.

I'm glad he knows the playbook. That doesn't mean he can execute it at a high level. Like I said- maybe coaching is his calling and there is nothing wrong with that.

I don't have my panties in a wad at all. And apparently Greenhead agrees with me. I'm just wondering why some people want to keep going with what isn't working?
Ok, now tell me why you think Peters is better. What have you seen in his college game film? Oh..that's right.. He Has None. Therefore, yet again, you're saying Peters is the better option based on physical talent and hearsay. Todd, the coaches aren't going to put there jobs on the line when there is a better option on the sideline. Especially Manny, Bc he's seen how quick it can end. Peters isn't the better option right now or he'd be playing...or at least be 2nd string. But he's not. And how easily you've gone right past Bryant and put Peters or McLaurin in there. Have you also seen that Perers is better than Bryant "first hand" or through HUDL?

Come on man. You gotta admit you know nothing about how good those freshman are currently at their positions...and definitely not enough to be saying they should start.

But I'm done debating it. It's a pretty easy debate, Bc the coaches see the players everyday, and we don't.