Quote Originally Posted by RoverDog View Post
I wondered the same thing. Wouldn't electronically timed runs be more accurate than hand timed?
None of them are super accurate when it gets down to measuring tenths of a second. It doesn't really matter if he ran a 4.25 or a 4.4, he's really fast. Any sub 4.6 time is really, really fast.

What's valuable about this board for our team isn't the number, but the relative rank. It promotes competition.