Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 48 of 48

Thread: How long until DeAndre Johnson transfers to Ole Miss? And no, I'm not kidding.

  1. #41
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,978
    vCash
    63100
    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
    agreed, except that you are making assumptions that the court should not be making. how do you know she doesn't have a knife, or a gun? how do you know her next move isn't to pick up a bottle and take a swing at him with that? first rule of self defense is don't underestimate the threat. she threatened a punch, he grabbed her wrist and tried to calm her down it looks like (or maybe just talked smack, but this should be viewed in his favor), she took a swing. it looked to me like it connected. it's apparent he did not have room to easily back away. it's apparent she was not going to stop attacking him, and may very well have grabbed a weapon. he was trapped and was hit by a punch and can reasonably assume more or worse was to come. he threw one punch after she started the situation and he took the first opportunity to flee. that's textbook self defense.

    a private citizen is not a cop, a private citizen does not have the training, nor have they accepted the job, of being in danger. they are not equivalent. but since you brought up cops, what if she had taken that swing at a cop? what if he had punched, tazed, or physically harmed her in some other way in response? has anyone ever "wet their pants in anger" over a cop's response to a swing at him that left minimal bruising to the swinger? you take a swing at a cop, he has the right to turn to physical force IMO.
    This pretty much echos the points I made earlier. Also, as PMDog noted, if it was Rhonda Rousey, how could anyone be faulted for protecting themselves in that situation? A punch from her could cause quite a bit of structural damage to one's face. And as Boom just mentioned, what if that girl's next move was to stab at your face with a broken bottle? Is that really out of the realm of possibility? Johnson is obviously a douche, but its still worth discussing, I think....

    Ultimately, there's a reason to hit anybody...Shit, there's a reason to throw and old man down a flight of stairs. Just don't do it.

    Certain women out there need to get it out of their mind that its OK to raise your fists to a man with impunity. Not saying they deserve to get hit back, but as I said earlier, anyone who is gonna dish it out, better be prepared to receive it back. Accountability should extend both ways.

  2. #42
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,535
    vCash
    20439
    Boom and beardo hate women. They must be republicans**

  3. #43
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    19,978
    vCash
    63100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Boom and beardo hate women. They must be republicans**
    Hey now......


    ****

  4. #44
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,265
    vCash
    13000
    Why do legal arguments always come up when discussing whether someone should or shouldn't do something, or whether something is the right thing to do? You can punch a woman in the face who represented no real threat to you after drunkenly and half-heartedly swinging and jump up and yell, 'Self defense!' if you want to. But all you really are is King Douche.

    Also, LOL on the argument that he was trapped and felt threatened by her, then used the first opportunity to flee. He could have fled at any point; he chose to do so only after he hit her because he wanted to feel big and tough after being threatened by a drunk girl but wasn't man enough to stick around and deal with any repercussions. That's all that happened in that video.

  5. #45
    Senior Member BoomBoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Coast
    Posts
    11,450
    vCash
    13200
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Why do legal arguments always come up when discussing whether someone should or shouldn't do something, or whether something is the right thing to do? You can punch a woman in the face who represented no real threat to you after drunkenly and half-heartedly swinging and jump up and yell, 'Self defense!' if you want to. But all you really are is King Douche.

    Also, LOL on the argument that he was trapped and felt threatened by her, then used the first opportunity to flee. He could have fled at any point; he chose to do so only after he hit her because he wanted to feel big and tough after being threatened by a drunk girl but wasn't man enough to stick around and deal with any repercussions. That's all that happened in that video.
    Why can't it be both?

    And yes, the legal way to look at that vid was he was trapped. He had to push his way to that spot, it stands to reason he would have had to push his way out.

  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    547
    vCash
    13200
    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
    Why can't it be both?

    And yes, the legal way to look at that vid was he was trapped. He had to push his way to that spot, it stands to reason he would have had to push his way out.
    From the bar cam video it appears he is black and she is white. Who is the damn racist?


    Never underestimate the power of the Maroon and White Nation.

  7. #47
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,251
    vCash
    1010619
    Quote Originally Posted by hells bells View Post
    From the bar cam video it appears he is black and she is white. Who is the damn racist?
    HB, DeAndre was jus "checkin' her privilege" for her...
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,495
    vCash
    22667
    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
    agreed, except that you are making assumptions that the court should not be making. how do you know she doesn't have a knife, or a gun? how do you know her next move isn't to pick up a bottle and take a swing at him with that? first rule of self defense is don't underestimate the threat.
    So I assume your position would not change if that had been a 12 year old girl.....because after all, how do you know that she doesn't have a grenade in her Hello Kitty backpack?

    Sure, you don't underestimate the threat.....but you are required to assess the threat, have a reasonable fear of harm and respond proportionately.

    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
    she threatened a punch, he grabbed her wrist and tried to calm her down it looks like (or maybe just talked smack, but this should be viewed in his favor), she took a swing. it looked to me like it connected. it's apparent he did not have room to easily back away. it's apparent she was not going to stop attacking him, and may very well have grabbed a weapon. he was trapped and was hit by a punch and can reasonably assume more or worse was to come. he threw one punch after she started the situation and he took the first opportunity to flee. that's textbook self defense.

    a private citizen is not a cop, a private citizen does not have the training, nor have they accepted the job, of being in danger. they are not equivalent. but since you brought up cops, what if she had taken that swing at a cop? what if he had punched, tazed, or physically harmed her in some other way in response? has anyone ever "wet their pants in anger" over a cop's response to a swing at him that left minimal bruising to the swinger? you take a swing at a cop, he has the right to turn to physical force IMO. where do you stand? we have video evidence of cop's doing worse to female protesters who had offered no physical threat in any way, with no consequences, yet you don't see a problem, right?

    anyway, the biggest problem for me, Mr. Small-government Conservative, is that letting the state decide what is "appropriate" self-defense in this way is how you end up getting charged for shooting a burglar in your house. NEVER let the State start parsing and assuming what threat an unprovoked aggressor poses.
    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
    And yes, the legal way to look at that vid was he was trapped.
    I can't decide whether you are just trying to stir the pot, or if you are really this stupid.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.