-

Originally Posted by
Jacksondevildog
I've learned on twitter in 2015 that you should never put your hands on a women, even if she's swinging a battle axe at your head trying to kill you. ZERO excuse I'm told.
what if she were a WM with a a 249SAW.... can I "give her a fresh one", then?
"It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."
No.
Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17
-

Originally Posted by
TUSK
can I "give her a fresh one", then?
I'd slap my mother if she mispronounced consigliere, lol.
Btw, that's a hilarious scene, in a hilarious flick. Well done, Tusk.
-
Nothing a mission trip and some Bible studies with the rev. Freeze can't fix.
-
He is a POS and just graduated HS and in a bar drinking. Not legal either. Woman beater. Dual threat qb. Shit come on down bro we can save you here in Oxford. Buchanan and Kincaide how you loving your career choices?
-

Originally Posted by
BoomBoom
i'm fine with shaming him for that act, a man should know better, but not criminal punishment. in the eyes of the law, she attacked him unprovoked, and he defended himself.
There is a difference in defending yourself and doing what he did. She was a drunk coed. He is a D1 football player. Yes, she took a half hearted swing at him and yes, I would have no problem with her getting an assualt charge against her too, but that does not justify him then punching her in the face as hard as he can. What if that had been at a park and it was a 10 year old kid instead of a college girl? Would he still be justified in trying to see how many teeth he can knock down her throat? If that had been your wife or daughter would you still be ok with it? I do not know what he was charged with but I hope it is felony assault.
-

Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg
There is a difference in defending yourself and doing what he did. She was a drunk coed. He is a D1 football player. Yes, she took a half hearted swing at him and yes, I would have no problem with her getting an assualt charge against her too, but that does not justify him then punching her in the face as hard as he can. What if that had been at a park and it was a 10 year old kid instead of a college girl? Would he still be justified in trying to see how many teeth he can knock down her throat? If that had been your wife or daughter would you still be ok with it? I do not know what he was charged with but I hope it is felony assault.
Self defense is only ok if you're bad at it?
-

Originally Posted by
BoomBoom
Self defense is only ok if you're bad at it?
No, I'm saying there are different levels of self defense. I'm going to tailer my response to the threat level. Being swung at by a drunk college girl that may weigh 120lbs soaking wet is not the same threat as being swung at by a 6'1" 200lbs guy. I find it ironic that you're ok with excessive self defense from this guy hitting a woman like this but almost wet your pants with anger when a cop defends himself from thugs. If he is allowed excessive self defense why not the police that are actually facing a legitimate threat?
-
What if it was Ronda Rousey?
-

Originally Posted by
PMDawg
What if it was Ronda Rousey?
Then she would have thrown a better punch to start things off.
-
Senior Member

Originally Posted by
DCdawg
Didn't the SEC make a rule that teams couldn't accept transfers that had committed serious crimes like his or am I making that up?
I don't know the exact language, but I don't think the SEC is allowed to take transfers that were dismissed from their previous team.
However with this being said, I am sure young Mr. Jordan could transfer to EMCC redeem himself and then transfer to Ole Miss after having serious heart to hearts with the Good Reverend Freeze.
-

Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg
I'm going to tailer my response to the threat level.
This. And I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that the law requires that your response be appropriate (relative to the situation) for it to be considered self defense. And anyone who watched that video and legitimately thinks that Johnson's response was appropriate is an imbecile and probably a piece of shit.
Click HERE for a gif that just shows the altercation. Watch that a couple of times and then tell me that he shouldn't face any criminal charges. Is that chick stupid and skanky? Yup, sure looks like it. But is she a legitimate threat to that guy, or is it believable that he may have considered her to be a legitimate threat? Absolutely not.
-
What the video doesn't show is his mother behind him. Freeze has already got out in front of this by issuing a statement...
"Although deandre isn't one of my players, I'm proud of him for defending his mother. If Fsu doesn't support a player protecting his mother, there's room for deandre to become a rebel here at the flagship..."
Last edited by msstate7; 07-07-2015 at 09:37 AM.
-

Originally Posted by
BoomBoom
Self defense is only ok if you're bad at it?
Self defense in that situation? ****ing stupid. He was an asshole pushing his way to the bar underage first. Then he smokes a chick who gets crossways with him? Not criminal? You might be as ****ing dumb as that asshole is..you people that think this shit is somehow justified need to buried in a deep hole.
-

Originally Posted by
PMDawg
What if it was Ronda Rousey?
He wouldn't have had a chance to assault her. She would have knocked his punk ass out.
-
I agree. He should not have hot her at all.
De'Andre should have walked away from the situation, Hell, he's only 19 and was illegally in the bar to begin with.
-
Straight piece of shit thug.
-
Senior Member
You should never hit a woman..there is absolutely no reason you should ever hit a women..even if she hits you...or if she has a stutter..you should never hit a woman
-Anthony jeselnik
-
whats he doing in a west TN bar, anyway? where is he from and why is he there? Not to mention that the bar has just put itself square in the crosshairs of the TN liquor licensing department.
"When opportunity knocks, ask for two forms of ID, because it is probably just trouble in disguise" - Tickle #Discovery Channel
-
Fsu is harder on hitting a woman than raping one.
-

Originally Posted by
starkvegasdawg
No, I'm saying there are different levels of self defense. I'm going to tailer my response to the threat level. Being swung at by a drunk college girl that may weigh 120lbs soaking wet is not the same threat as being swung at by a 6'1" 200lbs guy. I find it ironic that you're ok with excessive self defense from this guy hitting a woman like this but almost wet your pants with anger when a cop defends himself from thugs. If he is allowed excessive self defense why not the police that are actually facing a legitimate threat?
agreed, except that you are making assumptions that the court should not be making. how do you know she doesn't have a knife, or a gun? how do you know her next move isn't to pick up a bottle and take a swing at him with that? first rule of self defense is don't underestimate the threat. she threatened a punch, he grabbed her wrist and tried to calm her down it looks like (or maybe just talked smack, but this should be viewed in his favor), she took a swing. it looked to me like it connected. it's apparent he did not have room to easily back away. it's apparent she was not going to stop attacking him, and may very well have grabbed a weapon. he was trapped and was hit by a punch and can reasonably assume more or worse was to come. he threw one punch after she started the situation and he took the first opportunity to flee. that's textbook self defense.
a private citizen is not a cop, a private citizen does not have the training, nor have they accepted the job, of being in danger. they are not equivalent. but since you brought up cops, what if she had taken that swing at a cop? what if he had punched, tazed, or physically harmed her in some other way in response? has anyone ever "wet their pants in anger" over a cop's response to a swing at him that left minimal bruising to the swinger? you take a swing at a cop, he has the right to turn to physical force IMO. where do you stand? we have video evidence of cop's doing worse to female protesters who had offered no physical threat in any way, with no consequences, yet you don't see a problem, right?
anyway, the biggest problem for me, Mr. Small-government Conservative, is that letting the state decide what is "appropriate" self-defense in this way is how you end up getting charged for shooting a burglar in your house. NEVER let the State start parsing and assuming what threat an unprovoked aggressor poses.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.