Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: They've gone too far in college baseball...your thoughts?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    297
    vCash
    13200

    They've gone too far in college baseball...your thoughts?


  2. #2
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    34,081
    vCash
    27200
    Good read there Gov....I dont know what the feasibility of going to wood would be for non-BCS teams, because baseball is struggling there as it is. But it can't continue with these current bats. It's like 1915 all over again
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,813
    vCash
    42000
    I have always wanted the change to wood bats. To me that would be the ideal situation, along with the professional ball, but I just don't know how it would work out economically for the small budget schools. I really wish it could be worked out, though.

  4. #4
    Senior Member biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Desoto County
    Posts
    381
    vCash
    15666
    Nice read.....I wish we were playing some gorilla ball tonight.
    Wrap it in Maroon and White

  5. #5
    Senior Member War Machine Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    N5 London Colney
    Posts
    10,609
    vCash
    13921
    We can keep metal bats, but they have to be juiced up a little bit. There's got to be a happy medium in aluminum bats between Gorilla Ball and what we're seeing now. You can't tell me it doesn't exist. A team batting .183 should NEVER be close to winning the CWS.
    It's the roller coaster of hope that this program keeps us on that makes it hell being a State fan. - CadaverDawg, 10/15/22


  6. #6
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,012
    vCash
    13700
    I think they are going to change the balls- not the bats. The seams are raised right now- I think you are going to see the ball wound a little bit tighter and the seams tighter.

  7. #7
    Senior Member FlabLoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    3,648
    vCash
    13330
    Agree completely. When a power hitter squares up on a ball and hits the sweet spot just to see it caught on the warning track or sooner - that's just awful. It has ruined the game.

    I say go to wood. Small schools can't afford it? Too bad. Baseball may be all-American, but it isn't an inalienable right.

  8. #8
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,491
    vCash
    20439
    Quote Originally Posted by FlabLoser View Post
    Agree completely. When a power hitter squares up on a ball and hits the sweet spot just to see it caught on the warning track or sooner - that's just awful. It has ruined the game.

    I say go to wood. Small schools can't afford it? Too bad. Baseball may be all-American, but it isn't an inalienable right.
    Any chance MLB could help with wood bats?

  9. #9
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,430
    vCash
    17178
    Todd, I was told that's definitely happening next year. They're going to the pro ball with flatter seams next season. It'll help some, but the balls that are being hit squarely now still aren't going to get out of the park next year.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,012
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Any chance MLB could help with wood bats?
    It has been discussed. But, it's not a priority. The issue is not the cost. Heck, schools were able to afford wood bats back in the 40's. The issue is the quality of the wood bats. MLB gets the best of the best, followed by the minors. College would be getting near the bottom of the barrel.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    34,081
    vCash
    27200
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I think they are going to change the balls- not the bats. The seams are raised right now- I think you are going to see the ball wound a little bit tighter and the seams tighter.
    still wont help much- guys squaring up balls still arent going out
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,813
    vCash
    42000
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    still wont help much- guys squaring up balls still arent going out
    Don't know if any of you guys saw it, but there was a segment during the pre-game on ESPNU regarding the new bats, the existing college ball and the general lack of offense since the new bat was implemented. A scientific study was done comparing the collegiate ball and the MLB ball that indicated the MLB ball travels about 25' further on a squared up contact. That would have put several more balls out of TD Ameritrade during this CWS. 25' is significant.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,495
    vCash
    22667
    Quote Originally Posted by State82 View Post
    Don't know if any of you guys saw it, but there was a segment during the pre-game on ESPNU regarding the new bats, the existing college ball and the general lack of offense since the new bat was implemented. A scientific study was done comparing the collegiate ball and the MLB ball that indicated the MLB ball travels about 25' further on a squared up contact. That would have put several more balls out of TD Ameritrade during this CWS. 25' is significant.
    I saw it, and based on what was said, it would definitely make a difference. One other thing they said was that the threads being 0.5 mm higher on the college balls, resulted in a 25% increase in drag on the ball.

  14. #14
    Senior Member FISHDAWG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cookeville, TN
    Posts
    5,405
    vCash
    2032985
    if a pitcher makes a mistake then he should pay for it, that's just part of the game ... what we saw with UCLA was when their pitcher would make a mistake - they were rewarded with an easy out ... somehow that just doesn't fit in my baseball equation

  15. #15
    Senior Member Ghost of Hank Flick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    209
    vCash
    13376
    I think they've got to change the seams next year and we'll see what happens. At the CWS they need to move the fences in because the wind blowing in is killing balls as much as the baseball or new bats. If they moved the fences in 5-10' and changed the seams I think we would have had 12-15 home runs instead of just 3.

  16. #16
    General Public Political Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    General Public
    Posts
    17,430
    vCash
    17178
    wow, hard to believe the seams would cause the ball to fall 25' short of where it would otherwise land. That's a lot. As long as someone other than Joe Schad reported it, Ill take it at face value.

    With pitching likely going to be our strong point next season, this may not be the best move. Hard to feel that way now since it cost us the National Title, but you have to wonder if we would have made it to the title game with balls flying out of the park for LSU, Or State, and NC.

  17. #17
    Senior Member FlabLoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    3,648
    vCash
    13330
    Tighter seams mean a more compressed ball that is essentially a harder baseball which will come off the bat faster.

  18. #18
    Senior Member LiterallyPolice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    542
    vCash
    13285
    I'm not a physicist, but I would imagine tighter seems would also mean less movement on pitches. In other words, it would be easier to square one up.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    454
    vCash
    12710
    Quote Originally Posted by LiterallyPolice View Post
    I'm not a physicist, but I would imagine tighter seems would also mean less movement on pitches. In other words, it would be easier to square one up.
    that's exactly what I was thinking. it will make pitchers less effective.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,114
    vCash
    24190
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandman14 View Post
    that's exactly what I was thinking. it will make pitchers less effective.
    Which is good for us. Our pitchers will be better than most other pitchers so it will hurt us less.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.