Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Judge rules Charles Bediako no longer eligible to play for Alabama

  1. #1
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    77,542
    vCash
    20439

    Judge rules Charles Bediako no longer eligible to play for Alabama

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/oth...d=BingNewsSerp

    ...

    Good, hopefully the NCAA is about to cut out some of this nonsense

  2. #2
    Senior Member BeardoMSU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The gettin' place
    Posts
    20,345
    vCash
    63100
    Fingers crossed the same for Chambliss....bc **** OM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    18,126
    vCash
    12510
    Finally a judge with a brain and balls.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    3,743
    vCash
    13000
    Let the GaMES begin*******

  5. #5
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,182
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardoMSU View Post
    Fingers crossed the same for Chambliss....bc **** OM.
    It is two entirely separate issues. That is what a lot of State fans are not seeing. The Bediako case and the Chambliss case are only similar in that the NCAA denied them and they went to a state court.

    Charles Bediako has played in the G League for 3 years and then decided he wanted to come back for an extra year. He was basing his argument on earning power.

    Chambliss, to my knowledge, has never played in the NFL, Arena football, UFL, etc and is trying to get an extra year of eligibility on the basis of Ferris St messing up his records.

    They are not remotely the same situation. It is why Chambliss will win and he will play for OM in 2026.

    And I do think we?re about to see an NFL guy do this btw. I fully expect there will be a player that was making 7 figures at [insert school] and he goes to the NFL, gets a chance with a team, plays a preseason game, and gets cut. That guy will sue to come back on the basis of the NCAA limiting his earning potential. That is when this thing will get real interesting. The NCAA got a big win yesterday with Bediako. That was the case they needed to go their way, not the Chambliss case. They fully expect that injunction to be granted.
    Last edited by StarkVegasSteve; 02-10-2026 at 08:46 AM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    77,542
    vCash
    20439
    The ncaa moved quickly and got the injunction lifted quickly. The cases are different, but the speed at which this was handled is the news to me. Hopefully they're about to start doing this on all infusions.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Posts
    42
    vCash
    11000
    Does the NCAA do anything about the games he played for Bama and they won? I did not keep up with the impact he had but had but if an illegal player made me lose a game I would be upset.

  8. #8
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    77,542
    vCash
    20439
    Quote Originally Posted by SPDawgs View Post
    Does the NCAA do anything about the games he played for Bama and they won? I did not keep up with the impact he had but had but if an illegal player made me lose a game I would be upset.
    I don't think so. That's how the ncaa needs to solve this though. If they rule a player ineligible, and you get an injunction, any wins with that player have to be vacated. Do this and get the injunctions settled quickly

  9. #9
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,182
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    The ncaa moved quickly and got the injunction lifted quickly. The cases are different, but the speed at which this was handled is the news to me. Hopefully they're about to start doing this on all infusions.
    They won't. They had a little bit better of a case with the Bediako stuff because he had forgone his eligibility and had went into the draft. It's why the Baylor kid had a little bit more of a leg to stand on. He had never gone to college.

    The Bediako win was important for future cases of G League guys who left early trying to come back(i.e. Amari Bailey) but not much else. It's good that the NCAA finally won a case, but they're going to lose many more before they win another one.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    10,415
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    It is two entirely separate issues. That is what a lot of State fans are not seeing. The Bediako case and the Chambliss case are only similar in that the NCAA denied them and they went to a state court.

    Charles Bediako has played in the G League for 3 years and then decided he wanted to come back for an extra year. He was basing his argument on earning power.

    Chambliss, to my knowledge, has never played in the NFL, Arena football, UFL, etc and is trying to get an extra year of eligibility on the basis of Ferris St messing up his records.

    They are not remotely the same situation. It is why Chambliss will win and he will play for OM in 2026.

    And I do think we?re about to see an NFL guy do this btw. I fully expect there will be a player that was making 7 figures at [insert school] and he goes to the NFL, gets a chance with a team, plays a preseason game, and gets cut. That guy will sue to come back on the basis of the NCAA limiting his earning potential. That is when this thing will get real interesting. The NCAA got a big win yesterday with Bediako. That was the case they needed to go their way, not the Chambliss case. They fully expect that injunction to be granted.
    Don't think anyone said the same. Still don't make Chambliss right. He has been denied 3 times for a reason. They got it right the first 3 times. This is BS too for different reasons.

    This is a State board so we don't pull for anything to go well for OM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    10,415
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I don't think so. That's how the ncaa needs to solve this though. If they rule a player ineligible, and you get an injunction, any wins with that player have to be vacated. Do this and get the injunctions settled quickly
    Agree they have to establish some order at some point.

  12. #12
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,182
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by R2Dawg View Post
    Don't think anyone said the same. Still don't make Chambliss right. He has been denied 3 times for a reason. They got it right the first 3 times. This is BS too for different reasons.

    This is a State board so we don't pull for anything to go well for OM.
    I just think we need to be real careful being all high and mighty. Because I think there is a pretty good chance that we are going to try and get Jahron Manning back through the same process.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Fairhope, AL
    Posts
    8,650
    vCash
    23720
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardoMSU View Post
    Fingers crossed the same for Chambliss....bc **** OM.
    You have such a beautiful way with words.

  14. #14
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    77,542
    vCash
    20439
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    I just think we need to be real careful being all high and mighty. Because I think there is a pretty good chance that we are going to try and get Jahron Manning back through the same process.
    I want it to end for everyone. I also want to limit free transfers to one.

  15. #15
    Senior Member TheLostDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,360
    vCash
    12725
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    It is two entirely separate issues. That is what a lot of State fans are not seeing. The Bediako case and the Chambliss case are only similar in that the NCAA denied them and they went to a state court.

    Charles Bediako has played in the G League for 3 years and then decided he wanted to come back for an extra year. He was basing his argument on earning power.

    Chambliss, to my knowledge, has never played in the NFL, Arena football, UFL, etc and is trying to get an extra year of eligibility on the basis of Ferris St messing up his records.

    They are not remotely the same situation. It is why Chambliss will win and he will play for OM in 2026.

    And I do think we?re about to see an NFL guy do this btw. I fully expect there will be a player that was making 7 figures at [insert school] and he goes to the NFL, gets a chance with a team, plays a preseason game, and gets cut. That guy will sue to come back on the basis of the NCAA limiting his earning potential. That is when this thing will get real interesting. The NCAA got a big win yesterday with Bediako. That was the case they needed to go their way, not the Chambliss case. They fully expect that injunction to be granted.
    So we should have gotten Spivey to lawyer up?

  16. #16
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    45,419
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLostDawg View Post
    So we should have gotten Spivey to lawyer up?
    Probably so. Although I have heard different things about who was at fault there. Some say it was Spivey's fault but I have to believe that the NCAA rules are so complicated you need someone that can guide you through the process if you are a player. Not sure if TCU dropped the ball or MSU.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    10,415
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    I just think we need to be real careful being all high and mighty. Because I think there is a pretty good chance that we are going to try and get Jahron Manning back through the same process.
    Not being high and mighty. We sat back and watched everyone else cheat for decades. Got to establish some fair rules and enforce. Chambliss for Manning yeah that is an even swap.***

  18. #18
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    13,182
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by R2Dawg View Post
    Not being high and mighty. We sat back and watched everyone else cheat for decades. Got to establish some fair rules and enforce. Chambliss for Manning yeah that is an even swap.***
    Oh we cheated too. We just didn't do it as well most of the time. I mean we tried to underpay on Cam Newton. We wouldn't pay what we needed on Chris Jones until literally the last second. We have overpaid guys that weren't worth it plenty of times.

    We cheated. We just sucked at it.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    15,027
    vCash
    518138426
    Quote Originally Posted by EdwardDrayton View Post
    You have such a beautiful way with words.
    Oh I can come up with a great Blazing Saddles SLim Pickens Quip for this one about Mr Taggarts description of a lady of the night and Hedleys way with words,

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    10,415
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Oh we cheated too. We just didn't do it as well most of the time. I mean we tried to underpay on Cam Newton. We wouldn't pay what we needed on Chris Jones until literally the last second. We have overpaid guys that weren't worth it plenty of times.

    We cheated. We just sucked at it.
    Never said we didn't cheat; it is all relative. Compared to Olemiss we ain't never cheated. That is why they need the Chambliss thing shoved at them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.