Just gonna leave this here...

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...ractice/page/6

Funny, in regards to us. he says it is the "Grand Canyon" to go from a lower tier bowl team to an SEC West contender, but yet we had a 4th quarter lead on the road against Auburn, and played Bama very well.

And, we also beat Ole Miss, who doesn't have a right tackle, with our 3rd string QB playing most of the game, yet for some unknown reason, the "Grand Canyon" between a lower tier bowl, which the Music City is, and contending is much less for them.

I have shamefully been reading Sallee for a few years now, and here is his biggest problem. He isn't consistent. He uses one piece of criteria or checklist to explain why one team is ranked where they are, and completely different set of criteria/checklist to explain another team that has the same talent and flaws as the other team.

This leads to massive inconsistency in logic, and contradictory statements and rankings. Simply, he tries to pump out as many articles as he can, without spending the necessary time or concentration to write a good one.