-

Originally Posted by
BrunswickDawg
I think I've heard that statement made about every QB2 who was behind the QB1s on that list from StarkvegasSteve
Keytaon was the most talented QB we've ever signed, but behind Nick
Robertson was the most talented QB we've ever signed, but behind Will
Dak was lightyears ahead of Russell (who at the time was statistically the best QB in our history).
York was the most talented QB we've ever signed, but behind Fant.
Fant was the most talented QB we've ever signed, but behind Madkin.
Madkin was the most talented QB we've ever signed, but behind Wyatt
Rodney Hudson was the the most talented QB we've ever signed, but behind Sleepy and Greg Plump.
And I didn't say KT is the most talented qb we've ever signed; that's dak. I said KT is immensely more talented than Shapen, which he is. Sorry if that bothers you
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
How do you know he leads?
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
And I didn't say KT is the most talented qb we've ever signed; that's dak. I said KT is immensely more talented than Shapen, which he is. Sorry if that bothers you
KT is more talented than Dak physically.
-

Originally Posted by
DEDawg
How do you know he leads?
93.4> 91.1. And again, I know he isn't qualified. Still, you can only judge a player by what he does when he plays, and his play is elite is so far. I know it wouldn't stay at 93.4 QBR if he played full time, but the small sample is good enough for me to want to see a bigger sample. Perhaps if he played all the time, it would drop to 60.1 (65th nationally) like Shapen.
-

Originally Posted by
confucius say
KT is more talented than Dak physically.
Perhaps. I'm biased towards dak. And it's totally unfair for me to see the end dak and compare him to the true freshman KT
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Perhaps. I'm biased towards dak. And it's totally unfair for me to see the end dak and compare him to the true freshman KT
KT is more agile physically than Dak was and is.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
And I've said over-and-over that he doesn't qualify. He doesn't decide his playing time, but he has been excellent when he does. I see you totally gloss over a td rate of 57.1% per drive in sec play.
I don't disagree that he has been very good - situationally. But you are also ignoring how much a situational QB he's been. Other than Alcorn, the first 5 games he played in packages specifically to gain short yardage and or short yardage scores. That is going to heavily skew a stat that places large portion of their measurement on scoring plays. He has the advantage of getting the ball on in those situations versus playing 90% of the snaps and taking all the hits like Shapen has.
Does he pass the eye test as a guy that is immensely talented? Yes. Is he long term more talented then Shapen?? Possibly. Maybe even probably. But, we've also thought that many times before only to end up booing the guy as a Senior.
"After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
- Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18
-

Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
Most of those are due he doesn't step up in the pocket. He makes himself a sitting duck. I would hate to be a lineman for him.
This
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
And I didn't say KT is the most talented qb we've ever signed; that's dak. I said KT is immensely more talented than Shapen, which he is. Sorry if that bothers you
KT is the most talented QB we have probably ever signed. Dak was a work in progress.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Perhaps. I'm biased towards dak. And it's totally unfair for me to see the end dak and compare him to the true freshman KT
Just compare him to freshman 3-star dak.
-
How many sacks will Mizzou record this weekend? I'd say 5-6.
-

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
In the last game Shapen was sacked 1 more time than KT. And by the way, Shapen has already been sacked 31 times- 6 more than he has any season of his career and we still have two games left.
Our issue isn't Shapen. It isn't him holding onto the ball too long. And it sure as hell isn't his lack of mobility. It's our offensive line absolutely sucks. And KT's lack of accuracy offsets the production from his legs relative to what Shapen gives us in terms of accuracy.
Shapen is part of the issue. So is the OL. Two things true at once. He does hold the ball too long. On the long KT throw, KT threw it much quicker with guy in his face. Shapen would have been in fetal position with a sack.
Shapen does not presnap read the D. Obvious blitz is coming and he does not adjust to throw quick. That is on Shapen not the OL.
KT pocket awareness is much better even as a freshman. He feels the rush and makes them pay. Only time he got sacked there was not where to run as he tried.
-

Originally Posted by
EdwardDrayton
KT is more agile physically than Dak was and is.
No doubt, Dak ran like a FB but was still effective.
-

Originally Posted by
Cowbell
KT is the most talented QB we have probably ever signed. Dak was a work in progress.
We don't know yet if KT is the most talented. He probably is the most agile. But he still has much to prove to show he can be better than Dak.
-

Originally Posted by
R2Dawg
Shapen is part of the issue. So is the OL. Two things true at once. He does hold the ball too long. On the long KT throw, KT threw it much quicker with guy in his face. Shapen would have been in fetal position with a sack.
Shapen does not presnap read the D. Obvious blitz is coming and he does not adjust to throw quick. That is on Shapen not the OL.
KT pocket awareness is much better even as a freshman. He feels the rush and makes them pay. Only time he got sacked there was not where to run as he tried.
His pocket awareness and poise is encouraging to be so young and inexperienced.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
93.4> 91.1. And again, I know he isn't qualified. Still, you can only judge a player by what he does when he plays, and his play is elite is so far. I know it wouldn't stay at 93.4 QBR if he played full time, but the small sample is good enough for me to want to see a bigger sample. Perhaps if he played all the time, it would drop to 60.1 (65th nationally) like Shapen.
But you just pulled 1 non qualified player who is higher and compared it to the qualified list. You would have to go individually look at every single backup QB in the country to know he is the highest
-

Originally Posted by
DEDawg
But you just pulled 1 non qualified player who is higher and compared it to the qualified list. You would have to go individually look at every single backup QB in the country to know he is the highest
You're missing the whole point of it: KT has been outstanding, and his qbr backs it up. But if it makes you happier, KT's qbr (in a SSS) is better than the #1 qualifier.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
93.4> 91.1. And again, I know he isn't qualified. Still, you can only judge a player by what he does when he plays, and his play is elite is so far. I know it wouldn't stay at 93.4 QBR if he played full time, but the small sample is good enough for me to want to see a bigger sample. Perhaps if he played all the time, it would drop to 60.1 (65th nationally) like Shapen.
numbers don't lie. the decision to not play the best player only b/c they are younger is a high school level coach approach, basic, and unable to process the enormous upside. we've seen it on the field the last several weeks, kamario should start and play the entire game.
-

Originally Posted by
R2Dawg
Shapen is part of the issue. So is the OL. Two things true at once. He does hold the ball too long. On the long KT throw, KT threw it much quicker with guy in his face. Shapen would have been in fetal position with a sack.
Shapen does not presnap read the D. Obvious blitz is coming and he does not adjust to throw quick. That is on Shapen not the OL.
KT pocket awareness is much better even as a freshman. He feels the rush and makes them pay. Only time he got sacked there was not where to run as he tried.
exactly. just watch the ARK & UGA drives again. it jumps out. Kamario can make every throw this offense requires. If kamario starts and gets those 5 to 6 drives in the 1H that shapen has been wasting, we likely score 21+ each of those 1Hs.
-

Originally Posted by
justwin
numbers don't lie. the decision to not play the best player only b/c they are younger is a high school level coach approach, basic, and unable to process the enormous upside. we've seen it on the field the last several weeks, kamario should start and play the entire game.
Yesssssss. The guy that is paid millions and winning games depends on him to continue to make millions of dollars- not to mention he has a drive for winning- plays the inferior QB that he watches day after day in practice, on gameday, and on film
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.