Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 56 of 56

Thread: Day 1 of reason why we will beat Texas A$M

  1. #41
    Senior Member Maverick91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    2,398
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    We are better this year.
    They are better this year.

    But the game isn't played in a vacuum.
    We were at home last year.
    They are at home this year.
    We are coming off an emotionally and physically draining game.
    They are off a bye.
    If they were at home last week and lost in OT with numerous injuries while we were on a bye and the game was in Starkville, I'd have it closer.
    They lost a pretty physical game to Auburn last week. They aren't coming off a bye.
    Their home turf is about as scary as a dead 🐭. It holds a tone of folks but they just wait for them yell leaders to tell them when to make noise.

    I'm not looking at it in a vacuum. I see us how we played last year it was within ten. To how we are playing this year and we are 10 times better as a program. And they look about the same.

  2. #42
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,036
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick91 View Post
    They lost a pretty physical game to Auburn last week. They aren't coming off a bye.
    Their home turf is about as scary as a dead ��. It holds a tone of folks but they just wait for them yell leaders to tell them when to make noise.

    I'm not looking at it in a vacuum. I see us how we played last year it was within ten. To how we are playing this year and we are 10 times better as a program. And they look about the same.
    I agree that Kyle Field isn't intimidating at all. Unless you get freaked out by weird chants which is maybe what they're going for. To me it seems like the fans are kind of far from the field.

  3. #43
    Senior Member BulldogBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    The Maxyard
    Posts
    10,400
    vCash
    21814
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Because he was given a directive from boosters to go get him. They heard Mississippi State was going to get him and we?re not going to lose a QB to us. Cohen has infected them to the point of anything we have or want, they have to have it.
    Hmmmm... see below

    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    Are you saying Freeze and the Auburn staff were not allowed to choose a QB they wanted? That place is crazy
    Yes

    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick91 View Post
    So you are saying we sent a trojan horse ? Cohen is coming through. Evil laugh
    Not true. But it ought to be!

    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    The boosters run that place and have really since Jay Jacobs left. Jacobs always had them somewhat under control and they got rid of him so they could install Allen Greene, who they fired to get Cohen because he hired Harsin.
    See above. Yes, I've never known of any school where boosters micromanaged things like they do at Auburn. Maybe it was better under Jacobs but that was an anomaly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I agree that Kyle Field isn't intimidating at all. Unless you get freaked out by weird chants which is maybe what they're going for. To me it seems like the fans are kind of far from the field.
    I think fans are close enough to the field. I sat on row 3 right behind the MSU bench in our 35-14 win there in 2017. We were right there. As for the environment, it's hard to put a finger on. Maybe whether it is intimidating or not isn't the right thing to wonder about. If I had to choose a way to put it, I would say this: It is just not that...hostile. Maybe it is for the Longhorns or others. Maybe they just think we are beneath their ire. Talk to any of them and they just can't believe that we have about the same record against them as some blueblood SEC teams since they've joined the conference. Tell them we're 5-5 in the last decade, and they just don't remember it that way. They won't call you a liar, they just don't remember it being like that. Aggies are weird. Passionate. Delusional. But not hostile.
    Last edited by BulldogBear; 09-30-2025 at 08:22 PM.
    The Liberation will not be televised--- when it arrives like lightning in the skies!

  4. #44
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,036
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by StarkVegasSteve View Post
    Arnold was pushed on Freeze. Everything I had heard at the time, which is another reason I was so damn adamant we would get Arnold, is that Freeze wanted either Fernando Mendoza or Maalik Murphy. Arnold cannot run that offense, and Freeze knew that, because that offense makes the QB make a ton of reads pre snap and Arnold is not used to that. The only offense he can really run effectively is ours. They are now having to completely change everything about what they do. If he continues to struggle, Freeze will pull the plug and go to Deuce Knight.
    Part of that is on Arnold and his camp too. QB is one position where the offense has to fit the QB's skill set. Like- you wouldn't ask Dan Marino to run the wishbone. But he would probably be pretty badass in the Air Raid. As Clint Eastwood said- a man has to know his limitations. Same with any QB.

    It goes to show you how teams get so fixated on stars sometimes that they end up screwing themselves and the player over.

  5. #45
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,036
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by PGHBulldogBG View Post
    I would much rather have Shapen at QB knowing his injury risk than Arnold. I am glad he went to Auburn and we didn't get stuck paying him a bunch of money. Their defense is good though and I think it will allow them to win 7 games this year, but I am not sure if that will be enough to keep Freeze employed.
    Thing is I doubt that Shapen stays if we get Arnold. I think we came out OK, but I also think that Arnold would have been better off coming to MSU because of the scheme fit.

  6. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,772
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick91 View Post
    They lost a pretty physical game to Auburn last week. They aren't coming off a bye.
    Their home turf is about as scary as a dead 🐭. It holds a tone of folks but they just wait for them yell leaders to tell them when to make noise.

    I'm not looking at it in a vacuum. I see us how we played last year it was within ten. To how we are playing this year and we are 10 times better as a program. And they look about the same.
    That's right on Auburn. Not sure why I thought bye.
    That helps.
    I think we cover but lose.

  7. #47
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    34,099
    vCash
    27200
    They had a Bi the week before Auburn
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  8. #48
    Senior Member Maverick91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    2,398
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by confucius say View Post
    That's right on Auburn. Not sure why I thought bye.
    That helps.
    I think we cover but lose.
    Dang. I thought I had you bought in.

  9. #49
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,265
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by parabrave View Post
    freeze made the mistake of getting Jackson Arnold. The Okiies were glad to be rid of him. He is a slower version of Tyler Russell.
    Wut

    Arnold is an infinitely better athlete than Russell.

  10. #50
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    11,944
    vCash
    95610
    Quote Originally Posted by smootness View Post
    Wut

    Arnold is an infinitely better athlete than Russell.
    Yea Tyler was a statue in the pocket. Arnold may not throw a great ball, but he's 100x the athlete Tyler was on his absolute best day. And that's not a knock on Tyler, he just wasn't a dual threat guy.

  11. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,772
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick91 View Post
    Dang. I thought I had you bought in.
    Haha. It would not shock me. I just don't expect it. I do expect us to cover though unless nearly all of the hurt guys cannot go.

  12. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2025
    Posts
    152
    vCash
    11000
    Speaking of 95 MPH fastballs to the feet of a WR running a slant that came up in another thread about MVB, why have we totally abandoned that part of the game this season? We aren't running any slants or short crosses. We are having Shapen stand back there and wait for long developing routes to form or nothing else. And we are only running one or 2 bubble screens.

    Coleman feasted on YAC from shorter passes last year and it seems like that concept is totally gone this season. Waiting for 3 or 4 long passes to hit on the teams we have coming up for the rest of the season seems like a recipe for failure.

  13. #53
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,036
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by BravesDoggy View Post
    Speaking of 95 MPH fastballs to the feet of a WR running a slant that came up in another thread about MVB, why have we totally abandoned that part of the game this season? We aren't running any slants or short crosses. We are having Shapen stand back there and wait for long developing routes to form or nothing else. And we are only running one or 2 bubble screens.

    Coleman feasted on YAC from shorter passes last year and it seems like that concept is totally gone this season. Waiting for 3 or 4 long passes to hit on the teams we have coming up for the rest of the season seems like a recipe for failure.
    My guess is that is on the receivers and maybe the offensive line to a degree.


    Could be based on coverage some as well.

  14. #54
    Senior Member Maverick91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    2,398
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by BravesDoggy View Post
    Speaking of 95 MPH fastballs to the feet of a WR running a slant that came up in another thread about MVB, why have we totally abandoned that part of the game this season? We aren't running any slants or short crosses. We are having Shapen stand back there and wait for long developing routes to form or nothing else. And we are only running one or 2 bubble screens.

    Coleman feasted on YAC from shorter passes last year and it seems like that concept is totally gone this season. Waiting for 3 or 4 long passes to hit on the teams we have coming up for the rest of the season seems like a recipe for failure.
    Really great point. I have thought the same thing. Are we running it and he isn't throwing it or are we not running it at all?

  15. #55
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2025
    Posts
    152
    vCash
    11000
    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick91 View Post
    Really great point. I have thought the same thing. Are we running it and he isn't throwing it or are we not running it at all?
    I'm not liking the trend that its Seydou this game, Brennen/Evans that game, back to Seydou, etc.

  16. #56
    Senior Member Maverick91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    2,398
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by BravesDoggy View Post
    I'm not liking the trend that its Seydou this game, Brennen/Evans that game, back to Seydou, etc.
    I know there are hot targets each game but yeah consistency is nice

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.