-
01-15-2025, 02:21 PM
#3101
-
01-15-2025, 02:23 PM
#3102
-
01-15-2025, 02:27 PM
#3103
Originally Posted by
KB21
....and Evans is a Dawg!
We are so back
-
01-15-2025, 02:33 PM
#3104
Originally Posted by
KB21
....and Evans is a Dawg!
BOOM!!
I really think he is going to be a great slot receiver for us.
-
01-15-2025, 02:42 PM
#3105
-
01-15-2025, 02:49 PM
#3106
Not the portal, but stone Blanton declared for the draft
-
01-15-2025, 02:52 PM
#3107
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Not the portal, but stone Blanton declared for the draft
WTH is he thinking? He's not likely to get drafted unless he runs a whole lot faster than I think he can.
-
01-15-2025, 02:53 PM
#3108
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Not the portal, but stone Blanton declared for the draft
Well crap! One step forward two steps back.
-
01-15-2025, 02:57 PM
#3109
Well he's married or about to be, so I guess he's ready to move on with life.
Although I think he would make more with us than he will trying to play in the nfl.
I guess I could argue that his production in 2025 will not be what it was in 2024, so his stock may be as high now as it will ever be.
-
01-15-2025, 03:03 PM
#3110
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Well he's married or about to be, so I guess he's ready to move on with life.
Although I think he would make more with us than he will trying to play in the nfl.
I guess I could argue that his production in 2025 will not be what it was in 2024, so his stock may be as high now as it will ever be.
Honestly, with the additions of Smith, Gullette, and Lockhart along with Tillman, I'm not sure Stone was guaranteed to start this year.
-
01-15-2025, 03:37 PM
#3111
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Well he's married or about to be, so I guess he's ready to move on with life.
Although I think he would make more with us than he will trying to play in the nfl.
I guess I could argue that his production in 2025 will not be what it was in 2024, so his stock may be as high now as it will ever be.
He seems to be another Jett Johnson type player that is a really good college player that probably doesn't have the speed to do much in the NFL. I'm not even sure he could make a team so yes, college NIL would seem to likely be his best option money wise.
-
01-15-2025, 04:06 PM
#3112
Originally Posted by
confucius say
Not the portal, but stone Blanton declared for the draft
What in the hell is he thinking?
-
01-15-2025, 05:14 PM
#3113
I don’t think Stone was going to be playing as much and read the writing on the wall. Hope he does well.
-
01-15-2025, 05:50 PM
#3114
he ain't good as or smart as Jett at the position. good luck to him
-
01-15-2025, 06:16 PM
#3115
Originally Posted by
KB21
Honestly, with the additions of Smith, Gullette, and Lockhart along with Tillman, I'm not sure Stone was guaranteed to start this year.
I agree. Stone?s not a good tackler, he likes to hit runners to the ground instead of wrapping up and driving runners to the ground. Let me back that up by saying that his defensive line did not help him out. No one needed double teaming EVER!
Last edited by Thick; 01-15-2025 at 06:19 PM.
-
01-15-2025, 07:21 PM
#3116
Originally Posted by
Goldendawg
I saw Cunningham not only at Toledo, but a couple of other games. No doubt he didn't like what he saw. Who did at 2-10 & 0-8 in SEC. Many players have no desire to play for a big time losing program (at this point) and be part of a total rebuild. NIL $ will be really big and comparable at best for us and most want to play for championships and national exposure in a winning program. We have a "longn row to hoe" in this NIL/Portal crazy world, l;ike it or not.
The good news is we can still get him in a year or two if we start winning
-
01-15-2025, 08:05 PM
#3117
Originally Posted by
Turfdawg67
The good news is we can still get him in a year or two if we start winning
You ideally want guys on year 3,4,5. Who gives af if you have them Year 1/2.
"Once the game starts, it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, July 10th, 2010
"No one ever said it's gonna be easy." - Lebron, June 12th, 2011
-
01-15-2025, 09:32 PM
#3118
Originally Posted by
Thick
I agree. Stone?s not a good tackler, he likes to hit runners to the ground instead of wrapping up and driving runners to the ground. Let me back that up by saying that his defensive line did not help him out. No one needed double teaming EVER!
He literally led the sec in tackles. I don’t agree with the take he wasn’t a good tackler.
-
01-15-2025, 09:40 PM
#3119
Originally Posted by
maroonmania
Well crap! One step forward two steps back.
More like 2 steps forward, 1 step back.
Stone was productive, but we can upgrade from an athletic ability standpoint. Smith and Tillman give you a higher upside.
-
01-15-2025, 11:40 PM
#3120
Originally Posted by
bigbub50
He literally led the sec in tackles. I don’t agree with the take he wasn’t a good tackler.
That is not always a good positive Stat. Like when it's a LB on a 2-10 team and his tackles are 6 to 8 yards downfield! 😳😳
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote
