-

Originally Posted by
BorneDawg
Cuz, what's your solution then? We can keep firing head coaches every year.... No big time coach will come(not that we could pull one anyways) if we give them one year and boom you're gone! As bad (as many think Leach's coaching style was) he at least demanded effort and discipline from his players.... to me Morehead and Arnett have been the worst hire and Croom is not far behind(at least he beat Bama).... As bad as we have been we have played harder this year as opposed to least year...
The solution is to give Lebby the resources to succeed next year (portal), and if he doesn't make a bowl, fire him and hope the next guy can win.
-

Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
The solution is to give Lebby the resources to succeed next year (portal), and if he doesn't make a bowl, fire him and hope the next guy can win.
I'm sure we'll give him 2025 and 2026 before we can end this nightmare because we have to pretend to show continuity.
-

Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
The solution is to give Lebby the resources to succeed next year (portal), and if he doesn't make a bowl, fire him and hope the next guy can win.
Lebby will improve the team next year but I doubt he wins more than 4 or 5.
-
It's hard to not like the way Brady Cook brought that Mizzou team back to win @ Aub, being so banged up. He will get it done again.
41-31 Mixxouri.
-
If we go 2-10, it will be the first year since 2002 that we have not won a SEC in a season. I dare say about any staff could have beaten only E KY and UMASS this year. Lebby deserves more time, but I have seen no improvement except in the passing game (QB/WR only). Need a real DC asap and perhaps a couple of other position coaches.
-

Originally Posted by
Goldendawg
If we go 2-10, it will be the first year since 2002 that we have not won a SEC in a season. I dare say about any staff could have beaten only E KY and UMASS this year. Lebby deserves more time, but I have seen no improvement except in the passing game (QB/WR only). Need a real DC asap and perhaps a couple of other position coaches.
I agree about giving him another year with a min of 4-5 wins next year and bowl game in 3rd year.... to do that he will need to replace a couple coaches and use NI money to bring in better players though
-

Originally Posted by
BorneDawg
I agree about giving him another year with a min of 4-5 wins next year and bowl game in 3rd year.... to do that he will need to replace a couple coaches and use NI money to bring in better players though
The funds are there to bring in better players. We have plenty of that. It's actually very impressive what Charlie and his team have done from that standpoint. It just comes down to executing on the recruiting trail from the coaches.
-

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
The funds are there to bring in better players. We have plenty of that. It's actually very impressive what Charlie and his team have done from that standpoint. It just comes down to executing on the recruiting trail from the coaches.
Well, sounds like they need to produce if the resources are there. We just have no hype around the program like we did with Mullen.
-

Originally Posted by
SPMT
Well, sounds like they need to produce if the resources are there. We just have no hype around the program like we did with Mullen.
Mullen didn't have hype until he beat Ole Miss. We had been outscored 73-24 in the two games prior and most people thought OM was going to dirtroll us. I mean we had been close in a game against LSU and didn't get blown out by Florida. I guess you can call that hype but Mullen didn't have a signature win until the Egg Bowl.
-

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
Mullen didn't have hype until he beat Ole Miss. We had been outscored 73-24 in the two games prior and most people thought OM was going to dirtroll us. I mean we had been close in a game against LSU and didn't get blown out by Florida. I guess you can call that hype but Mullen didn't have a signature win until the Egg Bowl.
******* first year was pretty hype and you could see the potential.
-
Maybe you saw it. I saw us not get dusted by the teams we usually got dusted by and win the Egg Bowl. We just had come off having nothing for almost a decade and Mullen finally provided hope. I don't think it was hype, it was hope.
-

Originally Posted by
StarkVegasSteve
Mullen didn't have hype until he beat Ole Miss. We had been outscored 73-24 in the two games prior and most people thought OM was going to dirtroll us. I mean we had been close in a game against LSU and didn't get blown out by Florida. I guess you can call that hype but Mullen didn't have a signature win until the Egg Bowl.
This is my recollection as well.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.