View Poll Results: Do you support dropping down to 1 college athletics program in the state?
- Voters
- 28. You may not vote on this poll
-
Strong Yes
-
Lean Yes
-
Indifferent
-
Lean No
-
Strong No
-
Member
I can understand why some MSU fans would be in favor of this proposal. However, there is no way to get Ole Miss or any of its fans on board.
They are currently ranked number five in the nation and absent an unanticipated collapse will make the playoffs. They are raking in tons of cash. Why would they want to share it?
OM is in line to be a member of the next super conference should it materialize. What could it possibly gain by a merger?
-

Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
This idea is not new. People have talked about it for decades. But I think its time has come.
A few facts to keep in mind:
- College students take a lot of online classes these days.
- Football players in particular take a lot of online classes.
- The NCAA allows players from other campuses of the same college to play on the main campus's team. For example, someone who took classes at the MSU campus in Meridian could play on our teams.
- Mississippi is the poorest state in the country, and it's one of smallest in population to have a Power 4 school (and unlike Nebraska and West Virginia, we don't have just 1)
- Ole Miss is doing well in the NIL right now (top 20), but probably can't sustain it indefinitely. We are not doing as well, but combined we would be a top 10 NIL program.
- The state government has been talking for years about building a nice new football stadium in Jackson
- The rivalry between Ole Miss and Mississippi State is toxic (though arguably not as much as it was last decade). However, most all of us here have friends who like Ole Miss, and vice versa. It doesn't need to be toxic.
- Depending on the year, Mississippi is #1 or close to #1 in NFL players per capita. There's plenty of talent here.
So you can see where this going -- we should consider dropping down to 1 college athletic program in the state, and get everyone unified behind it.
- The state would have to reorganize the university administration. We have 8 separate institutions, not 8 branches of the same institution. This would not be unprecedented - for example in North Carolina, there is the UNC system, and the main campus (Chapel Hill), NC State, Charlotte, Appalachian State, Wilmington, etc., are part of it.
- The football team would all need to live in Jackson and take online classes at whichever university they want to. This wouldn't be a huge change from their student lives for most of them though.
- I think it's safe to say the majority of fans in Starkville or Oxford most Saturdays would have a shorter drive to go to Jackson than to either campus.
- You can't call the team the Rebels or Bulldogs - you'd need a new color scheme that doesn't match any of the current universities. You'd need a new nickname too. But you could keep Bully, the Shark, etc., as the costumed mascots. Why not have a bunch of them? And the team would have to be just known as "Mississippi"
- The stadium could seat 100,000 and be near the top of the FBS in attendance.
- Instead of sniping at each other for players, we would be a unified state taking on the world.
- With the streamlining of expenses, there would be leftover money to add more sports, like men's soccer, lacrosse, etc.
- You'd probably want to do the same with basketball and everything else. Maybe keep the baseball programs separate so that Starkville and Oxford don't lose out completely.
- A lot of people wouldn't be happy when this was announced, but after a couple of years, we'd all love it.
- The SEC would be happy to go down to 1 SEC school but still keep the whole state engaged.
These are the cons I can think of:
- Both universities have spent a lot of money on stadiums that would no longer host games. Maybe they could play 1 non-conference game a year away from Jackson, rotating between Oxford, Starkville, and Hattiesburg or something. And maybe you could play state championships or even NCAA soccer games there.
- The student sections may not be as lively since they'd mostly be coming in from 2+ hours way. The campuses could probably pay to bus students in though.
- There's no guarantee we'll be a great program if we do this. Arkansas, Minnesota, and West Virginia aren't great programs. Nebraska is a shadow of what it once was. On the other hand, all of those programs would almost certainly be in a worse situation if they had to share their states with another power conference school.
- A lot of people nationwide would probably still informally call the new team "Ole Miss" and see it as a continuation of that program rather than a merger of all programs. We would need to make it clear that that's not the case.
Should we do this? Yes. I said we should do this 20 years ago. I said we should 10 years ago when we were both top 10 teams. But given the modern unregulated NIL landscape, we need the entire state to unite around the same program.
This is NOT a surrender. This is just recognizing the realities of the world we live in. Companies merge all the time. Sports teams in other countries merge. Mississippi would have the chance to be a national power.
In summary, yes we SHOULD have only one major state university but we don?t and we won?t in our lifetime. If we did, we?d have more wealth, NIL, continuity, etc.
For some reason our state has never been in control by long term thinkers. Maybe MS ancestors were full of hoarders and morons. Thankfully, mine aren?t from here!
IF WE HAD OIL THIS WOULD ALL BE MOOT.
-

Originally Posted by
SPMT
In summary, yes we SHOULD have only one major state university but we don?t and we won?t in our lifetime. If we did, we?d have more wealth, NIL, continuity, etc.
For some reason our state has never been in control by long term thinkers. Maybe MS ancestors were full of hoarders and morons. Thankfully, mine aren?t from here!
IF WE HAD OIL THIS WOULD ALL BE MOOT.
Not oil. We need to find a trove of EV batteries buried in the Indian Mound under Scott Field And Dudy Noble! 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳
-

Originally Posted by
CaptainObvious
Not oil. We need to find a trove of EV batteries buried in the Indian Mound under Scott Field And Dudy Noble! 🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳
That?ll work too
-
This is literally the dumbest idea I've ever seen posted on a message board.
-

Originally Posted by
scottycameron
This is literally the dumbest idea I've ever seen posted on a message board.
Thank you. BY the way are you going to release an ne J.A.T. in the future?
-
In this hypothetical scenario USM would remain untouched, and the combined University of MSU and UM would keep the bulldog as mascot, but everything else would unanimously go to Oxford, except of course, DNF. It doesn't matter if we have the better football stadium, or at least the better stadium after the next big upgrade. But that's how it would go down.
-
-
-

Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
They won't though, because the vast majority of our fans aren't going to start rooting for Ole Miss and going to their games.
A merged super team is the only way to get all Mississippians on board.
They would not need our existing fans. They would get every in state recruit and gain support throughout the state. Every person who cheers for both, which is a lot, would be all Ole Miss and kids growing up would become Ole Miss fans. You better believe it could happen and they would not need us.
-

Originally Posted by
BeardoMSU
Thanks, Q...
Yeah bad look
-

Originally Posted by
MoreCowbell
They would not need our existing fans. They would get every in state recruit and gain support throughout the state. Every person who cheers for both, which is a lot, would be all Ole Miss and kids growing up would become Ole Miss fans. You better believe it could happen and they would not need us.
This is exactly what happens if we don't get it together, and we get cut in the next round of conference realignment.
-
We've got some genuine 17tards
-
I'm not generally in support of Q's approach - but I understand where it is coming from....
Folks - this is the type thinking and support that is going to separate MSU from the top tier https://t.co/ZN9dAMH97x https://x.co...vQdOlLgHO91_bA
The TL;DR version - Tennessee is raising ticket prices and donation requirements an average of 14.5% 4.5% is for facilities and athletic department expenses. 10% is specifically a "talent fee" to pay the players.
Even student tickets will go up to $25 a game. With the 75,000 season ticket holders they have, ticket/donation changes are estimated to bring in $7.5 million in revenue to use toward the $22m in player pay.
At UGA, Season Tickets will be going up to $80 a game ($560 a season) plus a seat donation that ranges from $410-$7,500 per seat. The kicker is that to have enough "points" to get season tickets, you have to be somewhere in the neighborhood of $15,000+ in lifetime giving to qualify for seats (and those are not the good seats). https://georgiadogs.com/news/2024/9/...or-2025-season
Meanwhile, at MSU.....
It doesn't matter what we get from NIL. Doesn't matter what we generate in revenue. Won't really matter how we recruit or what coach we hire.
What the Top 20 schools have done is forced through a model where only they can compete. Period. The fanbase size, facility size, general revenue, and hefty donation revenue puts them so far ahead.
We spent more on Football last year then any year ever - $33 million. That is an increase of 231% since 2010. Meanwhile, the median SEC program spent $54 million - and this is just in straight expenses, not NIL.
In athletics overall, we are $50 million under the median SEC athletic department in expenses; and $70 million behind in median revenue.
These are not gaps that we are going to bridge. You can't "diamond in the rough" your way to competing once every four years when we have a load of 5th year Seniors. In economy of scale, it really means that the odds are basketball may be the only sport we can regularly compete in - IF we have a great coach and can somehow grab talent. Baseball will start to wither on the vine with 35 scholarships going into effect - simply because we won't be able to push the envelop anymore via facilities and investment like we could even 5 years ago. Everyone in the SEC will have what we have or more - and the LFL and big attendance won't save it.
I hate being so pessimistic. But the numbers are right there in front of us, flashing big red warning signals, and we as an institution and fanbase are just the "I'm fine" meme while its on fire all around us.
"After dealing with Ole Miss for over a year," he said, "I've learned to expect their leadership to do and say things that the leadership at other Division I schools would never consider doing and to justify their actions by reminding themselves that "We're Ole Miss.""
- Tom Mars, Esq. 4.9.18
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.