Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Batting order in Regional

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,444
    vCash
    2510

    Batting order in Regional

    Should be:

    1. Mershon, .335/443
    2. Jordan, .339/452
    3. Hujsak, .350/441
    4. Hines, .245/333
    5. Chance, .281/373
    6. Larry, .257/400
    7. Kohler, .242/354
    8. Powell, .289/367
    9. Downs, .288/387


    - best 3 hitters get the most ABs
    - Hines sandwiched between 2 guys that don't K
    - Downs is healthy. Gives you a guy at the bottom that can get on base
    - clearly our best 9 bats

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2024
    Location
    Hoover, AL
    Posts
    15
    vCash
    1000
    Great lineup for offense, but the problem with this is defense. Larry is a liability at 2B, and if he's DH, where would you put Chance and Downs?

  3. #3
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,086
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by SteelCityDawg View Post
    Great lineup for offense, but the problem with this is defense. Larry is a liability at 2B, and if he's DH, where would you put Chance and Downs?
    Larry is fine at 2B. You make a change there late if needed. We need runs and defense isn't a significant fall off there to warrant putting a dead out in the starting lineup. Especially when Long is playing.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,444
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by SteelCityDawg View Post
    Great lineup for offense, but the problem with this is defense. Larry is a liability at 2B, and if he's DH, where would you put Chance and Downs?
    Liability is too strong a word for Larry. He's not a plus defender but he's good enough. He also seems to hit better when he's playing the field. As Cooter said, you could insert Cupp late if needed.

  5. #5
    Senior Member StarkVegasSteve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    11,426
    vCash
    98074
    Quote Originally Posted by SteelCityDawg View Post
    Great lineup for offense, but the problem with this is defense. Larry is a liability at 2B, and if he's DH, where would you put Chance and Downs?
    Larry would be fine at 2B. He had a bad game against UT, but if you DH him then you either have to put Pulliam at 2B or put Chester at 2B. Then you'd have to take out Downs, which isn't the worst thing. He's a K machine and we already have 3 of those in the lineup with Jordan, Hines, and Kohler.

  6. #6
    Senior Member KOdawg1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    11,738
    vCash
    966500
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Liability is too strong a word for Larry. He's not a plus defender but he's good enough. He also seems to hit better when he's playing the field. As Cooter said, you could insert Cupp late if needed.
    We've been subbing Chester in

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,444
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by KOdawg1 View Post
    We've been subbing Chester in
    Cupp had been hurt. I think he's slightly better if he's on the 27 man roster. But yeah, Chester or Cupp if needed. What we don't need is Larry at 2B with Pulliam at DH like we inexplicably had in the SECT.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Saltydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,721
    vCash
    3706
    Agreed and the book is now out on Pulliam. He hits the breaking ball like Jordan.
    "The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)

  9. #9
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,497
    vCash
    17200
    1. Dirtbag
    2. Trout
    3. Hugesack
    4. Baby Cerrano
    5. Little Richey
    6. RagArm
    7. Memphis
    8. Down Syndrome/Stevens
    9. Catcher
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,444
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    1. Dirtbag
    2. Trout
    3. Hugesack
    4. Baby Cerrano
    5. Little Richey
    6. RagArm
    7. Memphis
    8. Down Syndrome/Stevens
    9. Catcher
    That's ok. My lineup is better because I have separated DJ and Hines in the order. Also, this isn't 1995. In the modern era, you put your best hitter in the 2 hole and despite his recent struggles and K rate, that is still DJ. Trout has the 6th best OBP in my order..that's not 2 hole.

  11. #11
    Senior Member MoreCowbell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    1,920
    vCash
    3100
    Jordan got a hit and 2 RBI his last plate appearance so hopefully that gave him his confidence back heading into regional

  12. #12
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,497
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    That's ok. My lineup is better because I have separated DJ and Hines in the order. Also, this isn't 1995. In the modern era, you put your best hitter in the 2 hole and despite his recent struggles and K rate, that is still DJ. Trout has the 6th best OBP in my order..that's not 2 hole.
    It's ok to disagree.

    I like a 2 hole that doesnt K. That's Trout. He is going to put the ball in play. Gives us a Run-N-Hit option there also after Dirtbag steals 2nd. Also- Dirtbag on base opens some holes for him to help.

    Jordan/Hines at the plate will determine how far we go. Either they get it done or they dont.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,444
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    It's ok to disagree.

    I like a 2 hole that doesnt K. That's Trout. He is going to put the ball in play. Gives us a Run-N-Hit option there also after Dirtbag steals 2nd. Also- Dirtbag on base opens some holes for him to help.

    Jordan/Hines at the plate will determine how far we go. Either they get it done or they dont.
    That's valid. I disagree, but at least there is some rationale. DJ has 77 K's and Hines has 73 so I don't like them back to back. I like giving DJ protection with Hujsak too. Chance doesn't need protection-teams pitch to him. But at least we agree that Powell and Long can't be in the lineup together.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    410
    vCash
    3000
    Who is little Richey?

  15. #15
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,497
    vCash
    17200
    https://cdispatch.com/sports/just-li...seball-masher/

    Hunter's Dad should have been hitting 5th behind Clark and Palmeiro but chose to go to MC to stay in Jackson.
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  16. #16
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,086
    vCash
    52714
    Quote Originally Posted by KOdawg1 View Post
    We've been subbing Chester in
    Its also Lemonis

  17. #17
    Senior Member Cooterpoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    13,086
    vCash
    52714
    I'd go:
    Mershon
    hugesack
    Jordan
    Hines (but not sure why)
    Larry
    Chance
    Kohler
    Powell
    Downs

  18. #18
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,429
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    It's ok to disagree.

    I like a 2 hole that doesnt K. That's Trout. He is going to put the ball in play. Gives us a Run-N-Hit option there also after Dirtbag steals 2nd. Also- Dirtbag on base opens some holes for him to help.

    Jordan/Hines at the plate will determine how far we go. Either they get it done or they dont.
    I agree. 2 hole needs to be a guy that can handle the bat, not k, bunt, hit and run,etc. Dakota is the opposite of a 2 hole hitter. More fit to hit cleanup with his power but high k rate.

    We've gotta separate Hines and Jordan, 2 ks back to back has killed us a lot this year

  19. #19
    Senior Member basedog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,101
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    I agree. 2 hole needs to be a guy that can handle the bat, not k, bunt, hit and run,etc. Dakota is the opposite of a 2 hole hitter. More fit to hit cleanup with his power but high k rate.

    We've gotta separate Hines and Jordan, 2 ks back to back has killed us a lot this year
    I sure hope they both or at least one gets hot, May be too far in their heads now. Time off would or may have helped. Hit the ball where it's pitched and choke up.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,444
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Commercecomet24 View Post
    I agree. 2 hole needs to be a guy that can handle the bat, not k, bunt, hit and run,etc. Dakota is the opposite of a 2 hole hitter. More fit to hit cleanup with his power but high k rate.

    We've gotta separate Hines and Jordan, 2 ks back to back has killed us a lot this year
    Any model you use has DJ as 2 hole. Your definition of 2 hole is more like 80's-90's style of managing.

    Interesting the best lineup according to Moneyball type App is:
    1. Mershon
    2. DJ
    3. Chance
    4. Hujsak
    5. Joe Powell
    6. Kohler
    7. Larry
    8. Hines
    9. Downs

    This lineup is projected to score 6.555 runs per game.

    My lineup is projected to score 6.54 runs per game, ha.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.