Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 265

Thread: Chadwell to MSU

  1. #201
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,837
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Cleared of wrongdoing
    You're either a bigger dipshit than usual, or you think we all are. Nobody would sincerely label that as "cleared of wrongdoing"

  2. #202
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,465
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    Well we have to have 10 to pay off the old stafff. And I know we not have a candidate worth more than 8 at best a year. That's 42. So we won't be needing the entire pie. Might have to spend some more on a small buyout. We shall see
    Where are you getting 42 from? I see 10 and 8.

  3. #203
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,465
    vCash
    3700
    I'd be Ok with Lebby as long as he nails his DC hire.

  4. #204
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,719
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    Where are you getting 42 from? I see 10 and 8.
    8 per year equals 32. 10 for buyout. 42. Sorry wasn't clear in my post.

  5. #205
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,653
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    You're either a bigger dipshit than usual, or you think we all are. Nobody would sincerely label that as "cleared of wrongdoing"
    literally what the court said- I'm good with it. But damn man- if we get to Lebby on the list after missing on the 6-7 other targets- we have to just hold our nose and do it
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  6. #206
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    3,095
    vCash
    3000
    word

  7. #207
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    129
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    literally what the court said- I'm good with it. But damn man- if we get to Lebby on the list after missing on the 6-7 other targets- we have to just hold our nose and do it
    I don't think the issue is Lebby. It's Briles. If that post is the ruling by the court, it doesn't clear him in my eyes. IF a college aged girl reported a sexual assault to him and he did nothing about it, such as report it to the police or administration, he's a POS. You don't have to have training to be a decent human being. If we get down that far and Lebby is there then so be it. Briles should be nowhere around the program in my opinion.

  8. #208
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,837
    vCash
    52060
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    literally what the court said- I'm good with it. But damn man- if we get to Lebby on the list after missing on the 6-7 other targets- we have to just hold our nose and do it
    It "literally" isn't though, not even close. You're referring to one particular case out of dozens, and a plaintiff losing a case does not and has never meant that the defendant was "cleared" of anything, just that that particular instance isn't proven. But even if you want to go so far to say he's exonerated on that one case, there's still dozens of others where he's not.

    The texts between him and his AD (who still works as Liberty's AD btw) make it explicitly clear that Briles was covering up crimes and intimidating victims - he comes right out and says it in them. You can read about them here: https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2017...court-records/ (2017) or the ones that just dropped this month: https://defector.com/the-just-reveal...at-youd-expect

  9. #209
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    2,839
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    We'll just disagree. A successful veteran HC helping his son-in-law be successful as well is a big deal.

    Nobody on campus and around the program would give a shit who Briles was. These kids dont care today
    Have you had a serious conversation where you LISTENED to a 16 - 21 year old zoomer? Kids these days are some of the most passionate and radical for any cause.

    Any amount of Briles and Lebby would bring severe backlash. I know my donataions and support for the football team would dry up until my university got its shit together. There are several whom feel the same way. It's the worst hire we can reasonably make. And it scares me that none of our big mouth pieces are squashing it. It's not only a risk in the football since, it's a horrendous risk in the public perception arena.

    I'm disappointed it's gotten this far.

  10. #210
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,465
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Homedawg View Post
    8 per year equals 32. 10 for buyout. 42. Sorry wasn't clear in my post.
    Thanks!

  11. #211
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7,837
    vCash
    52060
    I won't hold Lebby responsible for his father-in-law's poor behavior, but I would definitely expect Briles not to set foot on campus as anything other than a fan during Lebby's entire tenure.

  12. #212
    Senior Member Catfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    1,661
    vCash
    7164452
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    I won't hold Lebby responsible for his father-in-law's poor behavior, but I would definitely expect Briles not to set foot on campus as anything other than a fan during Lebby's entire tenure.
    Bingo!

  13. #213
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,719
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Quaoarsking View Post
    I won't hold Lebby responsible for his father-in-law's poor behavior, but I would definitely expect Briles not to set foot on campus as anything other than a fan during Lebby's entire tenure.
    The fact Lebby is being held for what his father in law did is nuts. And I ageee w you on briles. He's a no go

  14. #214
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,234
    vCash
    3100
    Jeff Traylor is a very good coach. If Texas A&M doesn't hire him, I think we should really consider him.

  15. #215
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    10,490
    vCash
    1003100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    No doubt- but Briles was cleared recently of wrongdoing. He's a helluva asset if we have to hire a coordinator
    Im good with Briles

  16. #216
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,719
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckyIsAB**** View Post
    Im good with Briles
    He's talking about art.

  17. #217
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,719
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by NCDawg View Post
    Jeff Traylor is a very good coach. If Texas A&M doesn't hire him, I think we should really consider him.
    I'm not sure he's wanting to take the lunge our way. Could be wrong but don't believe so

  18. #218
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,839
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    literally what the court said- I'm good with it. But damn man- if we get to Lebby on the list after missing on the 6-7 other targets- we have to just hold our nose and do it
    I lived in Waco around that time and can tell you Briles did some shady stuff, and not only swept it under the rug, he had local media and law turning an eye. Like a TSUN culture.
    Google the articles about the transfer that came from Boise. Briles claimed he had no idea of the troubles of the guy, and Petersen publicly called out Briles about that and said he called Briles and told him do not take the kid and told about the trouble he had caused and was dangerous.

    If you want to say a court simply got him off the hook, then so did OJ as well.
    But Briles, and his family was doing some shady crap at Baylor.

    Let me edit: Saying it was shady is actually too nice a term for what Briles was doing. If it was anyone here who had a daughter handled by Baylor and Briles the way the did, I would put money down one of you would have put him in the hospital for it.
    Last edited by Santiago; 11-18-2023 at 09:17 AM.

  19. #219
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,839
    vCash
    3100
    Here is the article of Petersen calling out Briles. Anyone here trying to defend this POS needs to get off this board.

    https://www.sportingnews.com/us/ncaa...jiz2hwro8126lu

    " Baylor coach Art Briles denied knowing anything about Ukwuachu’s violent past, but Petersen essentially called Briles a liar in a statement Friday released to ESPN.com.

    "After Sam Ukwuachu was dismissed from the Boise State football program and expressed an interest in transferring to Baylor, I initiated a call with coach Art Briles," Petersen's statement said. "In that conversation, I thoroughly apprised Coach Briles of the circumstances surrounding Sam's disciplinary record and dismissal."

    Petersen’s side of the story is far different from Briles' account. When asked if Boise State informed him of linebacker’s disciplinary record, Briles said all the coaching staff knew about the defensive end before recruiting him was that he was depressed and homesick. "
    Last edited by Santiago; 11-18-2023 at 09:18 AM.

  20. #220
    Senior Member Coursesuper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    5,323
    vCash
    3100
    All this pearl clutching is just so typical of the Mitippy Tate way. Wake the 17 up folks. This has become a zero sum game that is driven by ESPN/ABC Disney. They will dictate what when and where for the foreseeable future in college athletics. We have a product to put on the field that sells or not. If we don?t we?re out period. Get used to it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.