Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 122

Thread: How about an AR Cult update?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,912
    vCash
    17200

    How about an AR Cult update?

    Let's start with Washington State. The Coug's scored 7 points yesterday with 245 yards of offense against 3-6 Stanford.

    Western Kentucky? 102 yards passing and 280 yards of offense in their thrilling 21-13 win over 3-7 UTEP

    Locke and Wisky lost to Indiana 20-14 breaking Indiana's 6 game losing streak.

    USC scored 42 points but was shutout in the 4th and lost. Lincoln better learn that he needs to sign some guys to play defense.

    The GOAT Offense off to a slow November start
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  2. #2
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,777
    vCash
    3700
    How about an update on the offense you think is going in the right direction?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    1,058
    vCash
    3371
    You're worse than the people that love the AR. We literally have some of the worst fans and it's not close.

  4. #4
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    11,772
    vCash
    1540588
    The AR folks are kicking your ass right now. They live rent free in your head and your offense is 17'n croom level. Enjoy

    I'm embarrassed for you

  5. #5
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,027
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by DownwardDawg View Post
    The AR folks are kicking your ass right now. They live rent free in your head and your offense is 17'n croom level. Enjoy
    Weren't the ones the AR guys wanted hollinshead and spurrier? If so, looks like no one was right

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    7,466
    vCash
    3100
    I was at the game last night and every home game to date. This "offense" we have now looked terrible since game one and the in over it's head "HC" and mainly rookie staff has looked lost to boot.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,912
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    How about an update on the offense you think is going in the right direction?
    How many teams are winning with their back-up QB?
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    11,708
    vCash
    3100
    We weren't winning with our starter either.

  9. #9
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,027
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    How many teams are winning with their back-up QB?
    I don't want this to be used as an excuse to keep arnett, but it really is a good point. Wisconsin can't win with Locke against a horrible opponent, aTm can't win without weigman, and our offense has gone from bad to horrible with wright

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    7,466
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    How many teams are winning with their back-up QB?
    AZ looking good since their QB change. Bet they are kicking their butts for losing to us. Cook anything interesting for breakfast or planning a big brunch? Emeril wants to know.***

  11. #11
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,027
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldendawg View Post
    AZ looking good since their QB change. Bet they are kicking their butts for losing to us. Cook anything interesting for breakfast or planning a big brunch? Emeril wants to know.***
    That's a good example.

    It would be interesting to see back up qb records in sec games the last 5-10 seasons

  12. #12
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,777
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    How many teams are winning with their back-up QB?
    I thought this offense worked better with a mobile QB?

    You got what you wanted and are wrong.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    4,119
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    I don't want this to be used as an excuse to keep arnett, but it really is a good point. Wisconsin can't win with Locke against a horrible opponent, aTm can't win without weigman, and our offense has gone from bad to horrible with wright
    It's only a good point of the offense was decent with the starter. But with Will we had ONE good game- at SC, and that was only a good game because they couldn't figure out how to cover Tulu and Will had a rare game where he's willing to chuck it deep. Vs every other team? Tulu wasn't getting open and the offense sucked.

    So yeah, we're worse with Wright vs Will, BUT the awful OL play and dumbass personnel decision to play a TE has killed the offense all season

  14. #14
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,027
    vCash
    10439
    Quote Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us View Post
    It's only a good point of the offense was decent with the starter. But with Will we had ONE good game- at SC, and that was only a good game because they couldn't figure out how to cover Tulu and Will had a rare game where he's willing to chuck it deep. Vs every other team? Tulu wasn't getting open and the offense sucked.

    So yeah, we're worse with Wright vs Will, BUT the awful OL play and dumbass personnel decision to play a TE has killed the offense all season
    I'm fine with adding a te. It would be nice if we actually had a decent one... thanks NCAA

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    8,831
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us View Post
    It's only a good point of the offense was decent with the starter. But with Will we had ONE good game- at SC, and that was only a good game because they couldn't figure out how to cover Tulu and Will had a rare game where he's willing to chuck it deep. Vs every other team? Tulu wasn't getting open and the offense sucked.

    So yeah, we're worse with Wright vs Will, BUT the awful OL play and dumbass personnel decision to play a TE has killed the offense all season
    USCe is 108 in Scoring D and 129 in Passing D. We're playing teams without a pulse and losing because we have even less of a pulse.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    3,013
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Let's start with Washington State. The Coug's scored 7 points yesterday with 245 yards of offense against 3-6 Stanford.

    Western Kentucky? 102 yards passing and 280 yards of offense in their thrilling 21-13 win over 3-7 UTEP

    Locke and Wisky lost to Indiana 20-14 breaking Indiana's 6 game losing streak.

    USC scored 42 points but was shutout in the 4th and lost. Lincoln better learn that he needs to sign some guys to play defense.

    The GOAT Offense off to a slow November start
    Point taken. But is your 3 yards and a cloud of dust offense any better?

  17. #17
    Super Moderator CadaverDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    33,745
    vCash
    3002900
    1. The air raid sucks
    2. Arnett and Barbay's offense, the WTFAWED offense (what the F are we even doing) is even worse
    3. Most fans with a brain prefer neither, and are actually the ones being proven right.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    3,013
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I thought this offense worked better with a mobile QB?

    You got what you wanted and are wrong.
    Yep. The Mike Wright cult is even more clueless than the air raid cult.

    Barbay is so lost on how to move the ball on an SEC defense, it is shocking.

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    7,466
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by the_real_MSU_is_us View Post
    It's only a good point of the offense was decent with the starter. But with Will we had ONE good game- at SC, and that was only a good game because they couldn't figure out how to cover Tulu and Will had a rare game where he's willing to chuck it deep. Vs every other team? Tulu wasn't getting open and the offense sucked.

    So yeah, we're worse with Wright vs Will, BUT the awful OL play and dumbass personnel decision to play a TE has killed the offense all season
    But, but, we have two, 2, OL coaches and a 3rd or 4th string GA portal player who has yet to catch a pass in what 4 years, a converted Freshman OL, and a converted WR at TE. Talk about a lost staff putting the best players on the field!

  20. #20
    Senior Member THE Bruce Dickinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Starkville, MS
    Posts
    1,292
    vCash
    3100
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    Let's start with Washington State. The Coug's scored 7 points yesterday with 245 yards of offense against 3-6 Stanford.

    Western Kentucky? 102 yards passing and 280 yards of offense in their thrilling 21-13 win over 3-7 UTEP

    Locke and Wisky lost to Indiana 20-14 breaking Indiana's 6 game losing streak.

    USC scored 42 points but was shutout in the 4th and lost. Lincoln better learn that he needs to sign some guys to play defense.

    The GOAT Offense off to a slow November start
    Please just STFU.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.