-
09-28-2023, 03:49 PM
#181
Last year's offense was average.
This year's offense sucks.
But I think the scheme can work.
-
09-28-2023, 03:51 PM
#182

Originally Posted by
KB21
This is where we are this year at this time.
This is where we were last year at the same time.
So, like C34 said, the D is the problem (at least more so than the O). D dropped ~0.1 to ~0.22. = 0.12 O down ~0.21 to ~0.16 = 0.5
-
09-28-2023, 04:05 PM
#183

Originally Posted by
BlackSailsDawg
Does you no good if the OL can not block within the scheme. Our Rushing game is 82nd in the nation.
How many of the big plays last week were off PA?
-
09-28-2023, 04:10 PM
#184

Originally Posted by
msstate7
How many of the big plays last week were off PA?
PA doesn't exist. It's not part of the Airbone*
-
09-28-2023, 04:34 PM
#185

Originally Posted by
msstate7
How many of the big plays last week were off PA?

Originally Posted by
MrCoachKlein
PA doesn't exist. It's not part of the Airbone*
No arguing with either one of you but also not sure that would've mattered either way against USCe. We'll see how it goes the rest of the way.
This week ... I don't think we'll move ball whether we RTDFB, PA, or straight drop back.
-
09-28-2023, 04:46 PM
#186

Originally Posted by
dawgday166
No arguing with either one of you but also not sure that would've mattered either way against USCe. We'll see how it goes the rest of the way.
This week ... I don't think we'll move ball whether we RTDFB, PA, or straight drop back.
We better. We moved the ball last year. We had 20 first downs and 300 yards and had 4 drives go the length of the field inside their 30. We should at least be able to move the ball.
-
09-28-2023, 04:50 PM
#187

Originally Posted by
msstate7
How many of the big plays last week were off PA?
What people aren't saying is the box was loaded for the run. After they backed out in the second half, the offense did little. This week is the real test of the offense. Let's see if Barbay can dial up something against a defense.
-
09-28-2023, 06:37 PM
#188

Originally Posted by
dawgday166
However he did score 19 against a Kirby Smart Natty D ..
7 of those points was a punt return TD
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
09-28-2023, 07:04 PM
#189

Originally Posted by
Coach34
7 of those points was a punt return TD
LOL ... ok the O still scored 12 then. However, a Leach coached team score 19.
ETA: How many punt return TDs or pick 6s did we have all those years under Mullen? I dunno and ain't gonna research but hell ... seems like Everytime someone mentions a pretty good score from last 3 years, you're very quick to point out there were points by ST returns or the D. Sure seems like a lot of those 😜
And we also had a very great moral victory this past week scoring 30 pts with a bunch of Srs and Grads on our roster, against the worst D in the league.
Last edited by dawgday166; 09-28-2023 at 07:10 PM.
-
09-28-2023, 07:36 PM
#190

Originally Posted by
dawgday166
And we also had a very great moral victory this past week scoring 30 pts with a bunch of Srs and Grads on our roster, against the worst D in the league.
a team Georgia could only score 24 on
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
09-28-2023, 07:40 PM
#191

Originally Posted by
Coach34
a team Georgia could only score 24 on
21 in the 2nd half. I'm sure UGA was fully engaged in the game the whole time. With a new OC who sucks. And a new QB. And more off-season turnover of their O personnel.
-
09-28-2023, 08:11 PM
#192

Originally Posted by
dawgday166
21 in the 2nd half. I'm sure UGA was fully engaged in the game the whole time. With a new OC who sucks. And a new QB. And more off-season turnover of their O personnel.
Wow. That's hilarious.
SC is a minor rival of Georgia- they were there to play ball. SC is the only team Georgia has played with a pulse. Georgia- the top recruiter in the country- scored 3 points in the 1st half vs SC. Our offense clearly outplayed theirs against SC. End of story
Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is
-
09-28-2023, 08:16 PM
#193

Originally Posted by
Coach34
Wow. That's hilarious.
SC is a minor rival of Georgia- they were there to play ball. SC is the only team Georgia has played with a pulse. Georgia- the top recruiter in the country- scored 3 points in the 1st half vs SC. Our offense clearly outplayed theirs against SC. End of story
You're hilarious. Now that you're in tight with coaching staff they can do no wrong. They have plenty of time to get things right now.
-
09-28-2023, 09:32 PM
#194

Originally Posted by
KB21
Then Arnett seriously needs to admit his mistake in changing the offense so drastically and move on from Barbay. He needs to fire Brad's buddy Will and his buddy Mike as well and get someone in that can teach the OL.
Barbay is not the problem
-
09-28-2023, 09:36 PM
#195

Originally Posted by
RezDog7
Barbay is not the problem
Yes he is. That's not to say he will always remain the problem. He is over that offense and it's him that keeps trotting out 11 and 12 personnel knowing we can not properly block on the OL in those and that we lack TEs.
-
09-28-2023, 11:20 PM
#196

Originally Posted by
confucius say
We better. We moved the ball last year. We had 20 first downs and 300 yards and had 4 drives go the length of the field inside their 30. We should at least be able to move the ball.
Having 300 yards of offense in this age of College football is embarrassingly bad.
-
09-28-2023, 11:42 PM
#197

Originally Posted by
Jarius
Having 300 yards of offense in this age of College football is embarrassingly bad.
Would tend to agree. But that was against the #3 total D in SEC at their place. 200 yds against the #11 total D in SEC at our place is much worse.
-
09-29-2023, 08:30 AM
#198

Originally Posted by
Coach34
a team Georgia could only score 24 on
Furman put 21 on SC and lots of yards.
I don't see why all the focus on just one game, one matchup, and that we are giving validity to our staff off of relative performance.
We have 4 games to look at our offensive staff, and in the easiest stretch we will see all season. It was bad.
Hoping though that I am totally wrong for the next 8 games.
-
09-29-2023, 08:43 AM
#199

Originally Posted by
Santiago
Furman put 21 on SC and lots of yards.
I don't see why all the focus on just one game, one matchup, and that we are giving validity to our staff off of relative performance.
We have 4 games to look at our offensive staff, and in the easiest stretch we will see all season. It was bad.
Hoping though that I am totally wrong for the next 8 games.
The amount of people who are just ignoring the previous 3 games because we played good offense against the only other team worse than us defensively in the SEC is nauseating.
-
09-29-2023, 08:50 AM
#200

Originally Posted by
Santiago
Furman put 21 on SC and lots of yards.
I don't see why all the focus on just one game, one matchup, and that we are giving validity to our staff off of relative performance.
We have 4 games to look at our offensive staff, and in the easiest stretch we will see all season. It was bad.
Hoping though that I am totally wrong for the next 8 games.
Yeah, but you are not wrong. These 4 games have been bad. I don't care if we scored 30 when you see the OL bleeding DL against a horrible defense that's ranked 121 out of 130 teams.
The defense allowed the 126th ranked rushing team 144 yards on the ground!
We only had 32 yards rushing against a team allowing 117 per game (with our poor performance factored in)
Wright had 3 carries for -2 yards against a team that allows 117!
Until the OC proves otherwise, we are going to struggle from here out in SEC games. If you think they had the AR figured out, guess what. They know what they see on film with the OL. They are going to play the run, and get after the QB.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.