-
Originally Posted by
Quaoarsking
Can you show your work on that?
I'm not doubting you per se, but I've never been able to crack the NET formula in Excel like I did with the RPI, so it's always a surprise to see what the new rankings are.
I have not cracked it either, however compare our resume to Arkansas.
Arkansas:
17-8
NET 23
6-7 in Q1 and Q2
1 Q3 loss
SOS7
Nonconference SOS 10
MSU
17-8
NET 40
5-8 in Q1 and Q2
0 Q3 and Q4 losses
SOS 48
Nonconference SOS 205
The glaring differences of our resumes are that we beat them out right at their place and nonconference strength of schedule.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote