-
01-28-2023, 09:15 PM
#561
Originally Posted by
KB21
So, the typical meathead defensive minded idea of offense, believing that time of possession actually matters to winning.
You just can?t help being an idiot can you?
-
01-28-2023, 09:36 PM
#562
you do seem to evidently love the 25 seconds off the clock and 3 and out but I figure lotta you closet racist slave loving ole miss douche types swing and missed alot growing up and ended up perfecting the art of the circle jerk. I say again, I'd love to hear u call CZA a meathead to his face, you weak ass c*nt. you probably have a shark outfit
-
01-29-2023, 08:50 AM
#563
He's still wearing the bear outfit. His wife won't let him buy a shark until they're sure that's what the mascot is gonna be. He's still got his fingers crossed the next one will be more progressive and he can wear that dress and heels 👠 at the tailgate! (Not that there's anything wrong with that if that's his thing) edit: sorry KB. I should not have used he and his.
Last edited by dawggoneit; 01-29-2023 at 08:53 AM.
Reason: Typo
-
01-29-2023, 09:16 AM
#564
Originally Posted by
Pancho
It appears that CZA is seeking an offensive system which, if nothing else burns more clock and keeps his aggressive D on the sideline a touch more each game. I'd love to see some dialogue tween CZA and ole miss douche dinker KB21 face to face and watch the preppie piss himself.
We were 7th in the SEC in time of possession.
-
01-29-2023, 09:28 AM
#565
Not disputing that fact. He does want to limit the possibility of as many 3 and outs though.
-
01-29-2023, 11:20 AM
#566
Originally Posted by
Pancho
Not disputing that fact. He does want to limit the possibility of as many 3 and outs though.
So does every HC and OC in America at any level.
-
01-29-2023, 12:37 PM
#567
Far more likely to have three out out drives by trying to establish the run game.
-
01-29-2023, 12:40 PM
#568
yes but one burns more clock typically one the ground. evidently you were one of them cats in the red shoes in the ole miss library
-
01-29-2023, 12:48 PM
#569
Originally Posted by
Pancho
evidently you were one of them cats in the red shoes in the ole miss library
What the hell does that even mean?
yes but one burns more clock typically one the ground.
We ranked 54th this year in the nation.
we ranked 7th in the nation last year and 1st in the SEC.
Which year did we run it more in?
The point you are trying to make is not a valid point.
-
01-29-2023, 01:10 PM
#570
Originally Posted by
Pancho
yes but one burns more clock typically one the ground. evidently you were one of them cats in the red shoes in the ole miss library
The problem with running more clock is you get fewer chances to score. That's part of why tempo became a thing.
Now if we're up on someone late then yes we should run the ball.
-
01-29-2023, 02:01 PM
#571
Originally Posted by
KB21
So, the typical meathead defensive minded idea of offense, believing that time of possession actually matters to winning.
Hey dumbass, go check out Coach Leach’s time of possession stats while he was here.
-
01-29-2023, 02:05 PM
#572
https://cdispatch.com/sports/2021-09...early-useless/
?A stat that is nearly useless is time of possession,? Leach said Monday. ?We might lead the nation in that, which I take no gratification out of.?
-
01-29-2023, 02:12 PM
#573
The two biggest flaws in the thinking process some of you have about offensive football are these:
1. The idea that Mike Leach didn?t want to create explosive plays in the passing game. He did, and there were many opportunities that simply didn?t get executed well.
2. The idea that an increased focus on the run game is going to create more opportunities to create explosive plays in the passing game.
-
01-29-2023, 02:14 PM
#574
I don't know if TOP is useless...
There seems to be a correlation between TOP leaders and total defense leaders
-
01-29-2023, 02:24 PM
#575
It's not the time of possession, the issue this season was 3rd conversion percentage. That's what ZA would like to be better at. We were 112th nationally in conference only games. Less short drives from our offense, more 3rd down conversions, more scoring opportunities and less time the defense is on the field to increase its efficiency as well. That's is the synergy between both sides of the ball that needs to increase.
-
01-29-2023, 02:45 PM
#576
Originally Posted by
msstate7
I don't know if TOP is useless...
There seems to be a correlation between TOP leaders and total defense leaders
TOP value is dependent on your offensive philosophy. If you want to run the ball more then yes it's very important. So- yeah. Air Force.
If you want to score more points and score more quickly then it doesn't matter as much.
-
01-29-2023, 02:47 PM
#577
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
It's not the time of possession, the issue this season was 3rd conversion percentage. That's what ZA would like to be better at. We were 112th nationally in conference only games. Less short drives from our offense, more 3rd down conversions, more scoring opportunities and less time the defense is on the field to increase its efficiency as well. That's is the synergy between both sides of the ball that needs to increase.
Going to a more run heavy offense isn't going to help with that unless we're not converting a ton of third and 1's.
-
01-29-2023, 03:09 PM
#578
Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Going to a more run heavy offense isn't going to help with that unless we're not converting a ton of third and 1's.
Where the hell did I mention running it more? Good grief. It's not either or, quit trying to fit everything into black or white. It's about having overall balance on both sides of the ball. You can be very good on 3rd down conversions either way that is usually because you are ahead of the chains. Passing or running is irrelevant in the overall point of our piss poor 3rd down conversion rate. UM was 12th nationally and ran it a good bit, wouldn't you say. Quit trying to create a pass vs run argument when my post had absolutely nothing to do with that.
-
01-29-2023, 03:28 PM
#579
Originally Posted by
BlackSailsDawg
Where do you get that I think that? Greek was going to transfer. The other 2? No idea, but there is zero point in talking about it. Leach did pass away. We did move away from that system.
Sawyer beat out Lovertich. Again. None of that has anything to do with this.
Who is going full panic mode?
Actually Sawyer didn?t win the backup role a coach on the staff personally told me that
My point was we traded 2 backup QBs for a kid that started for a SEC school and who beat UK and Fla.. pretty good pick up,for a backup QB
-
01-29-2023, 03:31 PM
#580
Originally Posted by
Really Clark?
Where the hell did I mention running it more? Good grief. It's not either or, quit trying to fit everything into black or white. It's about having overall balance on both sides of the ball. You can be very good on 3rd down conversions either way that is usually because you are ahead of the chains. Passing or running is irrelevant in the overall point of our piss poor 3rd down conversion rate. UM was 12th nationally and ran it a good bit, wouldn't you say. Quit trying to create a pass vs run argument when my post had absolutely nothing to do with that.
Fair enough.
My overall point was we need to execute better on third downs in conference games.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.