-
12-12-2022, 10:53 PM
#121

Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
Kiff Kingsbury may be on the market.
You are dead on. I'm watching the game and thought the same thing.
-
12-12-2022, 10:54 PM
#122
Senior Member
At this point, it is time to talk to Arnett after the bowl game. If he fits the bill, roll with him... If not, SWING FOR THE FENCES. We cant keep pulling his G5 guys and "hoping" something works out. Enough is enough - the SEC is set to leave us behind if we dont hire the right guy and these risk takers will get us left behind as we try to rebuild around them again. I think if we dont go with Arnett, we have to hit a home run with a big splash hire that can bring recruits here.
-
12-12-2022, 10:56 PM
#123

Originally Posted by
Medic601
At this point, it is time to talk to Arnett after the bowl game. If he fits the bill, roll with him... If not, SWING FOR THE FENCES. We cant keep pulling his G5 guys and "hoping" something works out. Enough is enough - the SEC is set to leave us behind if we dont hire the right guy and these risk takers will get us left behind as we try to rebuild around them again. I think if we dont go with Arnett, we have to hit a home run with a big splash hire that can bring recruits here.
When?s the last time we hired G5 guys?
-
12-12-2022, 10:56 PM
#124

Originally Posted by
Catfish
You are dead on. I'm watching the game and thought the same thing.
Call him tonight and tell him we've got a ready made team. He's from the Leach tree and we would improve instantly.
-
12-12-2022, 11:00 PM
#125

Originally Posted by
smootness
LOL no he would not.
Colorado is a better job than any sec school not named vandy ?
-
12-12-2022, 11:02 PM
#126
Arnette had the Syracuse job for 1 week then he got the call and came here.
We are a much better opportunity than Colorado or Syracuse
Leach thought we were better than Washington state.
-
12-12-2022, 11:04 PM
#127

Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
Call him tonight and tell him we've got a ready made team. He's from the Leach tree and we would improve instantly.
Meh. He was never as good as Leach at Tech and failed upward to Arizona. He wouldn’t move the needle and would arguably set us back. He has been pretty mediocre at Zona too outside of 1 year.
-
12-12-2022, 11:13 PM
#128
Senior Member

Originally Posted by
CoachT14
When?s the last time we hired G5 guys?
Im just saying all these names people keep throwing out are "what ifs". Will Hall? The guy is 9-15 at USM... Why do we want to take a chance on something like that? I know a lot of people on here pride themselves in being able to pick out a diamond in the rough but why not go after a splash/headline hire like everyone else in the SEC seems to be doing rather than always going down to a lower tier coach and introduce him to "big football"... why dont we go big and go for a name like Sonny Dykes or someone? I guess I just dont get why people are always suggesting we always go to a lower tier coach and allow them to use us as a stepping stone...
-
12-12-2022, 11:17 PM
#129

Originally Posted by
msstate7
The offense was struggling this year with one of the best air raid coaches. If we go air raid coaches, we most likely downgrade
All we needed were some better receivers. That's it. We averaged 30 PPG with Leach this past year.
If we do something like say Dave Clawson offense we're going to need TE's and H-Backs. We have NONE on the roster except for that one walk-on guy who is coming in from Hinds next year who will be converted to a WR. It would be a major shift- not unlike going from Dan to Joe and Joe to Leach. That's what leads to downgrades because the players aren't there to run whatever completely opposite system.
Our guys know the Air Raid. A new coach coming in that is an Air Raid guy is going to have a lot less to teach and make over than someone who runs a different system.
-
12-12-2022, 11:20 PM
#130

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
All we needed were some better receivers. That's it. We averaged 30 PPG with Leach this past year.
If we do something like say Dave Clawson offense we're going to need TE's and H-Backs. We have NONE on the roster except for that one walk-on guy who is coming in from Hinds next year who will be converted to a WR. It would be a major shift- not unlike going from Dan to Joe and Joe to Leach. That's what leads to downgrades because the players aren't there to run whatever completely opposite system.
Our guys know the Air Raid. A new coach coming in that is an Air Raid guy is going to have a lot less to teach and make over than someone who runs a different system.
This whole situation just sucks.
I wonder if spurrier jr is interested in being OC.
-
12-12-2022, 11:20 PM
#131

Originally Posted by
Medic601
Im just saying all these names people keep throwing out are "what ifs". Will Hall? The guy is 9-15 at USM... Why do we want to take a chance on something like that? I know a lot of people on here pride themselves in being able to pick out a diamond in the rough but why not go after a splash/headline hire like everyone else in the SEC seems to be doing rather than always going down to a lower tier coach and introduce him to "big football"... why dont we go big and go for a name like Sonny Dykes or someone? I guess I just dont get why people are always suggesting we always go to a lower tier coach and allow them to use us as a stepping stone...
I’d love to have Dykes. I’d pay him 10 million. But I doubt he comes. The names I mentioned are realistic and guys who might would come and be successful.
-
12-12-2022, 11:20 PM
#132

Originally Posted by
viverlibre
1) It wouldn't take much for Gus, Dan or any other competent spread option coach to get their system up and running, just get a couple of QBs and RBs from the Portal and you're set. Although the OL has primarily pass blocked for the last few years, they can be trained to run block, most of them likely went through HS in a spread option offense.
2) Deon is absolutely not doing to leave Colorado after just taking the job and putting his players through the portal to sign with Col.
Gus Mahlzahn would be a MAJOR shift. It's not just QB. Again, we would need TE/H-Backs. We would have to bring in more backs and our o-line would have to change physically. Let me put it this way- Gus's QB at UCF is John Rhys Plumlee. No thanks.
-
12-12-2022, 11:22 PM
#133
Senior Member

Originally Posted by
CoachT14
I’d love to have Dykes. I’d pay him 10 million. But I doubt he comes. The names I mentioned are realistic and guys who might would come and be successful.
I am by no means a football expert that knows all the ins and outs of a coaching hire but I guess im just saying I wish we would swing for some big name hires rather than dipping down into a lower tier and hoping we pick a good one. Id like to see someone with a proven track record in "big" football rather than someone that has an ok to losing track record at a lower tier... but I see where you are coming from.
-
12-12-2022, 11:23 PM
#134

Originally Posted by
PikeDawg15
This whole situation just sucks.
I wonder if spurrier jr is interested in being OC.
The real question is does he want to be the HC?

Originally Posted by
CoachT14
I’d love to have Dykes. I’d pay him 10 million. But I doubt he comes. The names I mentioned are realistic and guys who might would come and be successful.
We can kick the tires. Even if he doesn't I think there is a chance we could get his OC Garrett Riley.
-
12-12-2022, 11:24 PM
#135

Originally Posted by
CoachT14
Meh. He was never as good as Leach at Tech and failed upward to Arizona. He wouldn’t move the needle and would arguably set us back. He has been pretty mediocre at Zona too outside of 1 year.
He would have better talent here than Tech.
-
12-12-2022, 11:28 PM
#136

Originally Posted by
CoachT14
I’d love to have Dykes. I’d pay him 10 million. But I doubt he comes. The names I mentioned are realistic and guys who might would come and be successful.
Dykes is realistic. The only challenge is the playoff expansion. He'll have a shoe in yearly in that conference.
-
12-12-2022, 11:28 PM
#137

Originally Posted by
Medic601
I am by no means a football expert that knows all the ins and outs of a coaching hire but I guess im just saying I wish we would swing for some big name hires rather than dipping down into a lower tier and hoping we pick a good one. Id like to see someone with a proven track record in "big" football rather than someone that has an ok to losing track record at a lower tier... but I see where you are coming from.
We're in a similar situation as we were when Dan left.
Veteran team coming back and potentially on the cusp of a special season.
Short term- it makes sense for us to keep as much in place as possible. But is that the best long term for MSU?
On one hand I don't want to mess up another potentially special season for all of us- so I don't want a Joe Moorhead. But MSU also doesn't need a Bill Stewart situation either where we have one good season- say 9-3- only to be followed up by 2-3 poor seasons and then a rebuild.
Honestly, we need a retread who will keep everyone in place and stay out of the way.
-
12-12-2022, 11:31 PM
#138

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
We're in a similar situation as we were when Dan left.
Veteran team coming back and potentially on the cusp of a special season.
Short term- it makes sense for us to keep as much in place as possible. But is that the best long term for MSU?
On one hand I don't want to mess up another potentially special season for all of us- so I don't want a Joe Moorhead. But MSU also doesn't need a Bill Stewart situation either where we have one good season- say 9-3- only to be followed up by 2-3 poor seasons and then a rebuild.
Honestly, we need a retread who will keep everyone in place and stay out of the way.
We've got a tough schedule next year. We'll need to tweak some things or get a few bounces for any semblance of this years success.
-
12-12-2022, 11:55 PM
#139

Originally Posted by
bulldawg28
We've got a tough schedule next year. We'll need to tweak some things or get a few bounces for any semblance of this years success.
Never easy in the SEC. Dropping Georgia off the schedule helps. Having the Egg Bowl at home is easier. We have one more home game than this year. We have Kentucky at home. LSU and Alabama struggled on the road this year- we have both in Starkville so that may give us a better chance.
-
12-13-2022, 12:19 AM
#140

Originally Posted by
Todd4State
Never easy in the SEC. Dropping Georgia off the schedule helps. Having the Egg Bowl at home is easier. We have one more home game than this year. We have Kentucky at home. LSU and Alabama struggled on the road this year- we have both in Starkville so that may give us a better chance.
Agreed
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.