Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 85

Thread: Look, Ray could have played Daniels this year and won 6-8 SEC games

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,111
    vCash
    3200
    Coach said it was all on Rick Ray next year, no Stansbury bashing, I believe him, why would he say that if he didn't mean it. Goodness, give the man some credit....I assume he means right after we lose er play our games at the SEC tourney. Right Coach?

    He might have to go for therapy, but what they heck?

    I have to admit, I am not much for message boards except to defend my friends so probably won't be hearing too much from me.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    9,086
    vCash
    3083
    We should have won the South Carolina game with the players we have. We gave up a lot of points in that game with plain old sloppy play. The RAT in the house was a big factor, of course, but if we score or at least have decent possessions following the 3's, then the effect is not so devastating.

  3. #23
    Senior Member BiscuitEater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,545
    vCash
    3700

    Agree, and please explain ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    We would have been a much better team with Daniels and Ware inside during SEC play- with Borchert coming off the bench.
    "Why" didn't Ray play him so that ...

    1) He could find out 'if' Daniels is able to be a 'Ray team' player 'cause we already know he was not willing to do what it took to pass ONE single math class when it was needed. Instead, Daniels is still an unknown.
    2) Ray, instead of regressing in year two, would have showed some improvement and at least had some momentum headed into recruiting and year three.
    3) Now, without 'significant' improvement, we have a 'lame duck' that won't get a year four.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Coach34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    33,712
    vCash
    17200
    Quote Originally Posted by BiscuitEater View Post
    "Why" didn't Ray play him so that ...
    3) Now, without 'significant' improvement, we have a 'lame duck' that won't get a year four.
    He's gonna get 4 years
    Walk like the King or walk like you don't care who the King is

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    303
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by BiscuitEater View Post
    "Why" didn't Ray play him so that ...

    1) He could find out 'if' Daniels is able to be a 'Ray team' player 'cause we already know he was not willing to do what it took to pass ONE single math class when it was needed. Instead, Daniels is still an unknown.
    2) Ray, instead of regressing in year two, would have showed some improvement and at least had some momentum headed into recruiting and year three.
    3) Now, without 'significant' improvement, we have a 'lame duck' that won't get a year four.
    Because playing him for half of this season would leave us with a guy who runs out of eligibility halfway through the 2015-2016 season - playing him this season would have been short-sighted enough fro me to want to go ahead and fire Ray on the theory that he can't see the forest for the trees. Anyone who suggests that Daniels should have played this year isn't thinking it through clearly.

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    264
    vCash
    3200
    The fact that he isn't feeling any pressure to win amazes me. He is making 1 million dollars a year.

  7. #27
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by RICKRAYMADE View Post
    The fact that he isn't feeling any pressure to win amazes me. He is making 1 million dollars a year.
    I don't even know what this means.

  8. #28
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,222
    vCash
    3000
    Quote Originally Posted by BiscuitEater View Post
    "Why" didn't Ray play him so that ...

    1) He could find out 'if' Daniels is able to be a 'Ray team' player 'cause we already know he was not willing to do what it took to pass ONE single math class when it was needed. Instead, Daniels is still an unknown.
    2) Ray, instead of regressing in year two, would have showed some improvement and at least had some momentum headed into recruiting and year three.
    3) Now, without 'significant' improvement, we have a 'lame duck' that won't get a year four.
    Using the argument that Daniels should have played this year against Ray is insane. There's no coach in the country who would have played him for half this year knowing he would only have him for the first half of 2015-2016.

    And claiming that Daniels was 'not willing to do what it took' in regard to passing a class is equally insane.

  9. #29
    Senior Member Saltydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,735
    vCash
    3706

    I agree, however, if we don't get a legitimate wing player than can knock down some

    3's we're not gonna win many that many more games next year, even with the bigger guys coming in. Dunlap is supposedly a shooter but he's only 6'1" and we need more than one shooter, preferrably someone at the 3 that can knock down some outside shots.
    Last edited by Saltydog; 03-10-2014 at 11:16 AM.

  10. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    454
    vCash
    2710
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    We would have been a much better team with Daniels and Ware inside during SEC play- with Borchert coming off the bench. Roq could have played the 3 some- and we could have actually had a big line-up out there in some games to match other teams. But Ray didnt do that- why?

    Because what is best for the long term health of the program- win 3-4 more games this season? Or have Daniels and Ware playing together for the next 2 full seasons? Program building is never easy. But he made the right decision and we'll start seeing the benefits next year

    2015 is on Ray and we'll see if he delivers

    BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHHA! GOOD ONE! We are building for the future! taking our lumps now instead of later, I gotcha!

  11. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    454
    vCash
    2710
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach34 View Post
    He's gonna get 4 years
    He's gonna get 4 because this is Mississippi State. It's the same reason we should never have fired his predecessor. Some of you said that others of us were "settling." Well, now I say to you that we currently are "settling." Why should we have to settle for being the worst team in the SEC for 4 straight years without making a move? Don't you have any self-respect? Any coach, and I mean ANY coach, should have been able to get out of the cellar in two years in this horrid division.

    Just because we are MSU doesn't mean that you guys have to settle for being the worst program of all time in SEC basketball. You can have a little dignity and pull the plug after two years and an awful outlook. The Browns fired Chud as a head coach after 1 year wasn't it? Why does MSU have to watch the program literally almost have to disband because of the epic terribleness before a move is made?

  12. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    454
    vCash
    2710
    No one even comes to the games anymore. It's like a ghost town. This is 10 times as bad as it ever was for Stands. At least under Stands, people cared. Now no one gives a flip. Most people don't even check the box scores anymore or have any idea what our record is or who we play next. It's just a dead program.

  13. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    454
    vCash
    2710
    Can anyone name 4 players on this team? Sword...Fred Thomas....isn't there someone named Ware? That's all for me. Don't know what any of them look like except flat top Fred. Why would I care about one of the worst teams in SEC history led by the worst coach in the SEC that gets ripped by 20 plus every single game.

  14. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Gold, Mississippi
    Posts
    26,385
    vCash
    1094082
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandman14 View Post
    He's gonna get 4 because this is Mississippi State. It's the same reason we should never have fired his predecessor. Some of you said that others of us were "settling." Well, now I say to you that we currently are "settling." Why should we have to settle for being the worst team in the SEC for 4 straight years without making a move? Don't you have any self-respect? Any coach, and I mean ANY coach, should have been able to get out of the cellar in two years in this horrid division.

    Just because we are MSU doesn't mean that you guys have to settle for being the worst program of all time in SEC basketball. You can have a little dignity and pull the plug after two years and an awful outlook. The Browns fired Chud as a head coach after 1 year wasn't it? Why does MSU have to watch the program literally almost have to disband because of the epic terribleness before a move is made?
    JohnRick RayCohen will get his four years cause he was the National Championship runner up in baseball last year. That's worth at least 4 years of the worst basketball you'll ever see.

  15. #35
    Official Elitedawg Weather Forecaster TheRef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    10,461
    vCash
    67085
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandman14 View Post
    Can anyone name 4 players on this team? Sword...Fred Thomas....isn't there someone named Ware? That's all for me. Don't know what any of them look like except flat top Fred. Why would I care about one of the worst teams in SEC history led by the worst coach in the SEC that gets ripped by 20 plus every single game.
    Roq, ware, thomas, bloodman, chicken, ready, cunningham, borchert..then again, I'm a basketball fan at heart.
    B.S. Geosciences, Professional Meteorology Concentration, Operational Emphasis
    c/o 2015
    Mississippi State University
    @ColdSouthern911
    Leicester City FC Owner

  16. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    454
    vCash
    2710
    hilarious... John "Rick Ray" Cohen...I love it.

    But shouldn't it be Rick "John Cohen" Ray?

  17. #37
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    454
    vCash
    2710
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRef View Post
    Roq, ware, thomas, bloodman, chicken, ready, cunningham, borchert..then again, I'm a basketball fan at heart.
    you and the other 54 folks need to keep that gym rocking. I honestly couldn't care less. MSU basketball is tantamount to MSU softball, and has been for the last 2 years, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. I'll check back in when we start winning 20 games a year again (but remember guys, 20 wins doesn't mean anything anymore...how much does 13 wins mean then??).

  18. #38
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandman14 View Post
    Can anyone name 4 players on this team? Sword...Fred Thomas....isn't there someone named Ware? That's all for me. Don't know what any of them look like except flat top Fred. Why would I care about one of the worst teams in SEC history led by the worst coach in the SEC that gets ripped by 20 plus every single game.
    Quoted proof you should be sitting out this discussion.

    Bloodman, Ready
    Sword, Davis
    Thomas
    Borchert, Roquez
    Ware

    Walk-ons: Moore, Cunningham, De'Runnya, adding Staley next year.

    Redshirts: Daniels, NDoye -- giving us a 2nd 5 and a 2nd 4 next year. Iincoming Houston gives us a 2nd 3, while Black gives us a 3rd 4, and Dunlap gives us a 3rd 2.

    Incoming: Houston, Black, Dunlap -- and likely one more coming to fill us to 13 players.
    Last edited by engie; 03-10-2014 at 12:12 PM.

  19. #39
    Senior Member engie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    8,518
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandman14 View Post
    you and the other 54 folks need to keep that gym rocking. I honestly couldn't care less. MSU basketball is tantamount to MSU softball, and has been for the last 2 years, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. I'll check back in when we start winning 20 games a year again (but remember guys, 20 wins doesn't mean anything anymore...how much does 13 wins mean then??).
    So, you are sitting it out from this point forward then? Good.

  20. #40
    Official Elitedawg Weather Forecaster TheRef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    10,461
    vCash
    67085
    Quote Originally Posted by Sandman14 View Post
    you and the other 54 folks need to keep that gym rocking. I honestly couldn't care less. MSU basketball is tantamount to MSU softball, and has been for the last 2 years, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. I'll check back in when we start winning 20 games a year again (but remember guys, 20 wins doesn't mean anything anymore...how much does 13 wins mean then??).
    I will gladly do so. I'm sorry you could care less about a MSU sport. But hey, to each their own, right? You asked for someone to name more than 4 players on the team, I named 8 so I doubled your challenge. Yeah, it's tough to watch right now. There is no doubt about that. Do I get frustrated? Yes, what fan wouldn't get frustrated. Ray in his press conference today said that he is guaranteeing a full roster next year and that the lack of depth inside was what killed us. I can't argue with that. Next year is NIT or bust for me. I haven't called for RR's head yet this season, but if we don't get NIT next year I will call for his head and will lead the charge on it, if necessary. So I hope and pray I don't have to call for his head next season because that means that the hire was a failure. And don't you start saying "He's already a failure," or "This was the worst hire in MSU history," because we don't know that yet. I've said my peace, I'm done.
    B.S. Geosciences, Professional Meteorology Concentration, Operational Emphasis
    c/o 2015
    Mississippi State University
    @ColdSouthern911
    Leicester City FC Owner

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.