-
Originally Posted by
BB30
There is a difference in being a Stans hater and a realist.
I loved Stans and thought he did well considering our basketball history. I think most people bring up stans in defense of what Howland has done so far. They aren't hating on Stans, simply pointing out to Howland haters that Stans wasn't really any better and took over a much better situation than Howland did.
Nobody in our fanbase should hate either of them as they have both performed at about the same clip so if you were satisfied with what Stans did there should be no reason to be unsatisfied with what Howland has done so far. You can't have it both ways. Either both suck or both were a tick above average for our history here. They are extremely similar.
14 years. Stans made 6 NCAA and 5 nit.
Ben is not close to that right now. He may can get there though if we give him time.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote