Quote Originally Posted by Johnson85 View Post
Man, the two of you posting on the same account really need to get separate accounts. It's not like they charge. The one that says he just wants the players to have a choice to play or not and not lose any benefits or perks and doesn't realize that was always going to be the case could be "Lord McBuckiethead1" and the one that does realize they aren't going to be losing their perks but for some reason accuses other people of not understanding that could be "Lord McBuckethead2".

Or maybe y'all could just come up with two completely new user names and cut out some of the confusion. But y'all posting on the same account two minutes apart from each other claiming opposite things is unnecessarily confusing.

But yes, McBuckethead2, you are correct that they won't have to sell shit on the corners if they opt out or if they aren't even given the choice to play. But that's irrelevant to the question of whether they should be denied even the opportunity to play because other people might feel bad if something bad happens in a pandemic. But McBuckethead1, despite not realizing that the players aren't being coerced into playing by threatening their scholarships if they opt to sit out, is correct that it shoudl just be their decision once they are informed of the risk and the procedures that will be put in place to try to minimize the risk to the extent possible.
Wish I could rep you!