-
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
It is irrational to believe that our university should give the players every opportunity to not play if they object to it. It is irrational to believe that the players should have 100% a clear choice whether to play or not. It is irrational to not minimize the risk anyone who is outside their bubble is under.
1. Players get a free choice to either play or don't, maintaining all perks or equal to what they would receive as a player.
2. The AD office to take every single precaution that can be taken to minimize the players ongoing risk day to day during the season.
That is pretty much all I would need to get behind it. None of that is irrational. Acknowledging and not minimizing the risk that humans have to this virus is the irrational part, by definition.
Originally Posted by
Lord McBuckethead
What is weird is that you don't understand, whether they play or not, they still have a scholarship to attend classes and do all the things they would normally do as a student. Just no football. Kylin was talking as if they cancelled football he would be sitting his ass in Columbus every day. Shit man, he still has class and still can stay at his apartment in Starkville and chill. It's not a choice between football and selling shit on street corners.
Man, the two of you posting on the same account really need to get separate accounts. It's not like they charge. The one that says he just wants the players to have a choice to play or not and not lose any benefits or perks and doesn't realize that was always going to be the case could be "Lord McBuckiethead1" and the one that does realize they aren't going to be losing their perks but for some reason accuses other people of not understanding that could be "Lord McBuckethead2".
Or maybe y'all could just come up with two completely new user names and cut out some of the confusion. But y'all posting on the same account two minutes apart from each other claiming opposite things is unnecessarily confusing.
But yes, McBuckethead2, you are correct that they won't have to sell shit on the corners if they opt out or if they aren't even given the choice to play. But that's irrelevant to the question of whether they should be denied even the opportunity to play because other people might feel bad if something bad happens in a pandemic. But McBuckethead1, despite not realizing that the players aren't being coerced into playing by threatening their scholarships if they opt to sit out, is correct that it shoudl just be their decision once they are informed of the risk and the procedures that will be put in place to try to minimize the risk to the extent possible.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.