Quote Originally Posted by hacker View Post
Nope, of course not. For weeks he's been trolling and vaguely saying we're foolish for being concerned and has never said why. I'm guessing he's some kind of genius.
He's actually right about the numbers although there is more extensive and accurate data available now. But the models are still not perfect. With mountains of data any model isn't perfect.

Right now I would guess that their worst case scenarios if we did nothing at all could be even worse than the models indicate. But on flip side ... they also could be much better than models indicate. But same could be said for best case scenarios too.

But they do have a more accurate envelope those could fall within and either way ... the numbers aren't good.