-
Originally Posted by
DawgPoundtheRock
This ranking which is based solely on recruiting, has om at 25 and Arkansas at 26. We are 23 USCe is ranked ahead of us and UT and Fla are ranked next to each other. This ranking was last updated 9/29/19.
My question is if I?m and Arky have top 25 teams based on their recruiting for the last 4 years, how did they finish the year with such terrible records? IMO this is an excellent example of why the value of recruiting rankings is questionable.
Recruiting rankings are very important at the top & are meaningful tiers after that.
However, talent only accounts for about 70% of this thing. Talented teams with poor coaching will still suck.
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote