Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 88

Thread: Anyone got a major problem with Billy Napier?

  1. #21
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    By the way, ULL is struggling with USA who was a 27.5 pt underdog.
    This is the issue that fans have.

    We look at something like this and say "I don't want him", but it's really irrelevant as to whether or not he'd be successful at MSU.

    In 1999, the year Nick Saban left Michigan State, he lost 52-28 to Purdue & 40-10 to Wisky in back to back weeks.

    In 2002, the year Urban Meyer left Bowling Green for Utah, he lost to Northern Illinois, South Florida, & Toledo in 3 of the last 4 weeks
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  2. #22
    TheDynastyIsDead TUSK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    In your head.
    Posts
    13,249
    vCash
    1000619



    I'd prefer y'all NOT hire him... dude can recruit a lil bit, too....
    "It is not courage to resist TUSK; It is courage to accept TUSK."

    No.


    Easy there buddy. Tusk is...well Tusk is Tusk. Tireddawg 12.20.17

  3. #23
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpooldawg View Post
    I've seen many each way. I'm not naming names because the ones I know well enough to say one way or another are high school coaches, many are friends. It's not that important. Attention to detail is.
    Attention to detail is certainly #1 but it's tough to figure that out in an interview. It's much easier to find out if someone is type A or not.
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  4. #24
    Senior Member TheLostDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,317
    vCash
    2725
    I like the idea but I'd ask who he would bring on his staff in the interview. I know you can't set it in stone but I feel like that's important as well.
    I know that it's a pipe dream back but I wish we could make Grantham our Venables.
    I also think we couldn't do worse than Moorhead. At this point I wish we'd have hired Grantham over Moorhead. We'd be on team with him at this point next year with him learning to be a HC.

    Getting back on point, I'm fine with it but as said above I'd look deep into his history because they obviously did a terrible job of this with Moorhead. State better look back on how they messed up with Moorhead, make sure they don't make the same mistakes, set a list of expectations and find a coach that could accomplish it within a set number years. They also need to have this in the contact to protect both State and the coach in order to get a good coach and so we won't be in the situation that we're in this year

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,567
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLostDawg View Post
    I like the idea but I'd ask who he would bring on his staff in the interview. I know you can't set it in stone but I feel like that's important as well.
    I know that it's a pipe dream back but I wish we could make Grantham our Venables.
    I also think we couldn't do worse than Moorhead. At this point I wish we'd have hired Grantham over Moorhead. We'd be on team with him at this point next year with him learning to be a HC.

    Getting back on point, I'm fine with it but as said above I'd look deep into his history because they obviously did a terrible job of this with Moorhead. State better look back on how they messed up with Moorhead, make sure they don't make the same mistakes, set a list of expectations and find a coach that could accomplish it within a set number years. They also need to have this in the contact to protect both State and the coach in order to get a good coach and so we won't be in the situation that we're in this year
    Yikes on Grantham. I don't see why he would even be in our top 10 of candidates.

    As for the assistants, you just have to give Napier a big pool of money to hire the best staff possible. And need to fill it up with guys like Tony Huges and not guys like Luke Getsy.

  6. #26
    Senior Member TheLostDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    2,317
    vCash
    2725
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Yikes on Grantham. I don't see why he would even be in our top 10 of candidates.

    As for the assistants, you just have to give Napier a big pool of money to hire the best staff possible. And need to fill it up with guys like Tony Huges and not guys like Luke Getsy.
    I was saying I don't think Grantham would be worse at this point. I wish we could get Napier and put Grantham in his staff. Yeah I think we need to ask in the interview who they would approach to be an assistant and not limit the coaches by being too cheap. We see what that got us this year.

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,567
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLostDawg View Post
    I was saying I don't think Grantham would be worse at this point. I wish we could get Napier and put Grantham in his staff. Yeah I think we need to ask in the interview who they would approach to be an assistant and not limit the coaches by being too cheap. We see what that got us this year.
    Morehead is making 3.2 million which is outrageous. No one was looking to hire him. We could play Napier 2.5 and give him a 4 million pool for assistants and hire a great staff. You need a great DC, strength coach, Oline and Dline coach. Fill up the rest of the staff with good coaches but great recruiters.

  8. #28
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    11,749
    vCash
    1540588
    Napier is my favorite

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,567
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooterpoot View Post
    By the way, ULL is struggling with USA who was a 27.5 pt underdog.
    UL won 37-27, not that it matters.

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,701
    vCash
    4062
    There might be better options than Napier but he would be a solid fit for our program. Young. Has HC experience. Good recruiter. Coached with outstanding coaches. Knows Louisiana recruiting. Offense is a spread run centric system.

    I?d be fired up if he was our guy.

  11. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,567
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by ckDOG View Post
    There might be better options than Napier but he would be a solid fit for our program. Young. Has HC experience. Good recruiter. Coached with outstanding coaches. Knows Louisiana recruiting. Offense is a spread run centric system.

    I?d be fired up if he was our guy.
    Agree. That's the big thing. He's a fit. Both culturally and financially. And he has SEC experience so he knows what it takes and what he's getting into. He's getable right now. He may not be in 1 year.

  12. #32
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    43,728
    vCash
    3700
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    UL won 37-27, not that it matters.
    Hopefully distracted by negotiations with our Cigar Boys.

  13. #33
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1,354
    vCash
    3700
    I like Sonny Dykes more than Napier. He also had Lousiana connections. He has been a power 5 coach and knows the drill. He is doing great at SMU and wasn't bad at Cal. He is a great recruiter.

  14. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,567
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by 1bigdawg View Post
    I like Sonny Dykes more than Napier. He also had Lousiana connections. He has been a power 5 coach and knows the drill. He is doing great at SMU and wasn't bad at Cal. He is a great recruiter.
    He was 19-30 at Cal. 55-54 overall. And is 50 years old. Not really a fit at MSU either imo.

    But this thread is meant to be about Napier.

  15. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,567
    vCash
    2510
    Another great Napier article from SI...

    https://www.si.com/college-football/...tte-nick-saban

  16. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    3,690
    vCash
    3200
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    Another great Napier article from SI...

    https://www.si.com/college-football/...tte-nick-saban
    Very good article!

  17. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,567
    vCash
    2510
    Quote Originally Posted by Mjoelner34 View Post
    Very good article!
    2 more stats.

    1. UL is 10th in the country in Total Offense out of 130 teams.

    2. UL 8th in the country in yards per play. Every true gambler knows how important this stat is.

  18. #38
    Senior Member Tbonewannabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    10,905
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsDawg View Post
    2 more stats.

    1. UL is 10th in the country in Total Offense out of 130 teams.

    2. UL 8th in the country in yards per play. Every true gambler knows how important this stat is.
    But is he an offensive genius?*******

  19. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    621
    vCash
    3100
    This year will be our only chance to get him. After the conclusion of the 2020 season, forget it.

  20. #40
    Senior Member Commercecomet24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,431
    vCash
    3100
    Napier is familiar with SEC and southern recruiting and the way it works, good offensive mind, young and energetic, he could be a good fit, as well as some others out there

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.