Back from the game ..... Looks like improvement

[confucius say]

007 is to the extreme in his belief and support of Moorhead, but is this board really banning people for that? That is pretty horrible if so.

Hasnt he been posting here for a long time? Hard to believe it was a long range troll job.

Joe has underachieved and I hate the lack of toughness, but there was improvement today and I also do not think he should be fired right now. That should not be a bannable opinion.

[Cloak]

It looks like we have a ton of improvement to build on.

- Freshmen doing well on both sides of the ball.

- Shrader needs moor help. and he needs some mechanics work.

- Hill... ain't going pro, and exploded more through the holes today. He left some angles.


- 3 vets let the team down again. Let's remove the defense. Let's focus on the offense. 2 Wrs had 2 turn overs that hurt the over all performance bad. A SR RB who I thought should get the start has now fumbled 2 times in 2 weeks

I've bit my tongue on all of your delusion, but man you are either the biggest troll on the board or a moron.

[War Machine Dawg]

I?ve started skipping any post he makes and any thread he starts cuz his opinions are stupid bad and even when proven wrong he doubles down and keeps arguing. I opened this thread when it was first started because I didn?t pay attention to who started it. He does make it hard to keep up with a thread with all the bs I have to skip over. I need to figure out how to mute or block this goof.

Click his name to go to his profile. Under his avatar you should see ?Add to ignore list.? Click that and his posts are hidden. He?s the only poster I?ve ever put on ignore, but it was the best thing I?ve done. Only time I see his BS now is if someone quotes him.

[CadaverDawg]

007 is to the extreme in his belief and support of Moorhead, but is this board really banning people for that? That is pretty horrible if so.

Hasnt he been posting here for a long time? Hard to believe it was a long range troll job.

Joe has underachieved and I hate the lack of toughness, but there was improvement today and I also do not think he should be fired right now. That should not be a bannable opinion.

No. I banned him because I get emails every time someone reports a Post and it's constant that he's getting reported. Also, I haven't seen a single post defending the guy but thousands asking for him to be banned due to his over the top praise and defense of Joe. I would never ban someone for a Differing opinion....but I will ban someone if they are becoming a nuisance to the board and hundreds of people advocate for him to be removed. I'm totally cool with it if another moderator wants to revoke the ban, that was simply a call I made because I felt it was time and what the people wanted.

I stand behind it. Hail State

[gravedigger]

Would you rather me do what you've been doing and let this douche continue ruining the board and driving away viewers? If so, do what you need to do, Billy.

I'm a bit confused. He annoys the hell out of me too and I'm not one of those who think the Moorhead needs to go. But if being annoying is the standard here, you guys might have a bit of work to do tonight.

I see where you are coming from though. Repeating the same message over and over and seemingly just to get others on the board upset.

Using this standard might cause most of the board to have to take a break.

[DeputyDawg94]

Click his name to go to his profile. Under his avatar you should see ?Add to ignore list.? Click that and his posts are hidden. He?s the only poster I?ve ever put on ignore, but it was the best thing I?ve done. Only time I see his BS now is if someone quotes him.

Preciate it.

[defiantdog]

Why don't you just ban his IP that way you don't have to worry about him making multiple email addresses?

[BrunswickDawg]

Damn! 007 and Dawg61 banned within a week of each other. It looks like ****ing Christmas come early on ED.

The added bonus - the Political Board just improved too.

[BB30]

I'm a bit confused. He annoys the hell out of me too and I'm not one of those who think the Moorhead needs to go. But if being annoying is the standard here, you guys might have a bit of work to do tonight.

I see where you are coming from though. Repeating the same message over and over and seemingly just to get others on the board upset.

Using this standard might cause most of the board to have to take a break.

Not much different than the 45 posts started about how bad joe sucks every day and just worded in a slightly different light. That?s just as annoying. BTW I?m all for joe getting canned. Just tired of seeing the same topic posted in different ways repeatedly while positive threads about basketball etc. get pushed off of the first page in the first 10 minutes because we apparently need another joe sucks thread for the 100th time. I think we all get it, he sucks.

We have 10 who should we hire threads every day with the same names every time. I think we have had 13 norvell threads already and 6-7 Napier threads. Maybe a sticky at the top to keep all the coaching questions in would be good so the board doesn?t seem as cluttered by it and maybe a stickied joe sucks thread. I don?t know but something has to give.

A break would probably be good for everyone right now.

[KOdawg1]

I'm a bit confused. He annoys the hell out of me too and I'm not one of those who think the Moorhead needs to go. But if being annoying is the standard here, you guys might have a bit of work to do tonight.

I see where you are coming from though. Repeating the same message over and over and seemingly just to get others on the board upset.

Using this standard might cause most of the board to have to take a break.

There's a difference between being annoying and being a troll. Coach007 was a troll, and I fully support banning him.

[somebodyshotmypaw]

You lose all credibility when you don't call a spade a spade

And if anybody would know, it would be you.

[CadaverDawg]

Why don't you just ban his IP that way you don't have to worry about him making multiple email addresses?

Because I haven't been given that authority. I'm unable to do it.

[RocketDawg]

007 is to the extreme in his belief and support of Moorhead, but is this board really banning people for that? That is pretty horrible if so.

Hasnt he been posting here for a long time? Hard to believe it was a long range troll job.

Joe has underachieved and I hate the lack of toughness, but there was improvement today and I also do not think he should be fired right now. That should not be a bannable opinion.

I agree. He has over 12000 posts, so if he's just a troll he sure has hidden it well. I don't recall him ever personally attacking anyone like 61 has.

[Jack Lambert]

No. I banned him because I get emails every time someone reports a Post and it's constant that he's getting reported. Also, I haven't seen a single post defending the guy but thousands asking for him to be banned due to his over the top praise and defense of Joe. I would never ban someone for a Differing opinion....but I will ban someone if they are becoming a nuisance to the board and hundreds of people advocate for him to be removed. I'm totally cool with it if another moderator wants to revoke the ban, that was simply a call I made because I felt it was time and what the people wanted.

I stand behind it. Hail State

So you never get emails on anyone else?

[CadaverDawg]

So you never get emails on anyone else?

Of course. But not nearly as many as about him.

[Jack Lambert]

Of course. But not nearly as many as about him.

There is one who needs a time out. But I am not going to email you about him. You know who he is. He makes this board crap.

[msu15]

I'm watching...

I love it when you guys fight.

[Jack Lambert]

I agree. He has over 12000 posts, so if he's just a troll he sure has hidden it well. I don't recall him ever personally attacking anyone like 61 has.

I got banned for two weeks for saying F*** the French a few years back.

[Turfdawg67]

Not much different than the 45 posts started about how bad joe sucks every day and just worded in a slightly different light. That?s just as annoying. BTW I?m all for joe getting canned. Just tired of seeing the same topic posted in different ways repeatedly while positive threads about basketball etc. get pushed off of the first page in the first 10 minutes because we apparently need another joe sucks thread for the 100th time. I think we all get it, he sucks.

We have 10 who should we hire threads every day with the same names every time. I think we have had 13 norvell threads already and 6-7 Napier threads. Maybe a sticky at the top to keep all the coaching questions in would be good so the board doesn?t seem as cluttered by it and maybe a stickied joe sucks thread. I don?t know but something has to give.

A break would probably be good for everyone right now.

Here here! Shotgun will start two, back to back and they'll basically be the same thread.

[bobtail bob]

Sorry, another moderator can reverse it if they want, but I banned this idiot. Can't take anymore

His posts had long since lost value. They have gotten sad and pathetic