Andy C

[HereComesTheSpiral]

Hell Mullen was hitting it back then and is probably still hitting it now.

I would say there's a possibility of some freaky shit going on.

[mparkerfd20]

Yeah there's a distinct possibility Meghan is hitting it too.

[TUSK]

Prolly not for a million dolla a year gig... but would smash.

[deadheaddawg]

You do realize she worked for the university and they were colleagues?

And yes, having affairs within the workplace is a reason for consequences and this situation is a prime example of why. It 17s things up. If you want to run around on your spouse, that's not good but maybe not your employer's business. If you want to run around on your spouse with a colleague, that is a problem for the employer. Pissed off spouses show up at work; it causes animosity between people at work that know it's going on; colleagues spend work hours focused on their paramour that is right there rather than focusing on their work; etc.

Ummmmm.

Do you realize she doesn't still work for MSU?

I know for an absolute fact that the affair impacted Andy's job performance and it is reasonable to assume that will keep him from getting a comparable job elsewhere for the time being. Common sense and completely reasonable. I haven't heard of any indication that her job performance suffered. It seems reasonable that if she still performed her job, she would be able to get a comparable job elsewhere.

This isn't difficult to understand. Andy had a position where he was in the public eye and represented the university in said public eye..... AND his job suffered. She was not, and as far as I know her job did not. If you cant understand the difference, I dont know what to tell you. Its a simple concept. I guess you have never been in charge of hiring and firing employees.

[HancockCountyDog]

Hell Mullen was hitting it back then and is probably still hitting it now.

I'd hit the delete button if I was you.

[Johnson85]

Ummmmm.

Do you realize she doesn't still work for MSU?

I know for an absolute fact that the affair impacted Andy's job performance and it is reasonable to assume that will keep him from getting a comparable job elsewhere for the time being. Common sense and completely reasonable. I haven't heard of any indication that her job performance suffered. It seems reasonable that if she still performed her job, she would be able to get a comparable job elsewhere.

This isn't difficult to understand. Andy had a position where he was in the public eye and represented the university in said public eye..... AND his job suffered. She was not, and as far as I know her job did not. If you cant understand the difference, I dont know what to tell you. Its a simple concept. I guess you have never been in charge of hiring and firing employees.

It is a simple concept, but it is still apparently difficult for you to understand. See if this helps you. If someone is skilled at her work but is a raging bitch to everybody she works with and makes them miserable, it doesn't matter that she takes care of her work. Part of her job, whether it's in her job description or not, is to not make the work environment dysfunctional. To keep somebody on that acts like that, they not only have to be good at what they do, they have to do something that is hard to replace. Similarly, if someone is married and running around with another married co-worker, it is highly likely to introduce dysfunction within the work environment even if that person takes care of his/her individual responsibilities. There is a reason non-fraternization policies used to be reasonably common and apply even to non-married people not in each other's chain of command. It gets messy even when you aren't introducing the infidelity aspect into it.

So yes, it would be normal for her to suffer consequences in her career b/c of it. Again, not much b/c of the nature of her career. She's just not in a position where it's a huge issue for her future employer (and on the flipside, also not of a position where they would be willing to put up with a lot b/c of her value). But for most employers, to the extent they are aware of the blow up at state (which I assume will be most universities, at least once they do a little due diligence), it would be a negative for her. It just doesn't matter for her because Mullen had leverage and Mullen wanted to take her to UF. Had he left her at MSU, things probably would have gotten frosty for her and when she left, there's a good chance she would not be competitive for positions she otherwise would have been competitive for.

[JoseBrown]

It is a simple concept

Yes it is, and there's a name for it. It's called "Shitting where you eat." And it got that name by causing everything else you posted there...

[Bothrops]

Man what a long way to fall. Head baseball coach of Mississippi State to coaching high school baseball. I hope ol gal was worth it.

Meanwhile, I think she's still employed at UF....?

[bulldogcountry1]

It’s irrelevant now, but I wonder if the “distraction” would have been 100% responsible for the program’s inevitable downfall. I was concerned about AC long before he was fired. He was always preoccupied with social media and seemed quite immature. In the fall before “the fall”, things were starting to leak out about how he seemed in over his head. I never saw him as a guy who could run an SEC program and manage a complex scholarship situation. Fortunately, we had great player leadership and Henderson to keep it all from falling apart.

I think he’s a good assistant coach, and that’s it. I can’t stand Maineri, but I’ll never forget how he acted when AC was hired away from him. He seemed genuinely confused.

[Dawgology]

"It" is undefeated for a reason, guys...

and "it" will retire undefeated....

Amen