-

Originally Posted by
MarketingBully
This will be proven this fall so we shall see. Clifford is a pro style QB with very limited running ability and they are running an RPO offense. Not the best situation.
Is he Tyler Russell running or Aaron Rodgers? How limited are we talking about? If you give him 5-10 yards every play or is it 10-15?
-

Originally Posted by
Tbonewannabe
Also you can think about the fact that if KT redshirts this year then he would be on the same track as Dak was on (starting as a redshirt sophomore only due to injury). Now I imagine Joe would put KT in at times if he plays this year either at QB or catching the ball but if he redshirts then he still has 2 possible years to start. Most QBs just start for 2 years in college. It is getting more common for QBs to come in as freshmen or sophomores but most of those guys are either high level guys or starting out of necessity.
With the new red shirt rule just save him until 4 games left.
-

Originally Posted by
Jack Lambert
With the new red shirt rule just save him until 4 games left.
Very true, I forgot about that.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
If there's one thing I know, it's you are much better qualified to know who is better between Clifford and Stevens than franklin. You may be right, but you have nothing to base this on. In limited playing time last year, Clifford had a 399.7 passer rating. Sure that's going to go waaaay down, but I think franklin knows more about both than you.
And you really have nothing to base yours on either. You make a BIG assumption that Franklin orchestrated this situation and had it work out just the way he wanted by letting Stevens transfer. Its just as likely that Franklin was trying to keep both guys reasonably happy so that neither would transfer. And I say that because every report just said that Franklin would not name Stevens as the starter, I've not heard or read once that he actually had named Clifford the starter before Stevens left. Franklin didn't know how well Stevens would come back from his injury after missing all bowl practices and Spring practice, and to end up with Clifford transferring would have lost out on a possible 2 year starter versus the 1 year he would get out of Stevens. I would be willing to bet Franklin was hoping to keep both guys if at all possible.
-

Originally Posted by
maroonmania
And you really have nothing to base yours on either. You make a BIG assumption that Franklin orchestrated this situation and had it work out just the way he wanted by letting Stevens transfer. Its just as likely that Franklin was trying to keep both guys reasonably happy so that neither would transfer. And I say that because every report just said that Franklin would not name Stevens as the starter, I've not heard or read once that he actually had named Clifford the starter before Stevens left. Franklin didn't know how well Stevens would come back from his injury after missing all bowl practices and Spring practice, and to end up with Clifford transferring would have lost out on a possible 2 year starter versus the 1 year he would get out of Stevens. I would be willing to bet Franklin was hoping to keep both guys if at all possible.
Where in the world did you come up with this fantasy? I'm not franklin, but I bet he wanted to have Clifford as his starter with tommy in the same role he's been in there for 3 years. I've never said franklin wanted Stevens to transfer... pure horse crap!
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Where in the world did you come up with this fantasy? I'm not franklin, but I bet he wanted to have Clifford as his starter with tommy in the same role he's been in there for 3 years. I've never said franklin wanted Stevens to transfer... pure horse crap!
Not wanted him to transfer but was more than willing to let him transfer because you are making the assumption that you believe Franklin thinks Clifford is better and wants him to start but was hoping to keep Stevens around. Seems several are making this assumption. All we really know is that Franklin wouldn't guarantee either the starting job after Spring.
-

Originally Posted by
maroonmania
Not wanted him to transfer but was more than willing to let him transfer because you are making the assumption that you believe Franklin thinks Clifford is better and wants him to start but was hoping to keep Stevens around. Seems several are making this assumption. All we really know is that Franklin wouldn't guarantee either the starting job after Spring.
Which is what Stevens said he required to stay. If franklin thought Stevens was the better qb, don't you think he'd do what it took to keep him
Last edited by msstate7; 07-03-2019 at 07:37 PM.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Which is what Stevens said he required to stay. If franklin thought Stevens was the better qb, don't you think he'd do what it took to keep him?
Franklin doesn't seem the type to be pressured or blackmailed into anything. Franklin obviously didn't think Stevens was enough better than Clifford, if at all, to give in to demands. The other complicating issue is all the time Stevens lost to injury while Clifford was out there with the team. Stevens wasn't the incumbent starter so Franklin probably didn't feel like he was owed any kind of guarantee coming off the injury.
-

Originally Posted by
maroonmania
Franklin doesn't seem the type to be pressured or blackmailed into anything. Franklin obviously didn't think Stevens was enough better than Clifford, if at all, to give in to demands. The other complicating issue is all the time Stevens lost to injury while Clifford was out there with the team. Stevens wasn't the incumbent starter so Franklin probably didn't feel like he was owed any kind of guarantee coming off the injury.
Fair enough
-
Again, Stevens can be worse than Clifford and still be the best QB on our roster right now. I have no idea how good Stevens, Clifford, or Thompson are at the current moment, but if Stevens is the best one wearing maroon then I couldn’t care less how the QB battle at Penn State would’ve played out.
-
No one is talking about the fact that Franklin mishandled Stevens injury last year. It has to be hard to give a coach the benefit of the doubt in that situation if you are Stevens and he tells you that you have to compete for the job after all of that.
-

Originally Posted by
Captain Falcon
Again, Stevens can be worse than Clifford and still be the best QB on our roster right now. I have no idea how good Stevens, Clifford, or Thompson are at the current moment, but if Stevens is the best one wearing maroon then I couldn’t care less how the QB battle at Penn State would’ve played out.
True, I've never seen Clifford play one down of football. He could be even better than McSorley for all I know.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
I'm not worried about going to croom level. I think joe is a much better coach. I'm concerned we downgraded from Mullen.
I know we downgraded!
-

Originally Posted by
99jc
I know we downgraded!
BS. MSU will never beat Bama with a run-based spread. You beat Bama by stretching the field with some semblance of a downfield threat. Moorhead brings that if he gets his guys in here. And that process is beginning.
-

Originally Posted by
MaroonFlounder
BS. MSU will never beat Bama with a run-based spread. You beat Bama by stretching the field with some semblance of a downfield threat. Moorhead brings that if he gets his guys in here. And that process is beginning.
We should definitely hire and fire according to how we do against Bama**
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
We should definitely hire and fire according to how we do against Bama**
The point remains. Will there ever be another SEC West team to challenge in the West unless they can beat Bama?
-
bama (Harlem Globetrotters) and rest of the SEC (Washington Generals) has ruined college football. Their fans take the regular season for granted, waiting for the playoffs. My wife's aunt (fan from AL) told me at church she is not going to follow them this year because she is so mad at them for losing to Clemson last season. What a joke!
-

Originally Posted by
MaroonFlounder
The point remains. Will there ever be another SEC West team to challenge in the West unless they can beat Bama?
Nope. We ain't on bama's level though, and I doubt that's changing even if we hired urban Meyer. Not saying we can't win the west, but the stars have to align and even then, we'll need some luck.
-

Originally Posted by
99jc
I know we downgraded!
No, you don't.
-

Originally Posted by
MaroonFlounder
The point remains. Will there ever be another SEC West team to challenge in the West unless they can beat Bama?
Sure, heck Auburn has won the West a couple of times even during the Saban run. But honestly, we probably stand very little chance while Saban is still around. Would take something really special like the 2014 year plus getting Bama at home in the same year.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.