Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: This baseball team v. 2016, which one is better?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,030
    vCash
    13200

    This baseball team v. 2016, which one is better?

    I honestly didn't think it would be possible to have a team that good again for a long time. Obviously a disappointing ending, but that team was really damn good.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,036
    vCash
    13700
    I'll get back to you at the end of the year. I like this team better though.

  3. #3
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,265
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by chef dixon View Post
    I honestly didn't think it would be possible to have a team that good again for a long time. Obviously a disappointing ending, but that team was really damn good.
    I think the 2016 ended up being better than this team currently is, but this team is better right now than that one was. And I think this team has a higher ceiling. That team had very good SP, but I like this year's duo better than any 2 from 2016. 2016 also had a very good, deep offense, but it took them a little while to get going. This offense is already hitting on all cylinders and is better top to bottom.

    2016 defense and bullpen were better, but it also took a little while for the bullpen to come together. I think this year's team has as much bullpen talent as that one did.

    I like this year's team better.

  4. #4
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    13700
    Good question. Let?s unpack it.

    C - Kruger vs Skelton = Kruger
    1B - Lowe vs Allen - Lowe
    2B - 2016 version of Stovall vs Halter = Equal
    SS - Gridley vs Westburg = Westburg
    3B - Collins vs Foscue = Equal with a lean towards Foscue
    LF - Humphreys vs Rowdey - Equal although they do it in different ways.
    CF - Mangum vs Mangum = 2019 version
    RF - Rooker vs Mac = Rooker but Mac is a better defender

    Fri - Hudson vs Small - Equal in effectiveness. Hudson better pro prospect
    Sat - Sexton vs Ginn - Not close. Biggest gap between both teams.
    Sun - committee vs committee = Equal

    Closer - Humphreys vs Gordon - Equal. Trust Gordon more but Hump was more talented.
    Set- Up - Houston vs White - Houston late in the season

    Overall, I think the 2016 team was more talented but JT Ginn on Saturday gives this team another ace that 2016 didn?t have. Add that into this team having greater experience, and I think the 2019 team is more likely to win a natty.

    This team is tougher and more confident. The 2016 group was coming off some bad years. This team is coming off Omaha
    Last edited by ShotgunDawg; 03-29-2019 at 02:36 PM.
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  5. #5
    Senior Member Rick Danko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    906
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Good question. Let?s unpack it.

    C - Kruger vs Skelton = Kruger
    1B - Lowe vs Allen - Lowe
    2B - 2016 version of Stovall vs Halter = Equal
    SS - Gridley vs Westburg = Westburg
    3B - Collins vs Foscue = Equal with a lean towards Foscue
    LF - Humphreys vs Rowdey - Equal although they do it in different ways.
    CF - Mangum vs Mangum = 2019 version
    RF - Rooker vs Mac = Rooker but Mac is a better defender

    Fri - Hudson vs Small - Equal in effectiveness. Hudson better pro prospect
    Sat - Sexton vs Ginn - Not close. Biggest gap between both teams.
    Sun - committee vs committee = Equal

    Closer - Humphreys vs Gordon - Equal. Trust Gordon more but Hump was more talented.
    Set- Up - Houston vs White - Houston late in the season

    Overall, I think the 2016 team was more talented but JT Ginn on Saturday gives this team another ace that 2016 didn?t have. Add that into this team having greater experience, and I think the 2019 team is more likely to win a natty.

    This team is tougher and more confident. The 2016 group was coming off some bad years. This team is coming off Omaha
    Could not disagree more about most things than about Collins VS Foscue. If he holds his current path, it?s Foscue and frankly it?s not even close...

  6. #6
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,565
    vCash
    20439
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Danko View Post
    Could not disagree more about most things than about Collins VS Foscue. If he holds his current path, it?s Foscue and frankly it?s not even close...
    Collins in 2016 = .921 ops
    Foscue = .956 ops

    Collins was after 30+ sec games, regional, and SR.

  7. #7
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Danko View Post
    Could not disagree more about most things than about Collins VS Foscue. If he holds his current path, it?s Foscue and frankly it?s not even close...
    I think your having a recency bias. Collins was good
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,633
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Danko View Post
    Could not disagree more about most things than about Collins VS Foscue. If he holds his current path, it?s Foscue and frankly it?s not even close...
    Without looking at stats, I remember Collins hitting for a high average but with not as much power as Foscue is showing. Collins was also out of position, so his defense wasn?t as good as Foscue?s. Collins was a damn good hitter though and I would love to have 9 of him.

    And unless I am misremembering on when Rooker graduated, he had a good year in 2016 but 2017, obviously is when he went crazy. Statistically, as it stands right now, 2016 Rooker and Mac might be about equal or slight edge to Mac.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Rick Danko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    906
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    I think your having a recency bias. Collins was good
    That?s probably fair. I just remember a lot of frustration with Collins. But my memory is probably skewed because I expected big big things from him. He was good, but not elite. Foscue has that chance

  10. #10
    Senior Member smootness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    15,265
    vCash
    13000
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Good question. Let?s unpack it.

    C - Kruger vs Skelton = Kruger
    1B - Lowe vs Allen - Lowe
    2B - 2016 version of Stovall vs Halter = Equal
    SS - Gridley vs Westburg = Westburg
    3B - Collins vs Foscue = Equal with a lean towards Foscue
    LF - Humphreys vs Rowdey - Equal although they do it in different ways.
    CF - Mangum vs Mangum = 2019 version
    RF - Rooker vs Mac = Rooker but Mac is a better defender

    Fri - Hudson vs Small - Equal in effectiveness. Hudson better pro prospect
    Sat - Sexton vs Ginn - Not close. Biggest gap between both teams.
    Sun - committee vs committee = Equal

    Closer - Humphreys vs Gordon - Equal. Trust Gordon more but Hump was more talented.
    Set- Up - Houston vs White - Houston late in the season

    Overall, I think the 2016 team was more talented but JT Ginn on Saturday gives this team another ace that 2016 didn?t have. Add that into this team having greater experience, and I think the 2019 team is more likely to win a natty.

    This team is tougher and more confident. The 2016 group was coming off some bad years. This team is coming off Omaha
    You're missing Pilkington as the Sunday starter in 2016, and he was really good.

    I would also say it's not completely clear cut at C. Kruger was fantastic, but Skelton has been just as good so far. And I would give a slight edge to MacNamee in RF over 2016 Rooker.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    5,720
    vCash
    13621
    Quote Originally Posted by ShotgunDawg View Post
    Good question. Let?s unpack it.

    C - Kruger vs Skelton = Kruger
    1B - Lowe vs Allen - Lowe
    2B - 2016 version of Stovall vs Halter = Equal
    SS - Gridley vs Westburg = Westburg
    3B - Collins vs Foscue = Equal with a lean towards Foscue
    LF - Humphreys vs Rowdey - Equal although they do it in different ways.
    CF - Mangum vs Mangum = 2019 version
    RF - Rooker vs Mac = Rooker but Mac is a better defender

    Fri - Hudson vs Small - Equal in effectiveness. Hudson better pro prospect
    Sat - Sexton vs Ginn - Not close. Biggest gap between both teams.
    Sun - committee vs committee = Equal

    Closer - Humphreys vs Gordon - Equal. Trust Gordon more but Hump was more talented.
    Set- Up - Houston vs White - Houston late in the season

    Overall, I think the 2016 team was more talented but JT Ginn on Saturday gives this team another ace that 2016 didn?t have. Add that into this team having greater experience, and I think the 2019 team is more likely to win a natty.

    This team is tougher and more confident. The 2016 group was coming off some bad years. This team is coming off Omaha
    In 2016; 2b was Holland, Cf was Robson (hurt a bit), Rf was Mangum, and Dh was Rooker

    A real comparison would be:

    C- Kruger was an All American and 1st Team All SEC and probable MLB
    1B- Lowe is a MLB 1b
    MIF - Westburg
    MIF - Gridley
    3b - Foscue no doubt
    OF - Freshman Mangum
    OF - Senior Mangum
    OF - MacNamee - Rooker had not found the energy crystals yet in 2016
    DH - Rooker without the crystals

    SEC Rotation - Small, Ginn, and Hudson
    Closer - Hump blew the save in Game-2 vs Arizona and dropped a fly ball in Game-1 vs Arizona. Gordon all the way

    2016 was slightly better, IMO

  12. #12
    Senior Member ShotgunDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    37,277
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Danko View Post
    That?s probably fair. I just remember a lot of frustration with Collins. But my memory is probably skewed because I expected big big things from him. He was good, but not elite. Foscue has that chance
    I understand that and that's why I said I lean towards Foscue. However, I didn't think the difference was large enough that it would make lean one way or another in regards to which team was better
    CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG

    Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More

  13. #13
    Senior Member Todd4State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,036
    vCash
    13700
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Danko View Post
    That?s probably fair. I just remember a lot of frustration with Collins. But my memory is probably skewed because I expected big big things from him. He was good, but not elite. Foscue has that chance
    Much of the frustration with Collins was about his defense rather than his bat.

  14. #14
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,565
    vCash
    20439
    2016 didn't get its sheet pushed in by LSU

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Flowood
    Posts
    3,605
    vCash
    13100
    The best thing about the 2016 team was when Stovall caught the last out and slammed it into the ground. LSU fans hated that. Until we can get that fire back like the 2016 team had then we won't ever be competitive against LSU

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    205
    vCash
    13100
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd4State View Post
    I'll get back to you at the end of the year. I like this team better though.
    I get the feeling our performance this weekend will help settle this debate. Even before this weekend I would have said 2016, but that it's close. It's a wider gap now.

    With that said, the 2016 team ranks as one of the biggest disappointments ever because I thought they had everything to give us our first title.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,165
    vCash
    116728
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    2016 didn't get its sheet pushed in by LSU
    But the 2016 team was at least the most underachieving team in the last 30 years, maybe of all time.

  18. #18
    Senior Member DownwardDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pocahontas, Mississippi
    Posts
    12,043
    vCash
    1550088
    Quote Originally Posted by ArrowDawg View Post
    I get the feeling our performance this weekend will help settle this debate. Even before this weekend I would have said 2016, but that it's close. It's a wider gap now.

    With that said, the 2016 team ranks as one of the biggest disappointments ever because I thought they had everything to give us our first title.
    Good to have you around Arrow.

  19. #19
    Senior Member msstate7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    75,565
    vCash
    20439
    Quote Originally Posted by Barkman Turner Overdrive View Post
    But the 2016 team was at least the most underachieving team in the last 30 years, maybe of all time.
    Won sec, regional, and lost game 3 of SR against a red hot team. Disappointing, sure, but I think you're going to the extreme

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,165
    vCash
    116728
    Quote Originally Posted by msstate7 View Post
    Won sec, regional, and lost game 3 of SR against a red hot team. Disappointing, sure, but I think you're going to the extreme
    Pretty sure we went 0 and 2 against Aridzona. Was rated #1 at one time that year and did not make it to Omaha. So, yea. Underachieved.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.