-
It’s okay because LSU is going to get hammered. LSU is buying Watford this year. They bought Reid, Williams, and Days last year.
-
This is not in the cylinder.
It was not a goal tend.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SBNationCBB/status/1095511163926970369[/tweet]
CAN'T PUT A SADDLE ON A MUSTANG
Quit Your Bi$&$&?!, He's Not Going to Run the Ball More
-
FullSizeRender.jpg
Kentucky player had a hand inside the rim on the shot so it?s even
-
Originally Posted by
maroonmania
SEC refs would not have allowed MSU a win over KY in that manner in a million years.
If you look closely uk had a defensive goaltending first. Now I agree it was tougher to see, but Washington reaches through the basket and touched the rim. So there's that.
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
This is not in the cylinder.
It was not a goal tend.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SBNationCBB/status/1095511163926970369[/tweet]
Sorry shotgun, but in college basketball the cylinder is upward to the roof. It doesn't have to be literally touching the rim. If there were replay and uk hadn't goal tended first, which I say they did, that basket doesn't count.
-
It would be simpler if they went to international rule that if it's not on the rim, it's good to touch. But that's not how it is at present.
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
If you look closely uk had a defensive goaltending first. Now I agree it was tougher to see, but Washington reaches through the basket and touched the rim. So there's that.
Yes, agree with that.
-
-
Originally Posted by
ShotgunDawg
This is not in the cylinder.
It was not a goal tend.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/SBNationCBB/status/1095511163926970369[/tweet]
Not sure what is going on with people tonight but the picture you have shows that clearly AT LEAST 1/3 of the ball is in the cylinder. The rule is if ANY part of the ball is in the cylinder its basket interference. If a defender grabbed the ball from that position LSU fans would have gone nuts. The rule is NOT that the ENTIRE ball must be in the cylinder. They just let a lot of it go these days because so much of basketball is played above the rim but that is CLEAR textbook offensive basket interference.
-
If I understand what was said, you can only review the time not the offensive goaltend but as a State fan they would of ruled it off
-
Originally Posted by
maroonmania
Not sure what is going on with people tonight but the picture you have shows that clearly AT LEAST 1/3 of the ball is in the cylinder. The rule is if ANY part of the ball is in the cylinder its basket interference. If a defender grabbed the ball from that position LSU fans would have gone nuts. The rule is NOT that the ENTIRE ball must be in the cylinder. They just let a lot of it go these days because so much of basketball is played above the rim but that is CLEAR textbook offensive basket interference.
Correct, which took place right after the defensive goal tending. LSU wins. Bad call twice by the officials. Bet result, the correct team won
-
Originally Posted by
Dawgcap
If I understand what was said, you can only review the time not the offensive goaltend but as a State fan they would of ruled it off
No they wouldn't. Not based on the clock no.
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
No they wouldn't. Not based on the clock no.
I don’t think a offensive goaltending is reviewable
-
Originally Posted by
Dawgcap
I don’t think a offensive goaltending is reviewable
Neither are reviewable. Offensive or defensive. So back to my original point
All the ref were looking at was did the shot get off. Period. Nothing else was reviewable
-
Originally Posted by
maroonmania
Not sure what is going on with people tonight but the picture you have shows that clearly AT LEAST 1/3 of the ball is in the cylinder. The rule is if ANY part of the ball is in the cylinder its basket interference. If a defender grabbed the ball from that position LSU fans would have gone nuts. The rule is NOT that the ENTIRE ball must be in the cylinder. They just let a lot of it go these days because so much of basketball is played above the rim but that is CLEAR textbook offensive basket interference.
That clears it up for me. I see that shot and say "the ball is OUTSIDE the rim" (half of the ball). ANY part of the ball...got it.
-
It was sarcasm but if we tip that in some other rule comes under effect but then again offensive goaltending is called initially! Can’t believe LSU even got that call at Rupp
-
Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Neither are reviewable. Offensive or defensive. So back to my original point
All the ref were looking at was did the shot get off. Period. Nothing else was reviewable
We actually agree more than you think!! Haha But if we tipped that against Kentucky or any other SEC school I bet offensive goaltending was called. No need for review then! That’s my pessimist view
-
Originally Posted by
MrKotter
It was not goal tending. Plainly obvious it wasn?t
Ha ha ha ha. Every commentator and talking head said it was offensive goal tending. Even the overhead camera angle provides indisputable video evidence.
-
As many times as we got screwed by bad calls playing them, I hope no one is feeling sorry for those 17ers whether it was a bad call or not.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.
Reply With Quote
