-
Penn State has 0 total points against Michigan
Halfway through the 4th quarter.
Just give it time people. Moorhead's system will work. But there's no way in hell that team scores 0 against Michigan if he's at the helm. Moorhead is a difference maker. Just gonna take time to get the right guys in here.
-
Or Michigan has a great defense maybe. And PSU lost their stud on offense, named Barkley.
-

Originally Posted by
MetEdDawg
Halfway through the 4th quarter.
Just give it time people. Moorhead's system will work. But there's no way in hell that team scores 0 against Michigan if he's at the helm. Moorhead is a difference maker. Just gonna take time to get the right guys in here.
How do you know? He never coached a game there without Barkley.
-

Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
Or Michigan has a great defense maybe. And PSU lost their stud on offense, named Barkley.
Got it. Totally on Barkley leaving and a good Michigan defense. Has nothing to do with Moorhead. Even though multiple people on here have talked about how Penn State hasn't missed him.
Maryland scores 21 on them in the Big House. Explain that.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
How do you know? He never coached a game there without Barkley.
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If you have to qualify his success then you have a weak argument.
-
Did Moorhead coach defense too?**
-
Michigan is for real! I love Harbaughs style of offense. 2 TEs, power running game, a lot of screen plays to the RBs and TEs and speed at WR. They're gonna make some noise this year.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
How do you know? He never coached a game there without Barkley.
Also lost leader in receptions (gesicki) and top receiver in yards (Hamilton). They lost 3 of top 6 receivers... Barkley was other.
-

Originally Posted by
Cooterpoot
Or Michigan has a great defense maybe. And PSU lost their stud on offense, named Barkley.
#1 in NCAA.
-

Originally Posted by
msstate7
Also lost leader in receptions (gesicki) and top receiver in yards (Hamilton). They lost 3 of top 6 receivers... Barkley was other.
Maybe that explains why McSorley is throwing so many "uncatchable" balls this year.
-
Yeah, I agree. The "Chessmaster" is good for at least 3 points a game.
"The QB and the receiver weren't on the same page there, but hey its only week eleven". (Jack Cristil)
-

Originally Posted by
MetEdDawg
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If you have to qualify his success then you have a weak argument.
Oh yeah I forgot he's the guru- couldn't score against 3 sec teams. My bad. One of which, Vandy and Missouri didn't have a problem against. But thanks mrs jomo. My original post was fact and would stand up on a court of law. Yours is plain conjecture.
ETA- if it's his "system" as you put it that's so good, why did they not score? They are using the same system. Just a different guy calling plays.
Last edited by Homedawg; 11-03-2018 at 07:35 PM.
-
You guys doing your best to stay negative after seeing the improvement the past few weeks and the potential this system has must be some miserable ****ing schmucks.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Oh yeah I forgot he's the guru- couldn't score against 3 sec teams. My bad. One of which, Vandy and Missouri didn't have a problem against. But thanks mrs jomo. My original post was fact and would stand up on a court of law. Yours is plain conjecture.
ETA- if it's his "system" as you put it that's so good, why did they not score? They are using the same system. Just a different guy calling plays.
What SEC team did he not score 3 against?
And you can use the same system all you want. But the person calling the plays dictates the offense. That's why Joe Mo owned up to the bad stuff.
But I'm sure you are pissed we are dominating La Tech and won last week. Some on here would rather be right than good
-

Originally Posted by
MetEdDawg
What SEC team did he not score 3 against?
And you can use the same system all you want. But the person calling the plays dictates the offense. That's why Joe Mo owned up to the bad stuff.
But I'm sure you are pissed we are dominating La Tech and won last week. Some on here would rather be right than good
Ok we scored. 7,6 and 3. ****ing congrats. And you said his system. His system is still at psu. It still worked in the bowl wo him? Why?........And he owned it? Great. After we laid 3 eggs. Fact is we should be no worse than 7-1. And no, wrong. I don't want to be right and lose. But he sucked for 3 games. Nobody, not even a in denial person like yourself.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Ok we scored. 7,6 and 3. ****ing congrats. And you said his system. His system is still at psu. It still worked in the bowl wo him? Why?........And he owned it? Great. After we laid 3 eggs. Fact is we should be no worse than 7-1. And no, wrong. I don't want to be right and lose. But he sucked for 3 games. Nobody, not even a in denial person like yourself.
Tell me when I said we didn't suck during those 3? Tell me one time. All I said was this system would work. Tell me why I'm wrong. We have continued to make adjustments and get better.
-

Originally Posted by
thf24
You guys doing your best to stay negative after seeing the improvement the past few weeks and the potential this system has must be some miserable ****ing schmucks.
Ole miss had more yards in a half than we've had against an sec opponent all year. And past few weeks. Hm. You mean one?? I admit it, I'm pissed we lost 2 games we had zero reason losing. I'm not just forgetting it.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Ole miss had more yards in a half than we've had against an sec opponent all year. And past few weeks. Hm. You mean one?? I admit it, I'm pissed we lost 2 games we had zero reason losing. I'm not just forgetting it.
Obsessing over OM's performance against other teams... mark that one off the miserable schmucks' checklist.
-

Originally Posted by
Homedawg
Ole miss had more yards in a half than we've had against an sec opponent all year. And past few weeks. Hm. You mean one?? I admit it, I'm pissed we lost 2 games we had zero reason losing. I'm not just forgetting it.
So you compare us to Ole Miss to justify yourself? Come on man. Do you not see how bad that is? Here's the thing. Joe Mo lost 2 we wished we had won. No argument. But we can't keep comparing everything to Mullen or saying damn we should have won. We don't know what we should have done. Florida is coached by Mullen. Kentucky is a 9 or 10 win team. LSU was in Baton Rouge. Tough set up for Moorhead to get the former HC, the best Kentucky team in 40 years, and LSU and Bama on the road in his first year.
We are looking at 8-4. I am ok with that.
-

Originally Posted by
thf24
Obsessing over OM's performance against other teams... mark that one off the miserable schmucks' checklist.
Glad you are happy losing at home to an avg fla team bc we were inept on offense. And ditto for uk and LSU offense. Glad you are ok w that. I'm not. It's ok, be content w the best roster we ever had.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Disclaimer: Elitedawgs is a privately owned and operated forum that is managed by alumni of Mississippi State University. This website is in no way affiliated with the Mississippi State University, The Southeastern Conference (SEC) or the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The views and opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the post author and may not reflect the views of other members of this forum or elitedawgs.com. The interactive nature of the elitedawgs.com forums makes it impossible for elitedawgs.com to assume responsibility for any of the content posted at this site. Ideas, thoughts, suggestion, comments, opinions, advice and observations made by participants at elitedawgs.com are not endorsed by elitedawgs.com
Elitedawgs: A Mississippi State Fan Forum, Mississippi State Football, Mississippi State Basketball, Mississippi State Baseball, Mississippi State Athletics. Mississippi State message board.