that OM was getting a 2 yr bowl ban and more sanctions:
They still refuse to accept. The Spirit and RebelGrove hate children apparently. Its their chance to take down "the Speds" that have owned them throughout the 4 years investigation and they sit on their hands...very telling if you ask me.
Yea, they don’t really believe the drivel they spout or they would’ve taken you up on that.
Rumor going around that NCAA insiders have told them to prepare thy anus. Don't know if true but I'll buy into anything going against those bastards.
Coach34 -- ED owns those idiots... Walk forward, we all know who participated in the take down of OM and their booster thugs (FYI-- It was not LL and KJ, they just answered questions from the NCAA and told the truth).Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
It is sad that the Spirit and RebelGrove cannot admit to their poor attempt/continuation of telling Lies.
The NCAA is about to hand over to the them on a silver platter....
The COI SANCTIONS...... Whether it is tomorrow or November 24, 2017.... just waiting for the melt down that is coming....
As to what is coming for OM..... 4 years bowl ban, 40 scholarships, Show causes (Luke, Farrar, Freeze, Kiffin, Saunders, Jones), Return of Sugar Bowl Money, Boosters that have been disassociated.... The Gift that keeps on giving....
They do love children. As long as they are future 4-5 star recruits they will give them money, cars, pay their bills, and get their parents jobs even.
Yancy says:Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapGame
http://morphinlegacy.com/wp-content/...LRr1qc9mxo.jpg
Keep getting after em, Coach!
No way! That would never happen!!***Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd4State
https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpre...trip=all&w=320
A) Yes we doQuote:
Originally Posted by Mimi's Babies
B) I think the 4 year/40 is wishful thinking. It's more likely 2 or 3 and 30-plus.
Luke isn't getting a Show CauseQuote:
Originally Posted by Mimi's Babies
I'm betting no more than 30 in a friendly wager for a lunch. But that's a shame because that's what USC got..... for only 4 violaionsQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Why would you think that Luke will not get a show cause? He is listed in the NOA between pages 30 - 43....Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiderman
I'll take that. I'm hearing more on what 99jc is hearing 32-36 schollys. Supposedly there is a fight between a 2 year or 3 year bowl ban tho. I know what side I'm pulling for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiderman
He wasnt recommended for one by the investigation group. Luke isnt getting one- thats why he was named Interim coachQuote:
Originally Posted by Mimi's Babies
2 or 3 years plus this year(their self imposed)?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
What about their Rasslin Champion?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
this year is year 1 bowl banQuote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
hearing there is a fight to add one more year vs adding 2 more years bowl ban. We'll know soon enough.
The "Leo did awful " mantra the OM sites are peddling is absolutely hilarious. All accounts are that his time before the committee was "easy like Sunday morning.". Our people are laughing at them because it was pretty clear Leo's time in the room went better than we even expected. And Leo was never asked one question about State. Thats not how the COI works. They werent there to ask about State.
I?m betting including this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Commercecomet24
Thanks, Coach. They need to add 2 more years to this one. And hopefully 34-40 schollys. They gotta to hit em hard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
C'mon guy's would you take a bet that you know you're going to lose? Plus this is a private board and we would all pony up if we lost. Those boys are corporate and they would have to un-a$$ that money on their on. I don't think Shannon who owns 247 would put out $2500.00 on a stupid bet. Plus I bet Shannon ain't real thrilled by his new guys (chuck and fancy) getting a libel lawsuit by Tunsils ex-stepdad dropped in their laps their first week on the job.
Because The NCAA enforcement staff didn't recommend a show cause for Luke at any time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimi's Babies
People like spirit Ben keep crowing that TSUN needs to avoid the 2-year ban because the players could transfer without penalty. While that is true its not that simple. Yes, with a two year ban transfers without penalty become automatic. However, the COI can accept the 1 year ban AND STILL allow transfers without penalty, its just not automatic. Its been done before.
They are going north of 30. The suit is turning their brand almost permanently toxic - and it hasn’t dawned on them that is happening. 1 year more, 2 years more - who really cares? Their stable will abandon ship regardless.
I think there is an argument for 40 based on the matrix but fact is, they are going down hard.
My guess: 2 year bowl ban and 32 over 4
Now, since it is painfully evident that Ole Miss fans hate children, please allow me to submit a "modest proposal ". We, the good men and women that compose the "SPEDS" make the bet for them and, should the penalty include a 2 year bowl ban,(it will) we cover the bet for them. Clearly, Ole Miss fans are pussies that lack both the courage and compassion to place this bet, so let's place it for there cowardy asses. I, Dolpus Raymond, will contribute $50.00 to help them cover a bet that they lack the balls to place.
No matter what the penalties handed down by the COI, it won't be enough.
Ole Miss ain't making a bowl this year regardless of the ban without Shae Shae. This year shouldn't count as a bowl ban.
Really think when the NCAA knew they had to sneak LL into the "meeting" they were set/obligated to correct the abuse to SA #39 suffered by their deliberate corrupt actions. 3 years and 40.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Of course the 3 year bowl band is immaterial..they aren't going to a bowl for ten years.
The 4 and 40 you speak of ain't gonna happen. Period. So just stop talking about it like you've got some magic 8 ball....because you don't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimi's Babies
Seriously, the NCAA adding just 1 more bowl ban (for a total of 2), plus the 25-30[+] scholarships most people expect them to get will absolutely cripple them. They ain't USC. The level of attrition that is coming, regardless of the increased bowl ban, will kill their program. Plus, it's not like they've recruited well the last 2 years to off-set this cluster-fu<k, so that will only compound things even worse.
They are ****ed. Period. Period. Period. Lets just start to agree with that. We don't need OM Spirit type smoke-blowin' to rile up the masses. If ever there was a group of State fans that should be immune to the bullshit, I'd hope it would be ED. That's why I enjoy this community above all others.
No idea why they would ever count previous scholorship reductions and bowl bans. They were still cheating.Quote:
Originally Posted by starkvegasdawg34
Yes, they are still cheating. Have not stopped.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
If you take the NCAA matrix for sanctions... The pain of the sanctions would have been less to have taken the death penalty. The gift that just keeps on giving.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeardoMSU
if they aren't bowl eligible this year will it still count towards the number of bans ?Quote:
Originally Posted by starkvegasdawg34
Yep, less than 10 years from one massive NCAA case, they did it again, and less than 20 years after another massive NCAA case, they did it again ( or should say finally got caught again, it started back a year or 2 after). It's so institutionally ingrained, no matter what happens, they will slowly get back to their same old ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgPoundtheRock
If the NCAA gives a rat's ass about the student athletes' interests, they need to explicitly give the '16 class the option to transfer without penalty, regardless of what the technicalities of the overall penalties result in. It will be setting a bad precedent if a program is allowed to objectively and deliberately lie to student athletes in order to aid its recruiting pitch and not be punished harshly for it specifically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy Jenkins
Tugg McGraw's kid is looking like an old douchebag.Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapGame
Bump, because I am sure the UM faithful just missed it. Surely they are not this soft to let this challenge just sit out here.
4 year death penaltyQuote:
Originally Posted by Coach34
Return to Club football
Work their way up to division 2
Another 2 year death Penalty, just for the hell of it.
??????Tug McGraw???????Tim McGraw who's married to Faith Hill is Tug McGraw's kid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord McBuckethead
Don't forget.... OM released confidential/classifieds NCAA documents concerning the COI Committee members, the date, time place, and who all should appear. Thus, OM forced the NCAA to spend extra money on secruity guards and bringing LL and his attorneys in the back door.
Just because.