Rosebowl got cornered on Facebook

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-23-2019, 12:33 PM
Todd4State

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tbonewannabe

Shrader is also from North Carolina who likes to hunt and fish. You would have to wonder if he would follow Moorhead to New Jersey. It would depend on if a new coach could sell him on the offense. He would also have to sit for a year at Rutgers.

The thing about Shrader is he fits pretty much any offense which is a good thing for us.
10-23-2019, 01:06 PM
dantheman4248

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach007

It is his job to do what he was hired to do. Period. His offense. And he went out and got a QB that could run it. And before injury, he ran it well.

Do I now need to quote the same group that stated the OL sucked in 2017 and recruiting of it sucked? 2 things are for certain. Moorhead got Johnson and he got Cross. Cross would NOT be here if Mullen had stayed. That's a fact. A kid from WP isn't here because of the Mullen crew.

Interesting that every position you have complained about, Moorhead seems to be addressing.

Every friggin team adjusts to audibles sir. EVERYBODY including Ms St.

Serious Answer. We are not talking about the same years. You are talking about 2018. You put you offense in and recruit for it. Mullen did it. Moorhead is doing it. And because we put the system in, the WRs were able to produce before Stevens was injured. Now a true freshman is starting and he is not as experienced as Stevens. He's not seeing everything yet... but he will.

Had he not put in his offense, then the WRs would not have had the improvement that they have had. So if not then? WHEN. He was hired for his offense.

- Fitz had 1767 yards in 2018 through 13 games. He had almost the EXACT same in 2017 under Mullen 1782

VS

- Moorhead's QBs already have 1,343 yards and we have 6 games left.

So yes, the passing game is better and it will continue to come together.

In Mullen's last season.... we had not one single WR with 30 catches. With 6 games left, we have one that is 6 catches from that.

That's called improvement by a coaching staff.

Lastly, if we don't throw...... we are not running.

It?s his job to win us football games. Doesn?t matter if it?s 3-2 or 100-0. He?s here to win. If his offensive scheme is what does that so be it. If it?s not, then adapt or die.

I didn?t say it?s his fault the OL is sucking. I said it?s his fault for playing to their weaknesses and continuing to let them flounder.

Of course they. And when you have enough tape on us it?s clear his offense has very few audible looks at this point. Defenses know what they are going to switch to if they give us a certain look and shift to the counter when we switch. If the simple ness is because Shrader doesn?t have the capability of running the full offense yet, then make things easier on him and cut out the full play audibles entirely. Teams have us figured out.

So by your own admission, Shrader ain?t there yet to run the full capacity of this offense. And I don?t get why you care about ?improvement in WRs? rather than wins. Again he may have been hired for his offense but his offense is supposed to win games, not struggle to get 10 points. The drop off in the running gams does nothing for confidence when we have receivers making more catches in garbage time because we?re getting blown out.

?If we don?t throw, we?re not running.? We?re already not running.
10-23-2019, 01:14 PM
TrapGame

Quote:

Originally Posted by dantheman4248

It?s his job to win us football games. Doesn?t matter if it?s 3-2 or 100-0. He?s here to win. If his offensive scheme is what does that so be it. If it?s not, then adapt or die.

I didn?t say it?s his fault the OL is sucking. I said it?s his fault for playing to their weaknesses and continuing to let them flounder.

Of course they. And when you have enough tape on us it?s clear his offense has very few audible looks at this point. Defenses know what they are going to switch to if they give us a certain look and shift to the counter when we switch. If the simple ness is because Shrader doesn?t have the capability of running the full offense yet, then make things easier on him and cut out the full play audibles entirely. Teams have us figured out.

So by your own admission, Shrader ain?t there yet to run the full capacity of this offense. And I don?t get why you care about ?improvement in WRs? rather than wins. Again he may have been hired for his offense but his offense is supposed to win games, not struggle to get 10 points. The drop off in the running gams does nothing for confidence when we have receivers making more catches in garbage time because we?re getting blown out.

?If we don?t throw, we?re not running.? We?re already not running.

We are not spreading the defense out. There are too many bunch formations. The defense then compresses around the offense. I cringe every time I see them line up in the bunch formation. Have we thrown a bubble screen? Have we thrown a screen to a RB yet? We may have but I sure can't remember.
10-23-2019, 01:29 PM
Coach007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duckdog

007 you are so full of crap!!!!!!

Prove any of that wrong
10-23-2019, 01:49 PM
Coursesuper

Y'all please stop,engaging this dipshit, he is doing all he can to troll this board and is very very happy to cherry pick stuff to continue this charade. He's a complete and total troll.
10-23-2019, 02:00 PM
Jack Lambert

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coursesuper

Y'all please stop,engaging this dipshit, he is doing all he can to troll this board and is very very happy to cherry pick stuff to continue this charade. He's a complete and total troll.

With all the negative threads one after another started by the same people, they are not trolls or is it that they are spitting out what you believe and 007 isn't? I think they and him should slow down a little.
10-23-2019, 02:04 PM
Coursesuper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Lambert

With all the negative threads one after another started by the same people, they are not trolls or is it that they are spitting out what you believe and 007 isn't? I think they and him should slow down a little.

Just a quick question there Jack, are you retired from our Corps and if so at what rank if I may ask?
10-23-2019, 02:14 PM
Homedawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Lambert

With all the negative threads one after another started by the same people, they are not trolls or is it that they are spitting out what you believe and 007 isn't? I think they and him should slow down a little.

I don't see many negative threads at all in the front page. But, considering we are 3-4 instead of 5-2, if there were they would be justified.
10-23-2019, 02:19 PM
Jack Lambert

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homedawg

I don't see many negative threads at all in the front page. But, considering we are 3-4 instead of 5-2, if there were they would be justified.

All I was pointing out was there is a lot of trolling going on from both sides. You get the same thing but title differently from the same people over and over. That's trolling. I am pretty neutral on the subject. I feel that we should wait until the end of the season and let it play out.
10-23-2019, 02:20 PM
Jack Lambert

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coursesuper

Just a quick question there Jack, are you retired from our Corps and if so at what rank if I may ask?

I was in for four years. Got pulled back in for 11 months for Desert Storm. I had a high critical MOS. They were really short going into war. I was an E5 Sargent when I got out.
10-23-2019, 02:30 PM
Coursesuper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack Lambert

I was in for four years. Got pulled back in for 11 months for Desert Storm. I had a high critical MOS. They were really short going into war. I was an E5 Sargent when I got out.

10-4 E-4, when I got out.
10-23-2019, 02:35 PM
Jack Lambert

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coursesuper

10-4 E-4, when I got out.

Ooh Rah!
10-23-2019, 03:25 PM
sandwolf

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coursesuper

Y'all please stop,engaging this dipshit, he is doing all he can to troll this board and is very very happy to cherry pick stuff to continue this charade. He's a complete and total troll.

This all day. I am amazed that people are still engaging this guy. He is either a troll or a window licking idiot....either way, it's a waste of time to argue with him.
10-23-2019, 09:35 PM
Coach007

Quote:

It?s his job to win us football games. Doesn?t matter if it?s 3-2 or 100-0. He?s here to win. If his offensive scheme is what does that so be it. If it?s not, then adapt or die.

Via his system. You don't like that fact... I don't care. It is what it is. Had he come in being hired for his system and tried to install a triple option, he should be fired. He didn't. And as shown by more than me, we have moved up in the passing dept. As in from 13th to 4th. etc... Huge thread about it.

Quote:

I didn?t say it?s his fault the OL is sucking. I said it?s his fault for playing to their weaknesses and continuing to let them flounder.

Again.. No. They sucked before him... and they have improved over the year. It's Moorhead's job to teach the needed skills for his system. Period.

Quote:

Defenses know what they are going to switch to if they give us a certain look and shift to the counter when we switch. If the simple ness is because Shrader doesn?t have the capability of running the full offense yet, then make things easier on him and cut out the full play audibles entirely. Teams have us figured out.

SO you want to take the "simpleness" ( and I say you have no idea what you are looking at), out and make it more simple. Are you listening to you..... So remove everything and make it easier for the defenses. Got it. Makes sense to me.
10-23-2019, 09:40 PM
cheewgumm

Every time I read stuff from Coach 007, I think

?this is the same guy who said we were going 11-1?

The I sigh and think ?he?s probably wrong again?
10-23-2019, 09:51 PM
Coach007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coursesuper

Y'all please stop,engaging this dipshit, he is doing all he can to troll this board and is very very happy to cherry pick stuff to continue this charade. He's a complete and total troll.

Prove anything I stated to be wrong. YOu can't. Please don't make me bump YOUR words:

Your thread Title: Our O line is really bad gents

Your words: Fvck you John Hevesy!!! Nothing else needs to be said.

Moving forward in time... More from you.. another great thread: All of Dan ******* bullshat is coming home to roost this season... ... and the content:

- lack of effort on the recruiting trail. That class would effect this current team btw.

HMMMM>....
10-23-2019, 09:57 PM
Coach007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homedawg

I don't see many negative threads at all in the front page. But, considering we are 3-4 instead of 5-2, if there were they would be justified.

No, it's not.

- Most were and are negative. and it's the same group.

- No, they are not justified... they are nothing more than illogical. For example, " the offense guru and passing". It's BS and you know it. YOu know damn well prior to injury the QB was throwing for 72%. Yet you act like that never happened and a true freshman should be working at that level.

It's simply BS.
10-23-2019, 09:59 PM
Homedawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach007

Via his system. You don't like that fact... I don't care. It is what it is. Had he come in being hired for his system and tried to install a triple option, he should be fired. He didn't. And as shown by more than me, we have moved up in the passing dept. As in from 13th to 4th. etc... Huge thread about it.

Again.. No. They sucked before him... and they have improved over the year. It's Moorhead's job to teach the needed skills for his system. Period.
ETA- the fact he can't adapt to the talent he has had could lead him to never seeing the talent he recruited.... but that's on him

SO you want to take the "simpleness" ( and I say you have no idea what you are looking at), out and make it more simple. Are you listening to you..... So remove everything and make it easier for the defenses. Got it. Makes sense to me.

I must e missed that we were 4th in passing.... our line has gone from good to manageable to shit in 3 years.
10-23-2019, 10:05 PM
trojandawg

His logical reasoning is broken. He?s an idiot an not worth arguing with. Like with a rock or a fence post.
10-23-2019, 10:05 PM
Really Clark?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homedawg

I must e missed that we were 4th in passing.... our line has gone from good to manageable to shit in 3 years.

He using just the Auburn and LSU games for that 4th in ranking.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page