Investigation

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-09-2013, 04:30 PM
MadDawg

In other words "How dare you question my internet cred! Bastard!"

Give me a ****ing break.

Folks need to get their panties out of their crack.
10-09-2013, 04:33 PM
CadaverDawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadDawg

In other words "How dare you question my internet cred! Bastard!"

Give me a ****ing break.

Folks need to get their panties out of their crack.

Exactly.
10-09-2013, 04:35 PM
starkvegasdawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach34

No- that is OM spin. The NCAA no longer does this.

And to think rationally- why would they interview CJ over 2 years later?

That part was actually directed to Chris jones but if it's bs spin then it's bs spin regardless of who it is.
10-09-2013, 04:38 PM
CadaverDawg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Political Hack

Not 40+ players. 40+ people.

That's great news. I hope every ****ing one of them has different violation to speak of.
10-09-2013, 05:01 PM
engie

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadDawg

In other words "How dare you question my internet cred! Bastard!"

Give me a ****ing break.

Folks need to get their panties out of their crack.

Poor ole MSU got to argue with each other -- taking up the OM mantle in the process.

Yeah -- this thread has been great for MSU. No doubt. I can see it now. "See, most of their own fans don't even believe what's happening!!1!1 Those guys are idiots!!11!1"
10-09-2013, 05:24 PM
engie

Quote:

Originally Posted by CadaverDawg

No, you Misunderstood. If you read my initial posts, you would know that. And if you didn't use quotes like "we know this" then people would understand that you meant to say "me and my sources" not "the EliteDawgs message board".

So, you don't want ME to speak for the board -- yet you do the VERY SAME THING in your second post here and have continually throughout the thread?
http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...-3t56-28kb.jpg

OK, EVERYONE HERE but Cadaver and MadDawg know this. My bad for calling it "we" and assuming everyone could get on the same page without blindly questioning something simply because "they don't know for a fact" about it -- when they don't pay or otherwise attempt to know about it beyond reading a few MSU message boards..

Quote:

And again, don't put words in my mouth to try and portray what I said. I never said I needed proof outside of message board talk...I asked DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY PROOF OUTSIDE OF THAT. You either A. Can't read, or B. Are trying to spin what I said so that you again don't have to admit the slightest bit of confusion or misunderstanding of what I said.

http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...-kg8p-60kb.jpg
So, you contend that you didn't "call us out" right here and say what we're saying is bullshit? Maybe that's not what you meant -- but it is DAMN SURE easy to interpret it that way.

Quote:

And for you to question my motives when all I've ever done was back EVERYTHING you said, is bullshit. And most would think, "maybe there's a misunderstanding here, because I am taking this as an attack but I doubt this guy means it that way"....before going off on a troll labeling tangent.

I did all that. You kept poking and prodding with posts like this. You were aching to call people out is basically what this thread was about. The whole ISSUE here is because you are suddenly "not ok" with us telling you what we are hearing from EVERY angle.
http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...1f7r-126kb.jpg

Quote:

Because I never meant it as questioning your beloved sources. I simply wanted to know where the info was coming from. Articles, websites, etc.? Or from your private sources? If you had said, my private sources, then that would have been the end of it and I would have believed it bc I trust your sources from past stuff. But when you are saying "we know this" and "we know that"...I am wanting to know how "we" know it. Because if just "you" know it, it's not "we"

So, ultimately, your ENTIRE problem in this thread is what is actually only an undefined pronoun?
Hack, Coach, former MSU player bulldawg28, Paul, Farley, Coach66/deep, and everyone else bringing forward info(or otherwise overt confidence in impending sactions that can't be discussed without incriminating someone or outing a source) = WE. There, it's defined now.

Quote:

And again, it's ironic that you always want facts and want to quote everybody, yet you are having to say, "basically this is what you said" and proceed to make shit up and put words in my mouth. Knowing that's not what I was saying.

Read your own quotes. That is what you were saying regardless of whether or not it was what you were meaning.

Quote:

But ole Engie can't possibly not get the last word in or have everybody think he was 100% correct and knows everything.

K. But you are fine leaving well enough alone, huh?
10-09-2013, 05:46 PM
Bully13

This thread went from awesome to dumster fire....can yall start over?
10-09-2013, 05:47 PM
hacker

popcorn.gif for this thread
10-09-2013, 06:37 PM
cheewgumm

I'm not sure who is right or wrong...and don't think it really matters... but can we have a class on how to organize your posts and how to do all this that you did here?

I think I could have won my scheduling debate had I been able to do this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by engie

So, you don't want ME to speak for the board -- yet you do the VERY SAME THING in your second post here and have continually throughout the thread?
http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...-3t56-28kb.jpg

OK, EVERYONE HERE but Cadaver and MadDawg know this. My bad for calling it "we" and assuming everyone could get on the same page without blindly questioning something simply because "they don't know for a fact" about it -- when they don't pay or otherwise attempt to know about it beyond reading a few MSU message boards..

http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...-kg8p-60kb.jpg
So, you contend that you didn't "call us out" right here and say what we're saying is bullshit? Maybe that's not what you meant -- but it is DAMN SURE easy to interpret it that way.

I did all that. You kept poking and prodding with posts like this. You were aching to call people out is basically what this thread was about. The whole ISSUE here is because you are suddenly "not ok" with us telling you what we are hearing from EVERY angle.
http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...1f7r-126kb.jpg

So, ultimately, your ENTIRE problem in this thread is what is actually only an undefined pronoun?
Hack, Coach, former MSU player bulldawg28, Paul, Farley, Coach66/deep, and everyone else bringing forward info(or otherwise overt confidence in impending sactions that can't be discussed without incriminating someone or outing a source) = WE. There, it's defined now.

Read your own quotes. That is what you were saying regardless of whether or not it was what you were meaning.

K. But you are fine leaving well enough alone, huh?
10-09-2013, 06:59 PM
engie

I add screenshots obviously with jetscreensot. It's quick and easy because it automatically uploads the shots to the internet in a forum-friendly format. Actually has the editing tools you see me use in pictures attached to it.

The rest of it is just quote tags. You move the original [/quote] to the end of the first statement you are debating. Then you highlight text and click the quote button to "wrap" all individual quotes thereafter. This is the quote tab.
http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...-hkky-44kb.jpg
10-09-2013, 07:40 PM
sbcmortgageman

In before the lock. ��
10-09-2013, 08:13 PM
Political Hack

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheewgumm

I'm not sure who is right or wrong...and don't think it really matters... but can we have a class on how to organize your posts and how to do all this that you did here?

I think I could have won my scheduling debate had I been able to do this:

nah. pretty sure... yeah, nope. schedule still sucks no matter how well organized the post is.
;-)
10-09-2013, 08:38 PM
Belegal

I started this tread with a simple question- did tsun receive a letter of investigation from the NCAA or not? After following 5 pages I still not sure but I believe they may have- hope so- does the NCAA ever announce it if they did send one if OM doesn't?
10-09-2013, 08:40 PM
Coach34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Belegal

I started this tread with a simple question- did tsun receive a letter of investigation from the NCAA or not? After following 5 pages I still not sure but I believe they may have- hope so- does the NCAA ever announce it if they did send one if OM doesn't?

No, the NCAA doesnt announce when they send one. The NCAA will announce when they are done. But to answer the question- yes, they got one.
10-09-2013, 09:00 PM
Political Hack

Quote:

Originally Posted by engie

I add screenshots obviously with jetscreensot. It's quick and easy because it automatically uploads the shots to the internet in a forum-friendly format. Actually has the editing tools you see me use in pictures attached to it.

The rest of it is just quote tags. You move the original

to the end of the first statement you are debating. Then you highlight text and click the quote button to "wrap" all individual quotes thereafter. This is the quote tab.
http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...-hkky-44kb.jpg[/QUOTE]

you're like a wizard.
10-09-2013, 09:09 PM
Belegal

Thank you coach!!! How long before it's public? Before signing day?
10-09-2013, 09:16 PM
Coach34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Belegal

How long before it's public? Before signing day?

That's the million dolla question

State fans praying so
OM fans praying not and doing everything in their power to keep it from breaking

Nobody knows at this point
10-09-2013, 09:20 PM
Rick Danko

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach34

No, the NCAA doesnt announce when they send one. The NCAA will announce when they are done. But to answer the question- yes, they got one.

BOOM!
10-09-2013, 09:41 PM
cheewgumm

Awesome stuff. Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by engie

I add screenshots obviously with jetscreensot. It's quick and easy because it automatically uploads the shots to the internet in a forum-friendly format. Actually has the editing tools you see me use in pictures attached to it.

The rest of it is just quote tags. You move the original

to the end of the first statement you are debating. Then you highlight text and click the quote button to "wrap" all individual quotes thereafter. This is the quote tab.
http://my.jetscreenshot.com/12222/m_...-hkky-44kb.jpg[/QUOTE]
10-09-2013, 09:47 PM
Noxdog

That's cad for you

But don't worry he will be kissing your ass for the next several months. Probably already has (Posted where I stopped reading).

Quote:

Originally Posted by engie

Don't get mad at me for reading what you stated the first time and taking it personally. Had you not meant it that way, you should have worded it differently. Because it was BASICALLY "produce sources or you all are just making assumptions and making shit up that the rest of us refuse to believe". Go and reread what you actually posted and tell me exactly how else I was supposed to interpret it.

It's always funny when someone goes there -- while at the very same time doing the exact same thing themselves.

And people that don't follow the stuff shouldn't question the people that do when they pass on information of what has been said. See how that works?

This whole argument is basically akin to this:
Word is passed on that Paul Jones says "Recruit X is leaning toward MSU and I expect him to commit soon."
Cadaver says "Someone provide proof. Not message board or blog posts. Otherwise, I can't accept this as a fact."
Everyone says that "all our insiders are saying it and others as well".
Cadaver says "well that doesn't qualify as proof". Then later, "how was I supposed to know that since I don't read their stuff?"

You know it because we just told you... Unless you choose to be defiant on the topic like you have been on this...

Let's just move on.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page